3017amen

Yep, point well taken! Most think there was a continuum of expansion. Others are not so sure: https://www.livescience.com/65254-what-happened-before-b...

Well, I suppose one thought, of many, would be the so-called significance, or the philosophy behind the creation of that reality show 'Naked and Afrai...

There are a lot of concerns I have with your thinking. Other than your point about having a lack of understanding (finitude) which of course I agree w...

Hello Jack. I would strongly suggest you start a new thread concerning your sojourn. (There may be others here who can better identify with your conce...

Are you thinking that say, if metaphysical abstracts like mathematical truth's, are necessary to describe the rational laws of the universe, then a ne...

Sure. We can discuss a priori concepts of God. Firstly, would you like to make an argument relative to the effectiveness of mathematical truths viz th...

Possibility! I'll come back to your other points but I feel compelled to underscore your foregoing quote. It was not my intention to dismiss our so-ca...

Yes because his obituary was noted in the media.

No. Logically impossible to explain.

Consciousness exists but it's logically impossible to explain. In the context of an attribute that transcends formal logic, Jesus also had attributes ...

I'm not with you on that one. Consider the liar's paradox. The only way out (or at least one way out) is paraconsistent logic making it both true and ...

Of course I disagree. Consider the necessity of clothing. That 'facade' is as necessary as your example of 'dressing for success' because people consi...

Philosophim! Consider that logic cannot explain the true nature of consciousness (we cannot create or design consciousness from nothing/something; we ...

I'm not sure your fellow atheist's would approve of your behavior :chin:

Gotcha indeed you're on a fishing expedition! LOL

Unfortunately, I'm still not following your logic . First you evaded the questions with questions so that tells us something right there. Second it so...

Gosh please don't take this the wrong way but it sounds like you're talking about yourself. No matter, let's go ahead and put your money where your mo...

Not following that. I thought I already answered your question, no?

Yep correct

But you're using deductive logic to determine your 'lack of evidence' belief system. And if I'm correct, you are no better or worse than the theist. S...

Benj! Keep in mind that if the prevailing Big Bang theory is correct, then it follows that something outside of time created temporal time itself. And...

You attacked deductive reasoning from the OP, yet it appears to be the same reasoning you use for your belief in no God.

No, I'm claiming that you use deduction for your belief in no God.

Well that archaic tradition is the same tradition that you seem to use, in this case: deductive logic. Furthermore, just because you had some bad expe...

Yo dude, have you thought about an anger management course? Or maybe it's that whole New Jersey Guido thing relative to your ego that philosophim talk...

Yep. Nothing new under the sun there!! Unfortunately yet another angry atheist on the warpath... . I still can't figure out why they're so angry about...

Blame yourself for relying on deductive reasoning for your belief in no God. :chin:

Sure thing. I would recommend a short cut, and go straight to how synthetic a priori knowledge is possible. From there you will find a treasure trove ...

I suppose one could say that the concepts presented in your argument is another version of the infamous Ontological argument(s). The funny thing is (a...

Welcome Jack! After reading your posts, please feel free to share how important your physical makeup ( and other's) is to the phenomenon of Love, Eros...

1. Possibility believes that the physical aspect of interaction is not necessary for Love. True, false, or something else? 2. Possibility believes Lov...

Nice!

Really, are you sure? Well, the history of Poetry itself is quite intriguing, as you may know. It dates all the way back to Africa and what they call ...

Philosophim! Thank you kindly as I indeed have mutual respect. There are a lot of angry atheists on this site so I take it with a grain of salt and ju...

1. He was driving and not driving. True or false or contradiction?

By George, I think you're onto something! He seems to be quite mysterious :smile:

Oh gotcha. Okay. 1. He was driving and not driving. True or false?

Go back on the particular thread and do your homework. Otherwise don't troll this one.

You mean like the questions you evaded in the Kant thread? Sounds like another angry atheist pivoting LOL

You mean like the liar's unresolved paradox? Or would you rather parse the nature of causational suicide?

Mmmm interesting. Would those tendencies come from your conscious, subconscious or Freudian unconscious mind?

A dipolar God is most certainly logically possible. Have you read the book The Mind of God by physicist Paul Davies?

Okay!?

Are you sure? How could I willfully commit suicide while I was driving and daydreaming?

Nice!

Don't you just hate it when you intentionally crash and kill yourself!?

Really? I'd call it illogical.

But how is driving and not driving possible?

Driving is the controlled operation and movement of a motor vehicle, including cars, motorcycles, trucks, and buses. In that case, it was controlled, ...

“The temptation to belittle others is the trap of a budding intellect, because it gives you the illusion of power and superiority your mind craves. Re...