No, you are a derailer who prefers to address me than anything in the OP. So, try again without- without - expressing your view about me. See if you c...
This is partial reply because I am about to go up mountain. OMG! i am not denying they're 'compatible'. Sheesh. I am saying that subjectivism does not...
Well that's false. The arguments I have made show that God's existence implies antinatalism. That's quite significant, as anyone with an inquiring min...
You're just confused. Realism in ethics, like I say, is the view that moral statements are truth apt and some of them are true. You are conflating rea...
Exactly what I'd expect to come out of a Hugh Janus. Here is how I defined naturalism: Note, then, metaethical naturalism broadly construed does, or c...
No it isn't. That isn't what the quote said. The quote said what I said. Do you have any expertise in this area, Hugh? Or do you not have the first id...
It's just the definition of moral realism. Moral realism 'just is' the view that moral statements are truth apt and some of them are true. Moral reali...
Yes. The point is that whether God's existence is compatible with the truth of antinatalism does not depend on whether or not God exists. For example,...
No, you are simply misunderstanding naturalism. The view that moral prescriptions come from individuals is individual subjectivism, not naturalism (as...
Turn your brains on and think. Why does possession of the omni properties imply God created everything?? Put down your bibles, dust off your reason an...
So, Hugh, if I tell myself to do x, it is necessarily right for me to do x? Look, this thread isn't about individual subjectivism about morality. For ...
Just read the OP and address something argued in it. Simple. Now, in the OP I argued that the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent b...
Yes, I know. But I didn't say 1 was false, did I? I said 2 was false. You're building a commitment to moral realism into individual moral subjectivism...
Well, you haven't thanked me. But okay, yes - you were wrong. That's what I said before and then again and then again. Here again, for the slow witted...
First thank me for explaining the blindingly obvious to you thus far. Like I say, I explain things for a living, but I'm not going to give you free le...
It is not unsolvable. That does not follow. Obviously we did not create ourselves (nor did God create himself). But it does not follow from God's omni...
Oh dear, and things were going so well between us, and with apologies to Frank Sinatra, "then you go and spoil it all by saying something stupid like:...
Assuming the truth of that which one was trying to show is not the same as assuming too much, for one can do the latter without doing the former. I ex...
Er no. Cast your mind back to when you were doing philosophy at woodwork college in 1812 with the 'respect philosopher' and try and remember what 'que...
Hmm, by my calculations you were at college (presumably woodwork) in the 1970s, so that would make you in your 70s today, or perhaps your 60s. Yet you...
Er, no. That's valid. This was the form your first argument took And that's invalid because it is invalid. Yet you don't know it. Not a good student t...
The same reason the first isn't. It doesn't conform to any of the 9 rules of inference that you don't know but are currently looking up. Now, do you h...
Yes, unfortunately I did waste time doing that. And you asked to be shown why your arguments were not 'valid'. We did not mention their soundness. But...
No, 'you' need guidance. You do not have to show that an argument's premises are 'false' to establish invalidity. An argument is invalid when its conc...
Oh, change the record you whiny creep. You're the bully. You're obsessed with 'me' and getting me - so far as I can tell the only proper philosopher o...
Included in the definition of a troll, according to the internet anyway, is "someone who intentionally....tries to instigate arguments in an online co...
No, that's not correct. 1 is true. But 2 is false - you are not committed to realism. I mean, admittedly it'd be quite odd to be a subjectivist and th...
So? I am interested in whether an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent's existence is consistent with antinatalism, and whether it positively implie...
Yes, you're a troll. You - like most of the others above - are not remotely interested in anything in the OP. Oh well, ho hum. Haha, nobody, but nobod...
'God' denotes an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent being. There's no dispute over that. And anyway, I stipulated that this is how I am using the ...
The clue to why lies in the conclusion of this valid argument: 1. If someone thinks Sir2u's arguments are valid, then that person is too dumb for fun ...
God. Water is made of tiny molecules, yes? That doesn't mean 'water' means 'tiny molecules'. This thread isn't about divine command theory, but the st...
To be honest, replying to you isn't worth the hassle as no matter what I say, you seem hell bent on telling me that I've said something else, and then...
Comments