You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Banno

Comments

Isn't that oddly passive? A bit like puzzling over how the Philips Head driver just happens to fit a Philips head screw. We use language so that we ca...
October 14, 2024 at 00:02
I should have put this here: If God does not exist, then it is false that if I pray, then my prayers will be answered. So I do not pray. Therefore God...
October 13, 2024 at 23:50
Well, the little evidence I could find says otherwise. Here's an Ngram of interest. https://i.ibb.co/dKhWfnw/image.png The point is moot, since it is ...
October 13, 2024 at 23:17
A new term to me - no mentions in SEP or in IEP. Not just no article, but no use of the phrase. so I googled it. A couple of blogs, none of them very ...
October 13, 2024 at 22:20
's true, that.
October 13, 2024 at 08:47
Hmm. Pragmatism over all.
October 13, 2024 at 08:42
:razz: But what Russell is doing is a bit beyond all this - the next generation, if you will. She is considering: To be a law of logic, a principle mu...
October 13, 2024 at 08:23
Oh, and there are paraconsistent logics that are being used in non-woo quantum mechanics. It is a thing.
October 13, 2024 at 08:04
Yep, interesting stuff. In classical logic, A,~A ? B (From A and not A you can derive whatever you want). This would cause all sorts of problems. Para...
October 13, 2024 at 07:54
Yep - although the rigour is predominantly provided by mathematics rather than syllogism. And I sympathise with the conceit that science is essentiall...
October 13, 2024 at 05:44
Ohh, thank god! The horror! I was having such visions...
October 13, 2024 at 05:03
Goodness, that goes back a bit. I'd quite forgotten that thread. And a whole section was missing from the OP - I fixed it. Thanks.
October 13, 2024 at 03:57
I'm not sure what in Hack you are pointing to, but Feyerabend was an anti-science hero of the left, so there are probably some crossovers with Hack. A...
October 13, 2024 at 03:35
:lol: Welcome back. The thread became denecrotised as a result of a discussion elsewhere. This?
October 13, 2024 at 01:10
Yeah, and I think Wittgenstein would agree with you that it was a mistake. But for elsewhere. And yeah, there is something of modality in the Tractatu...
October 13, 2024 at 01:06
Both interesting questions. I don't have an answer - this is a developing area of enquiry. Russell borrows lemma incorporation from Lakatos, who was s...
October 13, 2024 at 00:34
It's where I came in. "One might see this as setting aside the "assertoric" aspect of the sentence in order to deal with other aspects of its structur...
October 12, 2024 at 23:53
Cheers. Leon. Sometime, take a read of the Russell article and maybe address it.
October 12, 2024 at 23:51
Meh. it ain't just me up this tree.
October 12, 2024 at 23:46
Perhaps. In part it come back to the place of the "?".... "We know that..." "It might be that...." "We believe that..." Just trying to get back on tas...
October 12, 2024 at 23:43
Cheers, Leon. That topic pretty much moved over to Logical Nihilism
October 12, 2024 at 23:36
You quote yourself more often than is healthy.
October 12, 2024 at 23:26
Continuing: The basic idea seems to be that modal statements say something, and can be true, so there must be a something to which they correspond - a...
October 12, 2024 at 23:07
That confusion was addressed in PI. But on that, as I recall, you disagree. The SEP article that @"frank" introduced has arguments - section 1.2 - for...
October 12, 2024 at 22:45
Well, no, I didn't, and the folk here are competent enough to understand the difference between "It's far from obvious that states of affairs are help...
October 12, 2024 at 22:30
Yep. I commented earlier that the emphasis hereabouts is Tractarian. The picture sitting between the statements and the world. It doesn't solve the pr...
October 12, 2024 at 22:09
Well, yes. What a statement sets out is a particular situation in the world. Do you then have three things, the true statement, the situation in the w...
October 12, 2024 at 21:51
SO how does a state of affairs differ from that which a statement sets out?
October 12, 2024 at 21:31
This is presumably non-trivial. What empirical inference made from observation of the real world is involved?
October 12, 2024 at 21:23
Wait... cooking a Greek Salad...?
October 12, 2024 at 21:18
Have you ever noticed that when someone sets out a state of affairs, they do it by setting out a statement? It's far from obvious that states of affai...
October 12, 2024 at 20:44
Yep.
October 11, 2024 at 23:36
You're welcome. (I've had a look around your recent essay - respect for putting the effort into an extended argument such as that, and taking the time...
October 11, 2024 at 22:49
That god is but doesn't exist? Just shows how very special you are...
October 11, 2024 at 22:14
Funny how muddled talk of god becomes. Best avoided.
October 11, 2024 at 21:33
Sure, all that is so. But 24 out of 1733. Here's the data, specifying not just the target group, for those specialising in continental philosophy in E...
October 11, 2024 at 21:04
The thing-in-itself is a cousin of Antigonish. The poem folds word over on themselves, talking about that about which we can say nothing. Quite witty,...
October 11, 2024 at 20:42
The meta data is available on the site, and can be broken down by nationality.
October 11, 2024 at 20:30
Something exists if it is in the domain of discourse. Frodo walked into Mordor, therefore there is something that walked into Mordor. Something is rea...
October 11, 2024 at 20:25
October 11, 2024 at 20:17
The only being that exists in every possible world is the oxymoron.
October 11, 2024 at 20:11
You're fixed on essentialism. It is clear that, ruling out mysticism, a blastocyst is not a person. Abortions on demand at least in early pregnancy ar...
October 11, 2024 at 20:05
Odd, this turn of phrase. Lucky for me? No. Since I am here it is inevitable that some zygote survived. No luck involved, just bland necessity. Any ot...
October 11, 2024 at 04:53
Well, ethics is about what we do. And I'm off to an art exhibit and lunch with friends. Not something that can be done with a zygote.
October 11, 2024 at 00:38
Oh, you are talking about the images? Yes, four different images. Images do not generally have rights, I believe - but you would know more about that....
October 11, 2024 at 00:31
They share some rights. In some, they may differ. Why do you ask? Do you disagree with ??
October 11, 2024 at 00:05
Dude, nothing in what I said limits abortion in that way. I would agree with "on demand" in at least the first trimester, and leave further restrictio...
October 10, 2024 at 23:52
Yeah. That sentence is about you. Here is a person: https://cdn.create.vista.com/api/media/small/250363326/stock-photo-smiling-attractive-woman-white-...
October 10, 2024 at 23:38
Which casts into doubt your capacity to recognise a good argument. We (you and I) seem to be mostly in agreement as to what ought be done. But you var...
October 10, 2024 at 23:30
Yeah, he lost me too.
October 10, 2024 at 23:22