Ducks, in the sense of independently existing objects, aren't even "available" (scare quote) for us to call them "duck" though. in Kant though! What c...
Alright. What are you struggling to understand in my post, and I'll do my best to rephrase it. Like , I also noticed that the phenomenon/noumenon or p...
How would you tell if one conceptual reality is different from another in the first place? You seem to allow it to admit of degrees ("completely"), so...
It's Immanuel. I appreciate the attempt to make Kant's terms clearer. Though I think you're dealing with the more general dichotomy between representa...
The primary difference, as I see it, is that if someone uses a shite source but puts it in their own words, the person's spent a shitload of time doin...
I've read a bunch of Thinking and Being now, and I'm getting the impression it was written in an alternate timeline. It seems to be responding to prob...
I use it for programming. It's also okay-ish at regurgitating commonly known things which are everywhere on the internet. I use it to come up with que...
Consult with it, then write your own post. You can use it to help you write the post. You need to check what it's saying if it comes up with citations...
Yes. it's to stop exchanges being like this forever. Took 10 minutes, appears truthy, is wrong in lots of subtle and not so subtle ways. But you're no...
I encourage users to flag explicit or seeming uses of chatGPT or other bots that they see. They may turn out to be fine, it just makes it easier to ke...
@"Pierre-Normand" - I see you use it a lot, I just wanted to tag you in thread to make sure you're aware of the ruling. While personally I think your ...
It repeats common misconceptions and flubs details constantly. It's especially bad at sourcing. It is also far too agreeable. You can easily talk it i...
Some clarifying remarks: Using it as a writing assistant is fine, using its largely unguided output as your entire post is not fine. Using it as a sou...
@"keystone" As of a recent amendment to site guidelines, using ChatGPT as an academic source is grounds for a warning. You're not being warned for it ...
@"Srap Tasmaner" This is a related analogy, but is not exactly what is going on in the thread. Kimhi's forces aren't quite illocutionary forces, we're...
@"Banno" @"Pierre-Normand" I was thinking (surprise). This is about how to ground force "in" the territory of a proposition understood as a set of equ...
To be clear - are you saying that there is common content between the assertion and rejection but that this common content is inexpressible as (some) ...
Lemme see if I get this right. Trying to pick it apart to understand it. The note is G. Jack identifies it as G# Jill identifies it as Ab. G# and Ab a...
What have I said which has given you the impression that I like the forms? I don't mean that in an accusing or rebuking manner, I legitimately don't u...
I think we'd want to call it "the same inference" in some contexts and not in others. Bad reasoning might infer Q from P, and good reasoning might inf...
@"Srap Tasmaner" @"Pierre-Normand" Rejection being irreducible to asserting a negation in some contexts is fairly straightforward as an idea right. A)...
I should've asked before too, sorry, what do you want to get out of the discussions too? But thanks for clarifying. I think fellow students and strang...
This is some rambling. Belief in a story would be a different flavour of belief than the one in this thread anyway. Telling a story is, at least, a se...
Can there even be an answer using speech act properties alone for that? The sense of nonreality afforded to fiction is surely something closer to inta...
That makes sense. The type of bias involved reminds me of founder effects. In which a diversity of initial properties in one contexts transforms into ...
Yes, what makes being able to hold those norms in suspense IRL useful is also what makes it rude to do so in most circumstances. You challenge how thi...
You learn ways of thinking about the world by learning to use words. Sometimes the ways you learn think stop you from questioning things you should qu...
That's very kind of you to highlight. I'm not expecting responses personally, and I encourage you - as a mod - to take whatever time you need to respo...
I suppose appears was inopportune. I meant to say that the reader is invited to interpret Sally to be asserting that it is raining, and invited to int...
One way it seems relevant is that understanding the sentence as weird and contradictory on a gut level... pumps the intuition that it must function as...
Just for the specific sentence "It is raining but I believe it is not raining", taken as a stand alone. When you read that, you can understand it. Eve...
If I'm part of that "we", I see a relatively clear but restrictive theory proposed as Frege's in and clarified wonderfully in . I wanted to put some p...
This is a precise question, thank you. "Does it?" and "were you asserting it?" seem to be a false dichotomy to me. There is another possibility. Readi...
Fun thread. I bolded "a" in the quote since, if I read it right, you're construing Frege's view that every proposition cannot contain assertoric force...
Comments