You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

December 20, 2023 at 00:30
So what? Most criminals 'believe' they are not guilty of their crimes. Moral reasoning and judgment is preventative, or proactive, not an in media res...
December 19, 2023 at 18:30
Without warrant you ascribe the property of being "finite" to "person" which is not intrinsic to the concept. Also, circles (or spheres) are both infi...
December 19, 2023 at 18:11
Yes, metaphysiically, not logically.
December 19, 2023 at 17:41
Can you distinguish between politics (or jurisprudence) and ethics, Joshs? Hillel's principle, as I call it, concerns moral encounters with others (M....
December 19, 2023 at 17:39
"Infinite person" is one person that is infinite in extent, not "more than one" person. The concept is no more contradiction in logic than "pegasus" o...
December 19, 2023 at 17:27
I can't follow you. Literalism is the death of reasoning and judgment. It is hateful to me to be amputated unless it is medically necessary to prevent...
December 19, 2023 at 17:10
Elaborate on what?
December 19, 2023 at 16:42
The above misses the point. You are talking about 'public policy"' and Hillel is talking about moral conduct. No "loopholes" when comparing apples and...
December 19, 2023 at 16:29
I still don't know why I bother. I've been scribbling incessantly since preschool. Why do it? Like for most who write, putting down 500 words of prose...
December 19, 2023 at 09:49
:fire:
December 19, 2023 at 09:07
Welcome to the forum! :up: IMO, no one yet, secular or religious, has improved on ... i.e. harmful¹
December 19, 2023 at 08:56
:up: :up: IMO, that's instrumental reasoning (re: things, i.e. means-to-ends) and not moral reasoning (re: persons, i.e. ends-in-themselves) which I'd...
December 19, 2023 at 08:19
A metaphysical impossibility such as 'an infinite person' is logically possible, no?
December 19, 2023 at 08:14
"Conservatism?" To conserve the status quo (ante). The oppressor always desires peace in the form of a completely pacified, oppressed population – per...
December 17, 2023 at 16:27
"Shalom!" :mask: :up:
December 17, 2023 at 15:09
:lol: Wtf are you talking about, tim?! Your (Dunning-Kruger level) historical illiteracy and/or self-deception are stunning.
December 17, 2023 at 14:31
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
December 15, 2023 at 23:12
Plenty of "controlling" females have crossed my path but not enough commanding women (or men for that matter). :fire:
December 15, 2023 at 22:55
Brilliantly succinct – Wille zur Macht – oh yeah! You 'mansplain' that much much better than I ever could, lady! :clap: :cool::flower:
December 15, 2023 at 19:29
This. Chance. The universe. "Life" (i.e. local order) is just entropy's rarified way of increasing entropy (i.e. global disorder). Compared to what? A...
December 15, 2023 at 18:06
So what's your point? Israel (& its settler-colonialist apatheid policy) has been a US-client state for over a half-century.
December 15, 2023 at 17:07
You shouldn't be. :sweat:
December 14, 2023 at 23:00
@"BitconnectCarlos" @"RogueAI" @"tim wood" @"schopenhauer1" Can you handle some more truth? https://youtu.be/qMRIqznX9IM?si=WHH2oXU83Obx6sDc "This is ...
December 14, 2023 at 22:58
You are my example. :zip: Of course, science cannot address non-scientific topics (and vice versa).
December 14, 2023 at 22:40
Thanks for proving my point that you have no idea what you are talking about, Pantagruel. :clap:
December 14, 2023 at 16:32
:sweat: Gotcha, it's so basic or fundamental to science that you can't provide a single example.
December 14, 2023 at 13:47
That's not my understanding of scientific practice. Science certainly does not "study itself". Again, you got examples? There must be countless many i...
December 14, 2023 at 05:47
I don't think so. :up: Please clarify. Examples would be helpful.
December 13, 2023 at 23:45
Thank you for pointing this out. @"FrancisRay" is like too many others who traffic in "doctrines" and dogmas and take offense when someone attempts to...
December 13, 2023 at 18:35
:up: :up:
December 12, 2023 at 17:00
Proscrastination feels like being killed slowly.
December 12, 2023 at 01:26
This is what thinkers, particularly philosophers, do, Francis: we disturb the peace (i.e. smug givens, unexamined assumptions, etc). You're right, tho...
December 11, 2023 at 11:52
:up: Well said. Reminds me mostly of the ataraxia teachings of Epicureans and Stoics (which, no doubt, influenced Montaigne, Spinoza, et al). :up: :up...
December 10, 2023 at 19:06
:rofl: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/855739
December 10, 2023 at 18:42
:roll: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/859880
December 10, 2023 at 14:03
You say "Perennial Philosophy" explains but you do not give (or summarize) the explanation. You also say it "predicts"; but in the absence of any inte...
December 09, 2023 at 13:02
Only semantically. :roll: Rather, we only have to show by the preponderance of the evidence that the universe observed is just as predicted by theory ...
December 09, 2023 at 02:13
https://youtu.be/PwvF23bvgTM?si=YlbySfcmDXwgLIJe "Cars Hiss By My Window" (4:10) LA Woman, 1971 The Doors b. 8Dec43 https://youtu.be/nIR6AAjEg5U?si=3M...
December 08, 2023 at 13:12
i. What 'facts of the matter' do "the nondual doctrine of the Perennial Philosophy" explain? ii. What 'predictions' can be derived from this "Perennia...
December 08, 2023 at 11:39
Use someone else's story from a past TPF "story contest" as a prompt – take it's premise, protagonist / antagonist or setting and run with it to explo...
December 05, 2023 at 22:21
Denny Laine d. 2023 https://youtu.be/Plhtk_XJqhM?si=Kzp8W_qa1Rqxeg00 "Mull of Kintyre" (4:45) A-side single, 1977 writers Paul McCartney & Denny Laine...
December 05, 2023 at 20:24
Confusion =/= perplexity. 'Clarity of the latter' (inquiry) is not the same as 'more of the former' (word salad). :roll: Anyway, I recommend reading P...
December 05, 2023 at 18:24
On the contrary, Jack, I make a distinction between philosophical questions and non-philosophical observations such as you've made. I find your OP con...
December 05, 2023 at 17:12
:up: You've made some 'empirical observations' but still have not yet raised a philosophical question as far as I can tell. Yes, this is what a modern...
December 05, 2023 at 16:22
Please be more precise: what is (your) philosophical question – perplexity – about "emotions"?
December 05, 2023 at 05:22
No "cool kids" here, just thinkers and blinkers.
December 04, 2023 at 04:25