It's what any intelligent person thinks. Lots of things lack sexes. Numbers, locations, and so on. The question 'what sex is the number 3?" is confuse...
That's not a summary of anything I have said. God is not a man or a woman, okay? God could occupy a male or female body, just as we do. But she's not ...
Human beings. A lot of them are sexists. Haven't you noticed? Sexism is also a vice, yes? And God is morally perfect. So, is God going to be a sexist?...
God doesn't have a gender. Genders are what bodies have, not what minds have. And God is a mind. Of course, so too are we. And thus we are all genderl...
Ah, well there you go. I have. And there aren't words to describe it. Velasquez's portrait of pope innocent X is another in the same league. If you se...
Like I say, you're very confused. An omnipotent being can do anything. Thus an omnipotent being has the power to dispose of their omnipotence if they ...
Well, I consider that gibberish apart from the last question. And yes, God can do that. He can do anything. I mean, even I can contradict myself. So i...
No it doesn't. It means he is not doing it. Once more, you are as confused as someone who thinks that as bachelors do not have wives, there is a curio...
Yes, I am sure that's correct about some collectors. There are, I am sure, all manner of financial schemes behind a lot of what goes on in the art mar...
That's a contradiction: if the art market critical consensus is what constitutively determines what is or isn't good or bad art-wise, then Van Gogh's ...
You're not making any sense. An omnipotent being can do anything. Wouldn't be omnipotent otherwise. That means an omnipotent being has the power to ce...
These are not criticisms of anything I've said, but just expressions of scorn. Try engaging with the arguments I have made. Were Van Gogh's paintings ...
That simply doesn't follow. Having the power to do something does not entail that one does it. Otherwise there would be a contradiction involved in su...
Nothing prevents him. He just doesn't. Nothing is preventing me from hurling the boiling hot cup of coffee into my own face. But I am not hurling it i...
I don't know what you mean. Beauty does not lie in any old beholder - not in you or me. Beauty lies in one beholder: God. The feelings by means of whi...
No, I mean he can do it. I think you don't understand omnipotence. Being omnipotent means being able to do anything. So, he can create a stone that is...
I know it - if it is true, that is - by means of ratiocination. And it means that beauty is subjective - that is, that it is made of certain feelings ...
Yes, it would be. If he did it, then there'd be something he couldn't do - and so he'd have given up his omnipotence. Which is something he can do. (I...
Beauty is not in the eye of the beholder. Some people perceive to be beautiful things that are not, and some fail to perceive the beauty of things tha...
I do not follow your reasoning. God is all powerful, by definition. So God can do anything. He is not constrained in any way. Thus he does have free w...
'Western philosophy' which can be shortened to just 'philosophy' is the practice of using reason to find out what's true. (Anyone can do it, as it is ...
Consequentialism about morality is silly. Invariably what consequentialists do is go from this intuitively plausible premise: 'this action is right be...
No, it is an expression of my view, which is then followed by a rational defence. That is, I explain why I think my view is correct: I think it is cor...
In the OP. I am a philosopher and I wrote the OP. This isn't a medical issue. It's a philosophical one. Not that many are capable of drawing this dist...
Yes. A group of cells isn't a person. And yes, this is called clear thinking. It is bound to seem a little strange to you. Once more, try and address ...
What are you on about? I am talking about what is just in a community - communities of persons. A violinist, some music lovers, and someone with kidne...
Comments