You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Bartricks

Comments

Freud? The mucky cook or the artist? Or the PR guru? Or the TV presenter and Curtis wife? Or the fashion designer? Which one? I imagine they've all wr...
July 07, 2021 at 18:09
I don't read books. I write them. I ain't no reader loser. And I couldn't care less about IQ and have no idea what mine is. I think I'd break the test...
July 07, 2021 at 17:10
It is what it is. An astonishingly simple argument for a profound conclusion. God can make mistakes. Did Russell demonstrate that? No. Bartricks did. ...
July 07, 2021 at 16:51
You mean it is not healthy for you, as your ego can't cope? You don't want to learn anything, matey. You - like most people - want to be told what you...
July 07, 2021 at 16:44
More fallacious reasoning. I am so good at telling good arguments from bad ones that I do it for a living. You are very bad at it, so you can't see ho...
July 07, 2021 at 15:59
None of your thoughts are accurate. I don't think thinking is your thing.
July 07, 2021 at 15:48
Again, all you're doing is begging the question. Read the argument I gave in which it is shown exactly why being omniscient does not entail possessing...
July 07, 2021 at 15:44
An intelligent person would recognize that there are no logical problems in the OP. An arrogant fool with no proper philosophical training would, by c...
July 07, 2021 at 15:37
It was a simple IQ test, and you couldn't answer it. If your IQ was higher, you'd understand the OP. I have helped you as much as I can, but you are s...
July 07, 2021 at 15:33
The question - can God create a rock too heavy for him to lift? - is ambiguous. That is, it admits of two quite different interpretations ('de re' and...
July 07, 2021 at 15:26
Only way to have an intelligent discussion
July 07, 2021 at 08:55
Yes they are. They are favouring relations. Do you know what one of those is? It isn't an object. It is a relation. There is sight, which is a faculty...
July 07, 2021 at 05:13
Ratiocination. Omnipotence - it means being able to do anything at all. Only someone who had control over the laws of Reason would be able to do anyth...
July 07, 2021 at 04:54
Ratiocination. It follows from being omnipotent. To be omnipotent requires being the source of all normative reasons. Epistemic reasons - which is wha...
July 07, 2021 at 04:29
Those aren't arguments! Some of them might feature as premises in arguments against God, but they're not themselves arguments. Most of them are just s...
July 07, 2021 at 01:19
You know there's a temporal element to IQ tests? Oh dear oh dear. Well, I suppose armies need people to fling at enemies. The answer, Kiddo, is 'no'. ...
July 07, 2021 at 00:30
it's a basic IQ test. Just answer the question. If knowledge has two components - true belief and justification - then does possessing all knowledge e...
July 06, 2021 at 23:50
Really? So you understand, then, that a true belief by itself does not constitute an item of knowledge? You understand that, do you? So, can I presume...
July 06, 2021 at 23:23
Now DearGod, what did I just tell you? I told you to stop using the word 'ontological' didn't I? Naughty.
July 06, 2021 at 23:17
Shall I try and explain using an example you may be more familiar with because you bake them for a living? Pizzas. A pizza has at least two components...
July 06, 2021 at 23:10
You didn't read it. You looked at the words and then decided it was about free will and said something about that. And now you're saying more things t...
July 06, 2021 at 22:52
Even that doesn't make sense. I gave you some tasks. And you reply 'dude, good luck with that'. How do you survive?
July 06, 2021 at 22:41
Can you read? Free will isn't mentioned. Your tasks, should you be willing to accept them: 1. Learn to read English 2. Read the OP. 3. Understand what...
July 06, 2021 at 22:22
You aren't engaging with anything I argued.
July 06, 2021 at 21:35
I argued carefully in the OP that being all-knowing is entirely compatible with having some false beliefs. Rather than address anything I argued you h...
July 06, 2021 at 21:33
This thread is not about whether God exists. I have provided a demonstration of God elsewhere. This thread is about whether God can make mistakes. You...
July 06, 2021 at 17:42
Then you are even more confused than I thought. How on earth is this not philosophy? You don't seem to understand the difference between a true belief...
July 06, 2021 at 17:30
And what do you think I am? Shall we recap? Moral norms are directives. I have asked you who is issuing the directives constitutive of moral directive...
July 06, 2021 at 17:04
I repeat, I addressed your point in the OP!! Read. It. He does not have to know that they're false beliefs. They're just false beliefs. He thinks they...
July 06, 2021 at 17:02
I'll tell you what it is with you people - you don't read the OP. I might as well have said 'God can make mistakes because moo moo moo moo" I explicit...
July 06, 2021 at 14:07
look, this isn't working out. It's not me, it's you.
July 06, 2021 at 13:57
Absolutely absurd. It is a meaningful statement and it contains no contradictions. If I own all of the Rembrandt paintings in the world, does that mea...
July 06, 2021 at 13:36
It is no more contradictory than "Bartricks owns every Rembrandt painting in the world, but he does not own some paintings and he has some fake Rembra...
July 06, 2021 at 13:06
It's what omniscient means. It means possessing all knowledge. Maximally knowing. Come up with your own term for it if you like. But it is what I am t...
July 06, 2021 at 12:53
What did I define incorrectly? Omniscient? That means all knowing, yes? What does that mean? That means possessing all knowledge, yes? And knowledge i...
July 06, 2021 at 11:49
it is them. They don't. And there isn't a problem. I am arguing that God can make mistakes, not trying to solve a problem. That's quite profound. Most...
July 06, 2021 at 11:43
No, Corvus. What you're dealing with is some heavy-duty reasoning that's above your intellectual pay grade, that's all. God is an omnipotent, omniscie...
July 06, 2021 at 11:05
Why wouldn't I? Why do you think not? Knowledge is more of an object? What? I told you what knowledge involves: it involves true belief and justificat...
July 06, 2021 at 11:03
Yes. Now, focus on the OP. What's wrong with you people?! Focus!
July 06, 2021 at 11:01
I literally - literally - argued carefully that this is not so. Did you read the OP at all? I feel like I am presenting arguments at an old people's h...
July 06, 2021 at 11:00
Relevance?
July 06, 2021 at 10:59
That's not the argument I made. The argument I made works even if one thinks God is restricted by logic.
July 06, 2021 at 10:58
But it is surely clearly wrong to watch other people 24/7 and to peer into their minds and read their inner most thoughts? There are lots of ways to d...
July 06, 2021 at 00:45
That simply doesn't follow. If the only basis I have for believing in Napoleon is a book I read about Napoleon, that doesn't mean Napoleon is made of ...
July 06, 2021 at 00:11
What on earth are you on about?? God is omnisient. God is omnibenevolent. God is omnipotent. I'm not denying any of those. Don't you understand what I...
July 05, 2021 at 11:24
Problems for my thesis: if God's will determines what we have reason to believe, and God does not favour himself believing some things about us, then ...
July 05, 2021 at 08:20
I'm afraid I do not know what you're saying. That's bible stuff, right? I said God is an omnipotent, omniscient, omnibenevolent person. I said don't p...
July 05, 2021 at 07:53
Relevance? Justifications are made of normative reasons. There are different kinds of normative reasons, including epistemic and moral. But all of the...
July 05, 2021 at 06:07
Incidentally, I should add that I am not arguing that God does not know what 'we' get up to - for we are not innocent, so the argument I am making doe...
July 05, 2021 at 05:04
By being blind and stupid. Ask me another.
July 05, 2021 at 01:34