You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Pfhorrest

Comments

As I said before, it's precisely as useful a statement as naturalism is. To a necessitarian naturalist (of which I am also one), any object cannot hel...
March 09, 2020 at 00:36
Oh right, that problem. I didn't recognize it by name before; I think the capitalization threw me off, maybe. Anyway, I gave my answer to that above: ...
March 09, 2020 at 00:26
It's not so much of a wish, as a wonder. But yeah, sometimes it is a wish too. I have very well-defined positions now, but I have moved through many d...
March 09, 2020 at 00:20
Thanks! Fluidity and rigidity are those kinds of abstractions I have no problem with. If you just model the mechanical interactions of molecules, you ...
March 08, 2020 at 18:02
Functionalism about access consciousness, panpsychism about phenomenal consciousness.
March 08, 2020 at 07:43
Hahah, thanks :)
March 08, 2020 at 04:34
He implied that the US is letting potential tyrants run for president. I’m wondering which person(s) he thinks are potential tyrants running for presi...
March 08, 2020 at 02:44
The functionality of things is what groups them. The way information flows through systems, the causal connectedness or isolation of them. And phenome...
March 08, 2020 at 02:40
“Free will” in an incompatibilist sense is a bad thing anyway. You want compatibilist free will, which would not be lost in heaven.
March 07, 2020 at 22:30
That’s all about access consciousness. Functionality. Phenomenal consciousness is something much less interesting.
March 07, 2020 at 22:21
Who exactly do you have in mind?
March 07, 2020 at 19:16
Admitting uncertainty even in the face of what looks like an obvious answer and then investigating it anyway is what makes scientists “smart”.
March 07, 2020 at 18:48
It is impossible to do science without agreement on foundational things like empiricism and realism and some form of rationalism (as in rejecting appe...
March 07, 2020 at 18:42
Everything that exists.
March 07, 2020 at 18:29
Access consciousness is a functional property that only applies to things with the requisite functionality. Phenomenal consciousness is nothing more t...
March 07, 2020 at 07:55
I just realized that I forgot to ask for one rather important piece of feedback, which thankfully has not applied to the five essay thus far, but will...
March 07, 2020 at 04:40
(as toilet paper, implying printing onto paper) (you print something, that something being bad posts, that have been posted to this web site; not that...
March 07, 2020 at 02:06
I have noticed that, especially in politics, where right-wing people disagreeing with me feels trivial, because of course they do, while other left-wi...
March 07, 2020 at 00:08
Why do those ones deserve an exception? The physical sciences we have today began as a branch of philosophy, "natural philosophy", that pretty much so...
March 06, 2020 at 23:18
FiveThirtyEight has finally updated their election odds predictor with Super Tuesday results, and it's showing Biden with close to 90% odds of having ...
March 06, 2020 at 23:14
There are certainly cases where neither of some alternatives are morally obligatory, but agreement on them is still valuable; the road-side case is on...
March 06, 2020 at 23:09
Thanks! :) (No time to reply in more detail now, off to bed time).
March 06, 2020 at 09:52
Indirectly tangential from the conversation that ensued from this, I've added a bit to this essay Against NIhilism clarifying relativism vs objectivis...
March 06, 2020 at 09:50
Yeah, that's generally what I experience here. Although, not so much the thing about non-commutative agreement, but agreement and disagreement on diff...
March 06, 2020 at 09:16
That's a textbook case of survivorship bias. You're looking at how many people who did escape poverty did so through individual initiative. What we're...
March 06, 2020 at 09:00
No, it's a meta-ethical question. Just like the foundations of the physical sciences are found in answers to meta-physical questions (broadly, includi...
March 06, 2020 at 08:27
"Nuh uh" isn't an argument. You're just stated your disagreement, not said anything to refute my explanation of how interest (not just lending) is nec...
March 06, 2020 at 08:22
(I had accidentally written something here that belongs in another thread instead)
March 06, 2020 at 08:18
That's beside the point. The point is that someone who only has $5 safely saved up ("safely" as in money that they don't need to keep out of risky inv...
March 06, 2020 at 04:35
I said exactly that, yes. And note the words "at interest", which are very important. Lending interest-free is certainly helpful behavior. Lending at ...
March 06, 2020 at 03:12
My analysis of the root flaw of capitalism could be phrased as "all lending (at interest) is predatory". There are degrees, of course, what we normall...
March 06, 2020 at 00:01
March 05, 2020 at 23:40
It's not utilitarianism. Do the criteria of success for a system of science themselves belong in the science category? Must you have a scientific judg...
March 05, 2020 at 23:32
That's completely besides the point, which is disappointing because you seemed to have gotten the point before. Say there is a simple gambling game wh...
March 05, 2020 at 23:12
That's not how the steps we just walked through work out.
March 05, 2020 at 19:44
I sense sarcasm here but I'm not quite discerning your point out of it. In any case, my point was that hedonism as a philosophical principle isn't sel...
March 05, 2020 at 09:32
What you said upthread sounded like you were talking about desires more than appetites. "An average of what people think pleasurable" (what they think...
March 05, 2020 at 08:01
There are similarities, but also a lot of sophisticated differences, that make all of the difference. Most of this was covered in the bit of my Codex ...
March 05, 2020 at 05:24
Okay great. And you said earlier that more risk comes with greater rewards. Combine those two things then: the more wealth you have, the more risk you...
March 05, 2020 at 04:22
My point is that ethical and moral judgements are wrongly held to be not "objectively measurable", and that the same kind of processes by which we tea...
March 05, 2020 at 04:13
The more wealth you have, the more risk you can afford to take. If there is some gamble you can take where for 49% of the time you lose everything and...
March 05, 2020 at 03:53
That depends entirely on the situation. If you are in a disadvantaged minority (not necessarily racial, just numerically) facing some kind of systemic...
March 05, 2020 at 03:35
It's not at all about power, it's about getting the policy results you want. Say the thing you care about is the well-being of puppies. - Candidate A ...
March 05, 2020 at 03:26
Carlos, the thing that you really seem to miss here, which should really be obvious because it's a basic tenet of mainstream capitalist economics that...
March 05, 2020 at 02:40
And the fact that the greatest predictor of a child’s future wealth is the wealth of their parents doesn’t contradict that at all?
March 05, 2020 at 02:06
It totally is if they can’t find a high enough income or low enough living expenses to live more than check to check. Which apparently most Americans ...
March 05, 2020 at 01:49
Thanks, I took that as complimentary. And don’t fault yourself for not finding a cheap deal in rent yet: by definition they are hard to come by, and i...
March 05, 2020 at 01:38
I’m still not sure I will be able to retire at all, never mind “and then some”, off of even twice a median income. In the past seven years since I las...
March 05, 2020 at 00:55
Strategic voting is about not making perfect the enemy of good. Say there are three candidates, A, B, and C. A if your favorite candidate. B has probl...
March 04, 2020 at 22:16