Yes (see below). Legality (institutional) =/= morality (interpersonal). Probably for the same reason carnivorism isn't "legal mandatory in all countri...
David Bohm's conjecture is, I think, much closer to Spinoza's 'substance & modes' than to Plato's 'forms & appearances' because "the explicate order" ...
Again, I say: Explain why "nature" requires a "source" (that is, why isn't the "source" itself also "nature"?) Why assume "something" is not uncaused?...
I agree with Feuerbach: projections. More plausibly than not, a "transcendent realm" is an example of a "mere projection". :sparkle: If "nature" has a...
These conceptions are independent; neither are necessary properties of or entailed by atheism. To my mind "shallow atheism" denotes a lack of belief i...
"Ethical contradictions" have yet to "arise" in (my) everyday life. However, when faced with a dilemma / tradeoff, I try to discern (mostly by habit) ...
How do you/we know NDE-subjects "experience" anything while there is zero brain activity? Btw, "materialism" is not a theoretical explanation but an o...
:smirk: :up: I.e. dogmatism (or superstition). :clap: :lol: Welcome to the Matrix! Funny thing about "liberal education" is those few with the most of...
:roll: Yeah, and if "reincarnations", "alien abductions" or "astral projections" are veridical, then ... :sparkle: Addendum to https://thephilosophyfo...
The 'god of deism' is transcendent – ontologically separate – from the universe in contrast to Spinoza's immanent substance that is not ontologically ...
Afaik, the "God" of Western "classical theism" (JCI & pagan) is a belated, unparsimonious, and in some ways conceptually incoherent form of – derivati...
If so, what's the "explanation" for this "mind at large"? or evidence for each "mind being a filter"? or is Bergson's idea only a speculative analogy ...
You asked what would convince me and I've told you. In contrast to the above: laboratory-solid, hypothetico-deductively (i.e. experimentally)-solid. O...
Some (non-abstract) "objects" are also "conscious beings" and the vast majority are not. Neither type is "more real" than the other as far as I can te...
IIRC, neither thinker argues for "reincarnation and resurrection" symbolically or otherwise. And "consciousness" is not "fundamental" in either philos...
Well, as I've said elsewhere, I read Spinoza's conception of dual-property parallelism as a logical implication of 'non-transcendent (or monist), eter...
As I wrote in my previous post: at least objective corroboration – not just ad hoc circumstantial coincidences – testable-controlled, experimental evi...
Thank you. Yeah ... I couldn't write this story today after two years of atrocities which the world has collectively stood by and watched impotently. ...
Comments