You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

"The past is never dead. It's not even past." ~William Faulkner, Requiem for a Nun https://youtu.be/6MNf4fNfVTI?si=EqekDJrlOUVUxLly “I was talking abo...
February 06, 2024 at 10:09
De profundis ad astra ... https://www.theguardian.com/science/2024/feb/05/astronomy-telescope-chile-vera-c-rubin-observatory :clap: :nerd:
February 05, 2024 at 15:53
I hear some of us are rarer birds than that: thinkers.
February 05, 2024 at 11:25
:fire: BDS (Benedictus de Spinoza ... would approve.)
February 05, 2024 at 08:17
February 05, 2024 at 03:04
Nagel's anecdotal, fact-free, special pleading is embarrassing and I'm not at all surprised that you're a sucker for it, Wayf, since it agrees with yo...
February 05, 2024 at 01:32
Nice try, but ...
February 04, 2024 at 12:51
From a reply to you, Wayfarer, on your thread "The Mind-Created World" ... https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/842295 Furthermore ... An...
February 04, 2024 at 10:41
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/877821
February 04, 2024 at 06:28
Answer my question, Wayfarer, and then I'll answer yours. The topic raisrd by OP is "the nature of esoteric forms of philosophy" and not "secular cult...
February 04, 2024 at 06:24
:up:
February 03, 2024 at 23:47
Metaphysics without logic too. Same just-so story.
February 03, 2024 at 23:34
Well, since very few philosophers or scientists dogmatically advocate "metaphysical physicalism", you're taking issue wirh a non-issue (or strawman), ...
February 03, 2024 at 23:27
:clap: :fire: Excellent, well put! Thinking is questioning – being-oneself-in-question – and not merely believing in answers ("esoteric" or otherwise)...
February 03, 2024 at 23:06
:chin: Give an example of how "idealism" is "equally compatible" (as e.g. physicalism is) with the established facts of "evolution" or "cosmology". Th...
February 03, 2024 at 22:51
:up:
February 03, 2024 at 22:21
:smirk:
February 03, 2024 at 21:46
Define "nothing" (including how that concept differs from 'nothing-ness'). As an undefined term, your argument seems invalid. "Time" is only a metric;...
February 03, 2024 at 21:44
:smirk: :up: :100:
February 02, 2024 at 20:46
This "insight" is partial because existents are only part(icular)s of – ineluctably encompassed by – existence and is, therefore, only "a glance" of a...
February 02, 2024 at 09:51
Bibi's policy of supporting Hamas since 2004 has been expressly to sabotage any "Two State Solution" by keeping the Palestinian population divided bet...
February 02, 2024 at 02:33
I'm unaware of any "real reason to live" other than that which one gives oneself by taking caring of – investing time in –anything or anyone other tha...
February 02, 2024 at 02:01
... and they may not. Which is it? What are you talking about, Jack? :roll:
February 01, 2024 at 20:58
:100: :up: Metaphor, however, is not synonymous with esoterica. https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/877179
February 01, 2024 at 20:53
"Beware lest a statue slay you." ~Freddy Zarathustra
February 01, 2024 at 20:48
I'm not a Jungian / Campbellian or transperonalist, etc so clarify for me in layman's terms, Jack: Why is "living out mythic aspects of dramas" "extre...
February 01, 2024 at 20:41
So then you don't have any "tangible examples" of the difference the distinction between "exoteric and esoteric" makes particularly in philosophy? Tel...
February 01, 2024 at 20:34
:fire: :up: Mythos as light that casts shadows of Logos on the cave wall ... ... in other words, "esoteric forms" in contrast to reflective (and defea...
February 01, 2024 at 20:25
What?
February 01, 2024 at 19:53
Addendum to https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/874592 If the Netanyahu regime walks like 'genocide / ethnic cleansing propagandized as ...
February 01, 2024 at 19:51
addendum to: In case you haven't been paying attention: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/877051
February 01, 2024 at 08:39
In case you haven't been paying attention: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/877051
February 01, 2024 at 08:38
A first draft of history: "January 6th" Democracy on Trial Frontline documentary https://youtu.be/Y44fyh4ap7k?si=PxvsRYa9jN3Z-ySc aired 30Jan24
February 01, 2024 at 08:36
So one can have, or acquire, reasons to choose or not to choose to be a philosophical pessimist (i.e. rationally committed to the idea that it is rati...
February 01, 2024 at 02:56
:up: :up: Many folks are just intellectually lazy. :roll:
February 01, 2024 at 02:09
Each reader has to answer that for herself after studying Spinoza (or any other metaphysician) for herself. My spoon-feeding apparently isn't helping ...
February 01, 2024 at 01:06
Spinoza's substance (i.e. nature or god) is a metaphysical supposition , not an empirical theory.
January 31, 2024 at 17:02
We shall see soon enough. :up:
January 31, 2024 at 16:25
For Spinoza, speculatively substance is the logico-mathematical structure of the universe (as distinct from the empirical contents in the universe) ak...
January 31, 2024 at 16:21
:cool:
January 31, 2024 at 05:57
:smirk: :up:
January 31, 2024 at 04:42
:up: :up: Yeah, reasoning be damned. Unfortunately, even tragicomically, your insight is quite true. Happy warrior! :strong:
January 31, 2024 at 04:27