You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

It's raining, so I'll play with the notion of faith a bit more. An exercise from J. L. Austin is to look up a key term in a dictionary, then look up e...
April 27, 2025 at 00:38
frankly I think you would benefit from some study of formal logic. Think on that for a bit. Why shouldn't there be rules that apply in one world, but ...
April 27, 2025 at 00:13
This didn't come up on my notifications. Odd. Starting a discussion with a definition is usually a mistake. It turns the conversation into a fight ove...
April 27, 2025 at 00:03
In: The Forms  — view comment
Well, no, it doesn't. It deals with it by clarifying what's going on in metaphysical chat. That Kant made much the same error as Plato is not all that...
April 26, 2025 at 03:21
In: The Forms  — view comment
So 'Wayfarer" is a universal? No. That doesn't follow, and he doesn't, anyway. Back to playing with 'exists'. If a 'ligatures of reason' is logical st...
April 26, 2025 at 03:05
In: The Forms  — view comment
Thanks. A thoughtful reply. I'm struck by how much this is an evaluation. And an evaluation that debases the physical world. A hierarchy, the commons ...
April 26, 2025 at 01:05
In: The Forms  — view comment
apparently you missed quite a bit. Cheers.
April 26, 2025 at 00:08
In: The Forms  — view comment
More a matter of coherence.
April 25, 2025 at 23:57
In: The Forms  — view comment
Thanks for clarifying. It's the general picture to which I would draw attention, much the same as the quote Wittgenstein used as his starting block in...
April 25, 2025 at 23:56
Yep. The slippery slope. You need faith to fly a plane, so why not have faith in the Trinity - as if these were on par. There are multiple uses of the...
April 25, 2025 at 23:21
In: The Forms  — view comment
On the contrary, I think it clear to what Plato was pointing, but that he was mistaken.
April 25, 2025 at 23:11
No. I said the marker of faith is holding on to a belief - that your friend will pick you up or that the bread is flesh - despite the evidence. We are...
April 25, 2025 at 23:10
That's all? For all my efforts? At least let me know if you agree, and if not, perhaps where and why. Or was your aim just to drag me back into this m...
April 25, 2025 at 22:59
I'm not seeing that this is useful, nor how it makes a difference, nor indeed how it might count against what I wrote. But I do not grant your definit...
April 25, 2025 at 22:58
In: The Forms  — view comment
It isn't. But reifying it is. You've had a read, I hope, of Austin's Are There A Priori Concepts?. I've mentioned it so many times over the years. I c...
April 25, 2025 at 22:38
I haven't been following this discussion. I've pretty much said what I thought already. So my answer here may well be out of context. We might agree t...
April 25, 2025 at 22:21
In: The Forms  — view comment
He said a bit more than just that. As Hanover pointed out, he held that true knowledge is knowledge of the forms, and developed a proto-scientific met...
April 25, 2025 at 22:02
In: The Forms  — view comment
One can see and respect the merit of Plato's ideas - and ideals - without accepting them. His is a brilliant account. There is a difference between un...
April 25, 2025 at 21:09
In: The Forms  — view comment
That the forms rest on a mistaken theory of reference is not a theory about Plato's motivation. It's nto that Plato invented the Forms because he misu...
April 25, 2025 at 20:47
In: The Forms  — view comment
I agree. Nothing to see here.
April 25, 2025 at 02:10
How merciful.
April 25, 2025 at 02:09
In: The Forms  — view comment
If that were so, the notion of 'reification" would be rendered senseless. If nothing is concrete, then there could be no making something abstract mor...
April 25, 2025 at 02:08
The usual problem of evil is that a theistic god who creates hell is not a nice person; the Lewis extension to that is that those who worship such a g...
April 24, 2025 at 04:15
And Lewis' argument shows that the folk who accept this are wicked. or at least insensitive.
April 24, 2025 at 03:01
Is there such a crisis? Sure, @"Wayfarer" says there is, but the crisis seems on analysis to be just that folk disagree with his view. So, what's the ...
April 24, 2025 at 01:59
So what. An eternal punishment for a transient sin is proportional? Not seeing it.
April 24, 2025 at 01:57
Cheers. I stand corrected. Yet what is it that was supposedly lost? The god botherers have taken to posting en masse; a symptom of something... but wh...
April 24, 2025 at 00:54
In: The Forms  — view comment
The theory of forms is an application of a mistaken theory of reference. That theory holds that names refer to things, and that therefore, if there is...
April 24, 2025 at 00:15
The "idea that if God exists, he must operate like a benevolent manager of human well-being" is not something to which folk outside of the theistic tr...
April 24, 2025 at 00:11
I would characterise the thread quite differently. You can read Lewis' argument and comment on it. The punishment of the damned is infinitely dispropo...
April 23, 2025 at 23:18
Indeed, the world behaves pretty much as one would expect, if there were no god. Theodicy is the study of excuses for how this can be so.
April 23, 2025 at 22:23
Folk have a misguided view of the effectiveness of punishment. Evidence shows that being certain that they will be caught has a much higher deterrent ...
April 23, 2025 at 22:11
One Nation and the Liberal Party have apparently done a vote deal. Hanson has pulped how to vote cards in order to put the Liberals ahead of Teals. Li...
April 22, 2025 at 23:31
The master of slide put it like this... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8fFdc-karA ...looks like a request for a discussion of the nature of free spe...
April 22, 2025 at 22:44
Goodonya. Still deciding between green and indi in the reps, but probably Pocock in the senate.
April 22, 2025 at 11:18
The third debate was sold as avoiding the talking points, but consist in questions aimed at evoking talking points... Yawn.
April 22, 2025 at 09:50
Sky news, after a few days of begrudging headlines suggesting that the polls indicate the Libs might not win, have today turned on the Teals.
April 22, 2025 at 01:27
We need to take care to seperate logically possible worlds form physically possible worlds. There are finite possible worlds, logically speaking, if t...
April 22, 2025 at 00:36
Pretty much. But in the scenario of the OP, that replacement does not occur. Therefore harm is done to the parents. It's pretty deaf to Singer's argum...
April 21, 2025 at 23:48
I agree. Provocative, that a year ago we were toying with these word-stringers, and how we are now in a position to compare and contrast various "arti...
April 20, 2025 at 00:04
Meh. I'll be voting early for reasons of simple convenience. Those who would change their vote because of some last minute change in policy place too ...
April 19, 2025 at 23:37
It's your argument, but that's not how I read it. The argument in a nutshell appears to be that genocidal infanticide would for Singer morally neutral...
April 19, 2025 at 23:34
:smirk: Did anyone expect more? Hope not.
April 19, 2025 at 22:28
:rofl: Some of what I offer instead.
April 19, 2025 at 04:34
Yep. The main source is Practical Ethics. Now somewhat dated. Here's a sympathetic piece on trying to understand Singer: What I learned about disabili...
April 19, 2025 at 03:56
To exist might well be to stand in a relation to something else - perhaps this would be one way to understand Quine, for example. But to restrict the ...
April 19, 2025 at 02:17
Not that clearly. It suggests the unlikely situation where the parents are OK with having their infants killed. We might pass such circumstances over....
April 19, 2025 at 02:11
I'm not a fan of consequentialism, but the OP shows a poor understanding of Singer's approach. Put simply, the parents of those infants would be a bit...
April 18, 2025 at 22:10
In response to 's thread... Not too shabby, actually. The first and second paragraphs hints at the wrestle with personhood found in his more recent wr...
April 18, 2025 at 22:01
Excellent. So we have the chair, and an ill- defined notion of one even following another. Which is more real? Which, more intelligible?
April 18, 2025 at 02:20