You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

fdrake

Comments

It seems a tight needle to thread. There's no guarantee that our representation of our environment's structure corresponds to the structure of phenome...
October 30, 2019 at 15:37
Eh, I'm still a noob in this, I'll take any free education I can get. The forward/backward propagation steps in Box 3 in the Frisk paper are probably ...
October 29, 2019 at 17:55
@"Swan" @"Mark Dennis" In Soviet Russia pissing contest stops you. Now.
October 29, 2019 at 16:59
Because this is also interesting, @"StreetlightX" had a thread on this at some point in the past. The gist of it was that relational concepts admit of...
October 29, 2019 at 16:35
I like this conjecture a lot. Explaining the unity of consciousness in terms of our body's self modelling processes as realising a single action-sensa...
October 29, 2019 at 12:53
Silicon lattices are made of silicon. They can still change. Silicon lattices are not silicon lattices since they are made of silicon. Silicon imperso...
October 29, 2019 at 03:39
What I take from that is that you never put the bong down.
October 29, 2019 at 03:18
... Put the bong down.
October 29, 2019 at 02:53
To where. :P
October 29, 2019 at 02:49
You make it sound like "order" is a single event, and "chaos" is a single event that happens when order doesn't. In reality, lots of stuff is self org...
October 29, 2019 at 02:44
Super interesting article. If I've read the article right, we have that actions and anticipations are both generated to minimise predictive surprise o...
October 28, 2019 at 20:31
I've been reading this one on and off for a while. Tell me what you think of it plx!
October 28, 2019 at 16:22
Before you learned to think critically and analyse stuff, you were still learning. It's not your fault that it's hard to challenge these things with r...
October 27, 2019 at 23:08
Why did you pretend to be a trans person in another thread you tried this crap in?
October 27, 2019 at 15:28
Go see a therapist? A sex therapist? It'll be hard work, but it'll be worth it.
October 27, 2019 at 14:42
I think that's a nice corrective, but I don't want to throw the baby out with the bath water. I did consider writing "embodied cognition", but I didn'...
October 27, 2019 at 10:53
Why did those bloody abos get an apology when I didn't..
October 26, 2019 at 16:07
I think what @"Isaac" is imagining as a concept is quite different from, in virtue of being a more general form of, ideas about what we do with ration...
October 26, 2019 at 15:41
That was from another other thread.
October 26, 2019 at 06:05
(previous thread) You're right. It's not just that. It's: Your position is internally inconsistent. But If it weren't, you (or the worldview you promo...
October 25, 2019 at 22:54
(1) Harryhindu posts in a thread regarding a prejudice or systemic injustice. (2) Harryhindu attacks all narratives which affirm the relevance of the ...
October 25, 2019 at 16:24
My (broadly Humean) guess is that concepts typically are learned associations; iterated relations of relations of neural patterns (patterns of pattern...
October 25, 2019 at 11:22
Probably the same demographic attends. We just remember the exemplary and contrast it to the usual.
October 25, 2019 at 10:13
That makes sense. Sudden noises, people going apeshit on shrooms, forgetting your keys, leaving the oven on while you're out... I wonder what the scop...
October 25, 2019 at 09:58
I figured you were all about the extended mind stuff, I wasn't just writing for you there, I wanted to highlight that it's easy to use a vocabulary th...
October 25, 2019 at 09:30
Agree that red is a concept. Stuff is also red. There's an interplay between language use and perception; the language we are used to invites us to pa...
October 25, 2019 at 08:39
When visiting your girlfriend's family for the first time, imagine yourself fucking their mother, and then their grandmother, this will allow you to e...
October 25, 2019 at 06:01
October 25, 2019 at 05:56
I think this is about right. I would emphasise, though I don't know if this is relevant to colour specifically, that when we perceive; language and co...
October 24, 2019 at 19:27
So let's imagine that there's an experiential state someone is in. This is how what they're doing feels. (edit: pay no attention to the situation and ...
October 24, 2019 at 13:44
Subjects are points in spacetime?
October 23, 2019 at 18:59
This seems agreeable to me. I'm still curious over exactly what kind of stuff counts as a 'facet of experience'; where are the boundaries? How did the...
October 23, 2019 at 16:31
I know you are not talking about concepts, you are being influenced by ones which you have that you are not articulating. This is concept talk.
October 23, 2019 at 16:13
That you think you're providing a theory neutral description of phenomenal character is part of the problem.
October 23, 2019 at 16:03
Very much this. Though I take a pretty cynical view of it. The kind of description of experience going on here is reflection upon it with a certain pr...
October 23, 2019 at 15:57
So the colour quales and shape quales are distinguished in our experience by something which is not reflected in our experience.
October 23, 2019 at 15:12
(1) I see the table, it presents as a certain shape and a certain colour. (2) The shape and the colour present together. There is a shape-colour quale...
October 22, 2019 at 20:35
I agree. Shape and colour are distinct concepts. Are they distinct in the phenomenal character? Are they distinct in the percept?
October 22, 2019 at 20:14
Ok! I don't think we're talking cross purposes, then. At least, I think I understand you. I assume there will be an analogous colour quale. Is the sha...
October 22, 2019 at 19:44
Right! And in the quale is there some corresponding shape property of the table?
October 22, 2019 at 19:41
Maybe! I see the cup as blue. The (my) phenomenal character (in terms of colour) of the cup has a blue quale. "What it is like to see the cup? Partly,...
October 22, 2019 at 19:38
What assumptions are you explicitly denying? What's a quale to you? Edit: run me through an encounter you have with a quale?
October 22, 2019 at 19:22
It's funny. Qualia discussions on here usually go like this in my experience. Everyone gets baffled because "the other side just doesn't understand". ...
October 22, 2019 at 19:10
I agree with this. How could I not? What I don't agree with is that it says the same thing as this: "There's some shape to the table, as a property of...
October 22, 2019 at 19:06
More words then please.
October 22, 2019 at 18:33
And I did. No. The shape of the table isn't experienced as a totality. If you like; there are table properties that are not experiential properties. S...
October 22, 2019 at 18:29
@"Isaac" also linked this one.
October 22, 2019 at 18:19
Sigh, you don't discuss with someone who refuses to answer return questions and defines your options. I don't want a rhetorical pissing match, I want ...
October 22, 2019 at 18:13
Ok. The table has lots of properties. How do these consist in the perception?
October 22, 2019 at 18:04
No? There's an underside of the table.
October 22, 2019 at 18:00