You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

Abstraction.
September 12, 2025 at 23:58
... corresponds, imho, to the difference between training (therapy) and understanding (surgery). :up: :up: .
September 12, 2025 at 23:46
:up: :up: :fire: :smirk:
September 12, 2025 at 04:26
Spinoza says Deus, sive natura, not 'natura deus ist'. (Contra popular misreadings: acosmism.) To wit: (Emphasis is mine.)
September 12, 2025 at 01:43
Afaik, as per Plato ..., know thyself =/= "self-help".
September 12, 2025 at 01:03
:fire:
September 11, 2025 at 18:49
Yes, fear of death. Re: curiosity about unexplained changes.
September 11, 2025 at 18:15
My guess: in crudely computational terms, 'mind' seems (mostly) throughput and 'consciousness' seems (mostly) output.
September 11, 2025 at 17:57
MAGA's "Reichstag fire" moment?! https://www.fox13now.com/news/local-news/northern-utah/political-activist-believed-shot-at-utah-valley-university-spe...
September 11, 2025 at 03:45
Minding is a metacognitive activity (i.e. strange looping process), and not an entity; it is what an ecology-situated, sufficiently complex brain can ...
September 11, 2025 at 03:19
:roll: Typical apologist's strawman.
September 11, 2025 at 02:59
Yes, I think so. My take, in sum: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/857773 This only a subjective statement ... Genetic fallacy. ... j...
September 10, 2025 at 20:38
Your guess is as good as mine. Some old posts ...
September 09, 2025 at 22:29
E.g. chattal slavery, the industrial revolution, mechanized "total" war, the administrative state, mass media, bourgeois nihilism, etc have, I think, ...
September 09, 2025 at 18:17
:up:
September 09, 2025 at 02:25
If I did not exist, then this reply to your OP would not exist ... as the universe would have been (become) a different universe. Change any part of t...
September 09, 2025 at 01:31
It seems to me that varieties of (non-solipsistic) idealism speculate on the significance of "subjectivity".
September 08, 2025 at 21:55
:up: :up:
September 08, 2025 at 17:05
:up: :up:
September 07, 2025 at 23:38
No. No.
September 07, 2025 at 02:37
:cool: I'm a disutilitarian (i.e. negative consequentialist) too. The moral facts of (1) useless suffering and (2) fear of suffering are both (A) expe...
September 06, 2025 at 03:23
:up: :up:
September 05, 2025 at 05:07
:up: :up:
September 04, 2025 at 17:25
I've argued that my usage is objectively true. e.g. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/540198
September 04, 2025 at 05:18
:lol:
September 03, 2025 at 20:01
My guess is that he would have concluded, as Einstein & Penrose have, that QM is an incomplete physical theory (à la "Schrödinger's Cat") because it i...
September 03, 2025 at 19:21
:up: :up: Without grounds to do so, such challenges, or questioning, is, at best, idle. You've not provided any compelling grounds which throw how eit...
September 03, 2025 at 18:58
Non-existence, however, includes "good" ... I don't see any reason to accept this "definition". "Should exist" implies a contradiction from the negati...
September 03, 2025 at 16:53
:up: :up: :rofl: :smirk: :up:
September 03, 2025 at 01:36
Here's my take on pre-linguistic / pre-cognitive "moral sensibility" from a 2022 thread Do animals have morality? https://thephilosophyforum.com/discu...
September 03, 2025 at 01:25
"At a societal level", in terms of governing (i.e. maintaining order and security of equitable, public goods), I think the public concern is not moral...
September 02, 2025 at 23:16
:up: :up:
September 02, 2025 at 20:45
Here are a couple of articles on vat-grown meat that can reduce animal suffering today: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/dec/08/worlds-lar...
September 02, 2025 at 20:22
:up: :up:
September 02, 2025 at 04:12
:monkey:
September 02, 2025 at 04:07
:fire:
September 01, 2025 at 21:49
Yes, but that "truth" does not entail that "non-veganism" is immoral or necessarily so. Imo, eating either non-industrial or vat-grown/3-d printed mea...
September 01, 2025 at 20:38
Assertion without argument or evidence – an opinion.
September 01, 2025 at 08:46
@"Truth Seeker" Here's a relevant post from 2022 ... https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/702431
September 01, 2025 at 07:42
:up:
September 01, 2025 at 07:19
Imho, "opinions" are usually not "right or wrong" and, in most circumstances, more useless than useful. Btw, sophists concern themselves with "opinion...
August 31, 2025 at 23:51
:up: :up:
August 31, 2025 at 19:00
"Personal pain and suffering" define you? E.g. friendship (vide Epicurus), solidarity (vide Camus) ... Well, unless you're an Advaita Vedantist, you a...
August 31, 2025 at 18:00
In other words, "the God of the pews" doesn't hold up under logical or metaphysical scrutiny and therefore is ontologically eliminable; the speculativ...
August 31, 2025 at 17:41
According to Epicurus, while death is final, "the gods or God" represent moral ideals to aspire to and live by (re: aponia, ataraxia ... "bliss").
August 31, 2025 at 17:24
:up: :up:
August 31, 2025 at 02:30
:up: :up: :up: :smirk:
August 31, 2025 at 02:26
:100: Suppose each thing is always a 'superposition of possibilities' but that measuring a thing tracks, or records, only one possibility at a time wh...
August 30, 2025 at 23:42
Afaik, the vast majority of religious believers are not "classical" theists in practice and instead worship a personal God (or gods). As Pascal says R...
August 30, 2025 at 23:39
It's consistent with historical usages of Hindus (e.g. Vedanta), philosophers (e.g. the absolute, the infinite), Scholastics & Thomists (e.g. necessar...
August 30, 2025 at 21:10