You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

So to the end of part three: I find myself agreeing with Barcan, that Quine is mistaken to think the choice is between an Aristotelian essentialism an...
March 04, 2025 at 02:32
If you like. Your example shows the unfalsifiabilty of objects of faith, which is the crux of my post. Any arguments or evidence to the contrary are r...
March 04, 2025 at 02:01
Where did that nonsense come from? No. Cheers.
March 04, 2025 at 00:21
Two beliefs: Pat believes that "god exists" is true Pat believes that "god does not exist" is true. In both cases, Pat holds a certain proposition to ...
March 03, 2025 at 23:48
This is what needs tracing out, to be sure. In considering this I have been struck by how accessibility in modal logic resembles a Markov process, wit...
March 03, 2025 at 23:45
Thank you. I very much appreciate this simple gesture towards agreement.
March 03, 2025 at 23:32
OK. In probability theory possible worlds are elements in a sample space, which consists in all possible outcomes of some experiment. These possible w...
March 03, 2025 at 23:10
I would be happy to continue the conversation were I able to make sense of your position, but your thoughts rattle around in a hurricane of different ...
March 03, 2025 at 22:26
Yet if faith, or any belief, is to enter into our ratiocinations, it must be put in to propositional form. In particular, if it is to explain our acti...
March 03, 2025 at 22:22
, , in probability theory the possible worlds are the outcome of a stochastic process, a coin flip or whatever. But in Modal Logic possible worlds are...
March 03, 2025 at 22:10
You place a lot of weight in intuition. What, then, if my intuition differs from yours? Which is to be preferred? What would one make of someone who s...
March 03, 2025 at 21:53
Oh, I can see the problem. Cheers.
March 03, 2025 at 21:20
Still very unclear. What is believed is expressed by a proposition, rather than a "thing", an object. The other two of your three bolded sentences are...
March 03, 2025 at 08:04
A facebook page that might be worth keeping an eye on. https://www.facebook.com/IndependentNewsAU Orange is bush teal?
March 03, 2025 at 05:45
In all the possible worlds in which green conscripts were effective in battle, Napoleon had first trained them into a disciplined army. It's just acce...
March 03, 2025 at 01:49
When you use "you" after addressing both Egg and I, it is unclear who "you" refers to. The interesting bit in your post was the hint that we might tre...
March 03, 2025 at 01:38
Does the question "Which is the real value of A?" make sense?
March 02, 2025 at 23:01
The bulk of part three places Quine's position in a few historical arguments involving Church, Carnap, Lewis and particularly, Barcan. (37) is curious...
March 02, 2025 at 22:27
Argumentum ad youtube...
March 02, 2025 at 21:47
@"DifferentiatingEgg", from where I sit the argument owes more to David Lewis, mentioned in one of my earlier threads. But you will see it through you...
March 02, 2025 at 07:43
So much the worse for Nietzsche, then.
March 01, 2025 at 23:34
Unfortunately, that wasn't hard.
March 01, 2025 at 22:56
You have to take something as granted, yes. That's a long way from what is involved in faith. One can review what one takes as granted, but to review ...
March 01, 2025 at 22:54
Or faith is the antithesis of rationality.
March 01, 2025 at 22:42
Only if you choose to view it as such. But if you have a choice, better not to spend your time here. I'm off to plant some flowers.
March 01, 2025 at 22:40
SO let's check out the consequences of this view. Belief is holding that something is true. One can believe that something is true for all sorts of re...
March 01, 2025 at 22:36
Philosophy is a pointless endeavour.
March 01, 2025 at 21:53
The sound changed in pitch. What changed? The sound. What was self-identical (a phrase that only a philosopher would use)? The sound, the tone, the no...
March 01, 2025 at 21:50
:roll:
March 01, 2025 at 01:19
Wouldn't it be wonderful to hear the sounds the workers made building the classical structures of Egypt?
March 01, 2025 at 01:17
The pitch moved from D to E.
March 01, 2025 at 00:36
There's your first mistake - thinking the USA is democratic...
February 28, 2025 at 23:53
Yep.
February 28, 2025 at 23:31
So sound is not a physical thing. I give up.
February 28, 2025 at 23:24
I don't see what to make of this. In your own words, and Measurements might well be discrete. The sound is not. Volume or pitch move. Well, if you do ...
February 28, 2025 at 23:23
"May be...'. We make maximum sense of the words of others when optimise agreement. It remains that sometimes what folk believe is different to how thi...
February 28, 2025 at 22:27
What is to count as a part and what as a whole here? Here's a bit of tab for a slide... https://assets.yousician.com/app/uploads/2019/09/20131021/guit...
February 28, 2025 at 22:01
Not Banno. Physics and mathematics. Meta is unable to understand basic calculus. He and Corvus should have fun together. Yes, Meta, I was pointing out...
February 28, 2025 at 21:40
Yep. Or almost. The tone moved up, or down. Which tone moved up? That one. Then it moved down. The tone of that tone changed... The first "tone" is an...
February 28, 2025 at 03:44
Maybe listen to more slide? Why shouldn't a tone move? Why restrict movement to physical objects alone, or to changes in place. The PIE root is *meu?-...
February 28, 2025 at 03:03
ok.
February 28, 2025 at 00:56
It seems you are far to clever to be understood.
February 27, 2025 at 23:41
, So... you have a personal preference for a complete answer that is wrong over an incomplete answer that is right? Why should I care.
February 27, 2025 at 23:24
Good to see the local Christians all getting on so well.
February 27, 2025 at 22:16
I've no idea what that post says.
February 27, 2025 at 20:42
OK.
February 27, 2025 at 00:53
The mechanism is the stipulation.
February 27, 2025 at 00:41
I'm not seeing this as a problem for Quine, or for Kripke. It could as well be settled by saying "Ok, We'll call this one "Fred", and that one "Harry"...
February 27, 2025 at 00:23
Well, "In some possible world, what if Sam were not X?" is a question about Sam... Keep in mind that the casual theory of reference was a quick explan...
February 27, 2025 at 00:11