You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

fdrake

Comments

I replied to you in a new thread.
September 22, 2017 at 17:59
I'll respond in another thread.
September 22, 2017 at 16:57
The notion that it is 'repeated' is absent from the measure theoretic definition. The 'long-run frequency' interpretation of probability is actually c...
September 22, 2017 at 16:52
The reason I used intuitive rather than mathematical description was because nobody knows what sigma algebras and measureable functions are.
September 22, 2017 at 16:27
Ok. This is a random variable: Let (O,S,P) be a probability space where O is a set of outcomes and S a sigma algebra on the set of outcomes, then a ra...
September 22, 2017 at 16:22
I did not intend you to feel intimidated or patronised, so please try to be less aggressive. My posts aren't intended to be parts of academic papers, ...
September 22, 2017 at 15:56
Have you taken a class in measure and probability theory?
September 22, 2017 at 15:28
I'm a statistician.
September 22, 2017 at 15:24
I wrote that post.
September 22, 2017 at 15:22
It's a summary of the mathematical definition of random variables and probability in terms of measure theory. Here are a few references. When mathemat...
September 22, 2017 at 15:17
Mathematically probability doesn't have to resemble either 'the long term frequency of events' or 'a representation of a subjective degree of belief a...
September 22, 2017 at 14:45
Emotions being required for decision making has already been covered, but your first sentence in the post: can be addressed further. It's quite well u...
September 20, 2017 at 20:21
I didn't mean to suggest that this surface level observation of a current cultural malaise sufficed for an analysis. You're right in suggesting that t...
September 20, 2017 at 16:14
There are a lot of things to respond to in your post, but I can give you two immediate thoughts that I had. The disorientation you describe I think is...
September 20, 2017 at 12:35
I suppose that means you can't defend your assertions any more.
September 20, 2017 at 03:09
What other interpretations can there be for your statement: ?
September 20, 2017 at 03:08
Claiming that the laws are changing also requires evidence. To be consistent with current physics, all changes must be within experimental error for a...
September 20, 2017 at 03:01
You probably didn't read most of my posts in the thread fully, but uncertainty principles occur in lots of contexts. Every time you have a sequence of...
September 20, 2017 at 02:43
No, we have evidence over a very long period of time. We, roughly, have a paradigm in physics called quantum mechanics which has been around for just ...
September 20, 2017 at 02:30
I don't actually believe that it's necessary for them to be fixed. If you look at the start of the universe it's predicted that the four fundamental f...
September 20, 2017 at 02:16
Can you give me some examples of how I have been dogmatic?
September 20, 2017 at 02:05
dogmatism, noun: the tendency to lay down principles as undeniably true, without consideration of evidence or the opinions of others. I don't think I ...
September 20, 2017 at 02:00
I think that post serves as an ad-absurdum for your position. You actually seem committed to the idea that the bone observed now is not the same bone ...
September 20, 2017 at 01:37
Despite thinking your argument strategy is invalid, and providing a post showing as such, I'll play your game! 1) So you agree it's the same bone now ...
September 20, 2017 at 01:16
I find it interesting that you responded solely to the trollish bait. Why isn't the observation of a millions of years old bone with a similar chemica...
September 20, 2017 at 00:45
Bones of dinosaurs predate humans. Bones of dinosaurs are chemically much the same as human bones. There, an observation of a phenomenon from millions...
September 20, 2017 at 00:36
You never use logic? :-O The constancy of nature is a far weaker claim than nature being already described by an immutable set of equations. All that ...
September 20, 2017 at 00:17
I have already addressed this argument. It boils down to the following structure: 1) There is no written record that X influences Y before time t. 2) ...
September 19, 2017 at 23:59
Evidence that there is a world before animal life which obeys the same laws of physics - red-shift. Evidence that consciousness is not necessary for a...
September 19, 2017 at 23:35
I forgot to address 'interpretations require consciousness'. This is in the context of whether consciousness is required for observation/measurement. ...
September 19, 2017 at 22:23
1) There are no written records of . 2) There are no written records of before time t. 3)There is no evidence that X influences Y. t must be after now...
September 19, 2017 at 22:06
There is absolutely evidence that the laws of physics haven't changed since before animal life emerged. For one, the theory of red-shifts makes predic...
September 19, 2017 at 21:29
The universe hasn't changed in terms of physical laws since animal life emerged. This means there are properties or processes that allow the fuzzy qua...
September 19, 2017 at 20:33
Whether reality is random or not doesn't have depend solely on the realism of the wavefunction or derived probabilities. There are plenty of examples ...
September 18, 2017 at 16:28
I would like to say to start with that if probability's interpretation is a quantification of uncertainty, then randomness is trivially part of every ...
September 17, 2017 at 20:58
Any examples of papers with particularly bad methodology?
December 08, 2015 at 18:44
I get the feeling, just from the Simondon link you sent, that Simondon is proposing a methodological change in the way we think about ontogenesis. Fro...
November 03, 2015 at 21:31
I take it that would be prohibitively costly. Edit: Regardless, thanks for asking though. Should've checked the thread before coming here!
November 02, 2015 at 20:25
Is there Latex support? Can I somehow write things like: \sum_{n=1}^{\inf} \frac{1}{n^2} = \frac{\pi^2}{6} ?
November 02, 2015 at 19:59
Would you prefer to receive the response I'm making in the other thread in this one?
November 02, 2015 at 19:43
Reading. Will have something to say soon.
October 29, 2015 at 21:50
Quoting out of order because it best illustrates my point. This is also off topic at this point... I don't think it's possible to give a philosophical...
October 28, 2015 at 19:03
Glad we are on the same page. Fundamentally I don't see the point in this kind of inquiry insofar as it's speculative though. Will try and flesh that ...
October 27, 2015 at 19:13
I don't think this is right. Imagine that someone has made a list of justifications (call this set J) for a statement about something and this suffice...
October 24, 2015 at 19:59
This is reminiscent of J.J Gibson's idea of affordances. Namely that to perceive a thing is to perceive the actions that it may promote. "If a terrest...
October 24, 2015 at 19:33
I suppose such a commonality would have to be a very abstract one. How abstract? Maybe this can be delimited by finding something that couldn't in pri...
October 24, 2015 at 13:06
This. A friend and I started a discussion forum for Leftist literature a few years ago. While it had less than 50 members was the most productive time...
October 24, 2015 at 12:50
I think it should be regarded as a speech act rather than just a truth apt declaration. If someone actually says that, it's got a certain set of illoc...
October 24, 2015 at 12:35
Reporting in. Despite lurking most of the time it's nice to be here.
October 24, 2015 at 12:18