You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

fdrake

Comments

This is a whole field/. Not just confined to humans.
December 03, 2019 at 05:16
It was to deal with some stuff that came up. I think there will be separate forum wide threads for each discussion with the guest.
November 29, 2019 at 19:31
Deleted the personal remarks from your question. Also PM'd them to you in case you wanted to keep them anyway.
November 29, 2019 at 09:07
Done.
November 29, 2019 at 05:49
Title's too long. Not just editorially. It hits the character limit for a thread title.
November 29, 2019 at 05:12
I'm a bit hesitant about that being OK by itself, I think it would be OK so long as the quoted bit is contextualised explicitly by you in your discuss...
November 29, 2019 at 01:59
There's really only one order like this. You have a set like the naturals: {0,1,2,3,...} which are presented in their standard order with the successo...
November 26, 2019 at 22:54
I've made a joke before about Dirac delta priors, don't get to wheel it out very often. Alice: "What do you learn from the evidence?" Bob: "I always l...
November 26, 2019 at 16:23
That's amazing. The equivalence is ironically still true because both are false; the duck is seen without a black-band and so is the rabbit.
November 26, 2019 at 14:35
/uploads/resized/files/vk/ki8vmolysl2ggako.jpg The rabbit wears a black band on its neck if and only if the duck wears a black band on its neck.
November 26, 2019 at 14:20
It reveals that some environmental patterns can generate more than one perceptual feature. Notice that we don't disagree where the lines are drawn eve...
November 26, 2019 at 14:11
I guess we don't want to be anti-realist and say that any system just is our representation of it. Otherwise there'd be no possibility of disaccord wi...
November 26, 2019 at 13:49
Why would it need to be impossible? What's the reasoning behind (N1)? I don't think the hidden states matter here. The perceptual features or internal...
November 26, 2019 at 12:08
The thing that bugs me about the argument is (N1). If I can replace "real for certain" with "true", the thing that bugs me about it is I have to assum...
November 26, 2019 at 11:03
A bijection between evens and odds. The set of all even numbers is given by {2k} for k in {0,1,2,...,} The set of all odd numbers is given by {2k+1} f...
November 26, 2019 at 10:45
I gave you a worked example.
November 26, 2019 at 10:10
I quite like reading Marx as something of a metaphysician; what would metaphysics have to look like for what he's saying to be true? I enjoy reading h...
November 26, 2019 at 09:21
Answering out of order: Let's see if I can re-cast your argument as a syllogism. (N1) In order for an output of a model to be real for certain, the co...
November 26, 2019 at 09:08
To be honest I think what you're saying is irrelevant to the argument. Use value - (a use value is...) item that satisfies human wants or needs. Item ...
November 26, 2019 at 08:09
Unfortunately almost no one is cordial in argument all the time. It pays to be understanding when someone gets uppity. Though it's hard to remain unde...
November 25, 2019 at 23:50
For me it can be difficult to tell whether something's technical or not if I'm unfamiliar with it. Knowing what's relevant to what in a technical matt...
November 25, 2019 at 23:36
It's just in case. I think you need to check your math privilege. :yum: "Can you even imagine? They don't even understand Ito integrals..." (paraphras...
November 25, 2019 at 23:18
Define f: \rightarrow by f(x) = 2x Claim: f is a bijection. Proof: We will proceed by showing that f is injective and surjective. Injective subproof: ...
November 25, 2019 at 22:53
Satisfies no human want or need?
November 25, 2019 at 20:20
So what you want from Marx is an analysis of what it means for something to be useful. Rather than more cursory remarks regarding how something has to...
November 25, 2019 at 18:52
Not sold on this. If outputs of whatever system of belief formation we have actually were probability statements, rather than being realisations of pr...
November 25, 2019 at 18:37
An odd claim, considering seeing money as a social form of exchange is central to the value theory. So there are two sources of profit. One is profit ...
November 25, 2019 at 16:32
People will only buy things they can use. Something needs to have a use value in order for it to have an exchange value. When both apply, an item is a...
November 25, 2019 at 15:06
It would help if you described the contradiction.
November 25, 2019 at 14:00
The notion of a cat might be contained within a mind, though I'm not so happy with the vocabulary. Let's make it a bit less abstract. (1) I have a cat...
November 25, 2019 at 13:53
I'm skeptical that beliefs can play any sensible part in a definition of truth simpliciter. Though I can read what you have written as a definition of...
November 23, 2019 at 21:34
In: Bannings  — view comment
Eh, fair, I'll delete the comment. :up:
November 22, 2019 at 20:16
Insofar as the whole of existence is a heap due to the paradox of the heap? Dunno this argument.
November 22, 2019 at 15:02
I imagine it would be part of use value.
November 22, 2019 at 14:53
Two accounts: (A) So - phenomenal consciousness is defined as independent of access consciousness. These are conceptual distinctions. But: Observation...
November 22, 2019 at 11:14
Just wanna give credit where credit is due, you've made excellent posts this thread.
November 21, 2019 at 15:01
As are laws, countries, economies, cultures, people, love, justice...
November 21, 2019 at 14:15
:point: :up: That's very similar to the point I'm making. Theory ladened perceptual features are still about their content; they are a relation betwee...
November 21, 2019 at 08:50
Original argument is stupid crap. What's ownership in the Treatise? Whoops I seem to have found one of those widely occurrent natural phenomena, the g...
November 20, 2019 at 19:13
I wrote a synopsis of Friston's general approach outlined in the linked paper here. In terms of how they relate to external events/the environmental s...
November 20, 2019 at 12:33
Aye. I saw that in the paper. I couldn't really tease out how a conceptual scheme could be "in the large part, true" other than thinking of it has an ...
November 20, 2019 at 09:32
I think that's about right, at least on how Davidson's using "conceptual scheme". It might also be that a conceptual scheme is implicated in how conte...
November 19, 2019 at 19:13
Oh, that post was motivated to get the discussion back on what I see as the central issue. The scheme-content distinction. The "red herrings" I highli...
November 19, 2019 at 18:21
I'm very grateful for any time that you spend with my questions, and I hope that you have a fun time interacting with strangers interested in your wor...
November 19, 2019 at 18:17
That's part of it, yeah. Didn't see @"Moliere"'s equally excellent second one. Were you informing me of Moliere's excellent posts because you wanted t...
November 19, 2019 at 17:50
There are a lot of things we can get hung up about here. One is whether conceptual schemes only cash out in effects on language use. This is a red her...
November 19, 2019 at 17:27
Doubt any thought process that leads you to believe your thinking is globally unreliable. Either that thought process is reliable or it isn't, if it's...
November 19, 2019 at 15:42
I'd be interested in hashing out an experimental design with you at some point if you'd be interested.
November 16, 2019 at 11:55
Boring. It was boring. I've done some free time coding looking at equilibrium distributions of random variables on dynamical random graphs; in these c...
November 16, 2019 at 10:38
I guess fundamentally the point of relevance is that humans are not just recipients of hidden states, we are creators of them - active perception both...
November 16, 2019 at 10:01