You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

No, I quit like Soul. Blues, too.
May 18, 2021 at 22:28
Of course god is unknowable. Nothing worthwhile can be said about the ineffable. Sorta goes with the territory. But if we are to follow this to it's c...
May 18, 2021 at 22:17
Why should I answer that? What is the point to this discussion? Here's my thesis, a myth rather than an argument: Folk noticed that breathing was abse...
May 18, 2021 at 22:11
How? You want reasons?You want to express the inexpressible. It's either obvious, or not. Either way, silence is the only reasonable response.
May 18, 2021 at 22:00
That's your convention. Why should we adopt it? But the topic is contested use. So your response is useless.
May 18, 2021 at 21:36
That's just a very poor choice of word. A Doctrine, creed, dogma... the implication of explicit rules. It's pretty much exactly wrong to suggest that ...
May 18, 2021 at 21:35
Ownership is conventional. When folk disagree as to the conventions in play, there can be no final arbiter.
May 18, 2021 at 21:18
Predictable, that reactionary attacks on the person are the mainstay of those who feel their gender identity threatened.
May 18, 2021 at 21:16
That's a bit selective. Isn't it "God does not reveal himself in the world"? I'd also question the notion hat Witti had an "ethical Doctrine"; pretty ...
May 18, 2021 at 21:13
Well, no. You've framed the issue in an absurd way. Just go read some actual biological texts, and try to understand the topic before you expound on i...
May 18, 2021 at 21:04
Indeed, Indeed. No wonder you don't wish to address them. I think I've accompanied you far enough up your garden path for this evening. Cheers.
May 18, 2021 at 10:21
Well, it would imply that moral statements were not truth apt... and it seems that they are truth apt. Hence, there is something amiss with his accoun...
May 18, 2021 at 10:13
I have said as much, previously, and in other threads. What of it? I've said the OP is interesting because the answer is not obvious.
May 18, 2021 at 10:05
This is not so far from what I said here: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/537565
May 18, 2021 at 10:01
I disagree with what Wittgenstein says there.
May 18, 2021 at 10:00
No; when I say breath, I mean breath.
May 18, 2021 at 09:50
https://www.livescience.com/48103-evolution-not-random.html https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13698-evolution-myths-evolution-is-random/ https://...
May 18, 2021 at 09:49
Evolution.
May 18, 2021 at 09:42
Sure. Do you have a point?
May 18, 2021 at 09:36
Repeating your mistake does not help your case.
May 18, 2021 at 09:35
DO you have the popcorn?
May 18, 2021 at 09:01
Ok, you go for it. Dirt particles settle in a fluid how they want to. If that's what you need in order to make your philosophy work, you are too far u...
May 18, 2021 at 08:20
Put some dirt in a jar. of water. Shake it. The smaller particles will move to the top, the larger to the bottom. The particles move in a "...demonstr...
May 18, 2021 at 07:50
Why?
May 18, 2021 at 07:31
Why is this simple fact about evolution so difficult for some folk? It's as if, given that the Irish Lottery is decided at random, MadFool were to con...
May 18, 2021 at 04:32
"The breath of our times"... works for me. "Spirit" is breath taken as metaphor then... re-reified... so as to produce myth.
May 18, 2021 at 04:10
Yes, etymology provides a feast for understanding the way concepts move and change over time. Check out https://www.etymonline.com/search?q=ghost ...w...
May 18, 2021 at 04:07
Do you? Why? I don't understand the need to categorise and name - doing philosophy as if it were entomology. It's as if one reached a conclusion and o...
May 18, 2021 at 03:55
Life has to have a goal? Like it was a bloody football game? Madness.
May 18, 2021 at 01:44
Excluding the question...? Yes, the question was excluded because interrogatives are not truth-apt. SO we'd get something like my satiny lying is wron...
May 18, 2021 at 01:37
Have you been peeking at the SEP article? I really do not have an answer here. In that regard it is an ongoing issues. I'm very disinclined to say out...
May 18, 2021 at 00:51
Well, I was standing at the intersection when an elegant gentleman offered me a deal...
May 17, 2021 at 23:45
Redundancy. ...and yet they are commonly thought to be so. Further, the basic T-sentence structure holds: "One ought do X" is true IFF one ought do X....
May 17, 2021 at 23:03
I've merely been responding to what you wrote. Whether you are in favour or against religion is of no relevance. was your supposed answer to my "What ...
May 17, 2021 at 22:39
Nice. I'd add something about the role of language...
May 17, 2021 at 09:45
An inexpressible truth? A lived truth can be stated. As can a truth that you feel in your bones. We will need to be clear about what is true, and how ...
May 17, 2021 at 09:27
Yep; now it seems to me that ...is quite acceptable. What I'd reject is the notion that truth is in all cases determined by correspondence. Hence, the...
May 17, 2021 at 09:17
I baulk at having a different sort of truth for science than for religion. Truth is truth. The you that awakes forma coma has the very same body as th...
May 17, 2021 at 08:55
Yeah. I've no time for this. Hume did not hold that morality proceeded from god. End of discussion.
May 17, 2021 at 08:36
It's an interesting topic. "...the thing that makes it true." I'm not sure that in the case of a moral statements, there is such a thing... But that's...
May 17, 2021 at 08:34
https://davidhume.org/texts/t/3/1/1 T 3.1.1.27, SBN 469-70. Odd, that you cited it, but can't check the context.
May 17, 2021 at 08:27
Sometimes my fingers move too slowly for my thoughts. Sometime my thoughts move too slowly for my fingers.
May 17, 2021 at 08:22
I suggest you look up the whole of the quote you cite.
May 17, 2021 at 08:21
...the one in which he rejects that assumption...
May 17, 2021 at 08:17