You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

@"Mark S" :smirk: :up:
March 14, 2024 at 04:04
:100: Yes, scientism (or pseudo-science) is, at best, bad philosophy (i.e. sophistry). :up:
March 13, 2024 at 22:11
Given the factcity of disvalues (i.e. whatever is bad for – harmful to – natural beings)^^, it is a performative contradiction not to reduce disvalues...
March 13, 2024 at 12:58
You're mistaken again. I've not asked for "proof" of anything including for you to "prove a negative". Apparently, Amadeus, you don't have an answer f...
March 13, 2024 at 05:31
IME, for most members of amy congregation are engaged in groupthink and conform to sectarian traditions reinforced repeated ad nauseam sermons of thei...
March 13, 2024 at 00:12
It's no "problem" for theists: "the good = God" and f*ck the Euthyphro! After all, the habit of believing long precedes – even trumps – thinking. The ...
March 12, 2024 at 22:01
wtf :clap: :rofl: "In the beginning there was no beginning" (i.e. there is no north of the North Pole just as there is no edge of a sphere or first po...
March 12, 2024 at 21:40
"I do not know how to teach philosophy without becoming a disturber of established religion." ~Spinoza :100: The religious (dogmatic) mindset's catego...
March 12, 2024 at 21:22
"Arbitrary?" In ethics, "moral" means something else? My parenthetical stipulation, which you've underlined, expresses empathy (absent some pathologic...
March 12, 2024 at 20:47
Do tell – "not compelling ... various reasons"? (I can use all the help I can get. :smirk:)
March 12, 2024 at 06:59
Yes. Here's a recent post from another thread that might make clearer and more precise what I mean by moral naturalism ... https://thephilosophyforum....
March 12, 2024 at 04:50
I'm not a "dentist" either and you're completely mistaken about moral naturalism as I've used the term in this thread. "Morality" is certainly not "in...
March 12, 2024 at 01:55
Empirical research, rather than philosophical reflection, is much more informative here – consider: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_study
March 12, 2024 at 01:46
What "it" are you referring to?
March 12, 2024 at 01:40
You're mistaken. I have not claimed or implied "morality is innate to the universe".
March 12, 2024 at 01:04
My brother and I were raised in the same observant Catholic family and educated for a dozen years in the same Catholic schools but he remains a life-l...
March 12, 2024 at 01:01
"Neither is Morality" what? No. Why do you ask? No. The sciences I'd mentioned in my previous post, more or less, do just that.
March 12, 2024 at 00:44
:smirk: :up:
March 12, 2024 at 00:05
:up: If so, then tell me what you think of this argument ... https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/336888
March 11, 2024 at 23:47
My understanding is that non-pathological "dreams", like base emotions such as desires & fears, are offline (subconscious-involuntary) cognitions whic...
March 11, 2024 at 23:46
And to a Spinozist ...
March 11, 2024 at 22:55
Yes, and that's nonsense which is why "ghosts and spirts" are merely (affective) ideas but not (non-mental) entities.
March 11, 2024 at 22:50
You might be interested in this 2020 thread Disambiguating the concept of gender https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/336888
March 11, 2024 at 22:42
That's trite.
March 11, 2024 at 21:57
In sum, "faith" is trust in magical thinking (that too many adults never outgrow re: ) in stark contrast to fallibilistic "belief" based on trust in d...
March 11, 2024 at 20:51
Yeah and likewise, e.g. poems "are not identical (or reducible) to" grammars, so what's your philosophical point?
March 11, 2024 at 20:44
@"Manuel" :up: Re: "spirit" (that which breathes, or breaths / voices / winds) & "ghost" (i.e. traum or geist ... dream or in/of the mind ... daimon, ...
March 11, 2024 at 20:08
I think of them as personal (or ancestral) memories and traumatic (or social) histories, respectively. IMO, such beliefs (i.e. literal projections) ar...
March 11, 2024 at 03:54
:up: :up: From what I can tell, sir, that so-called "relationship" is pretty weak. While interdisciplinary disciplines like moral psychology, evolutio...
March 11, 2024 at 03:30
"Empathy" and other emotions are not "cooperation strategies innate to the universe" anymore than (e.g.) strawberries are caused by strawberry-flavore...
March 11, 2024 at 01:49
i.e. superstition (or m?y?)
March 10, 2024 at 11:18
Neither (A) whether or not there is "free will" nor (B) whether or not one believes one has "free will" changes the fact that actions (causes) necessa...
March 10, 2024 at 04:35
This claim seems to me quite an unwarranted (reductive) leap that, so to speak, puts the cart (cultural norms) before the horse (human facticity). Exp...
March 09, 2024 at 21:14
Seems masturbatory. What are you trying to accomplish? I won't bother playing with a LLM until, without prompts, it asks (us) interesting questions.
March 09, 2024 at 08:11
:death: :flower: I've neither claimed or implied otherwise. Obviously, as an existential fact, suffering is not avoidable; morally, however, suffering...
March 08, 2024 at 23:49
Same here, despite a decade or so of Catholic Catechism, altar boy service & bible study, I couldn't shake the (naive?) question: why believe in this ...
March 08, 2024 at 22:30
The question for me, however, is whether or not 'claims about g/G (e.g. theism, deism) are demonstrably true'. AFAIK, such claims are not demonstrably...
March 08, 2024 at 21:56
I've no idea what you're talking about or taking issue with.
March 08, 2024 at 21:22
:up: :up:
March 08, 2024 at 19:42
I wonder if you can think of something interesting to say without taking either my words or Nietzsche's out of context. https://thephilosophyforum.com...
March 08, 2024 at 19:16
"Have to"? That doesn't follow ... and apparently you don't grok my post.
March 08, 2024 at 11:04
IME, the manifest function of 'US corporate news media' primarily has been to inform the business class & its mandarins (i.e. shareholders) while simu...
March 08, 2024 at 04:48
If you say so. Yeah, that's what the astrologer (or witch doctor) said to the astrophysicist (or medical doctor).
March 06, 2024 at 21:18
I'm not saying that. Again, I'm saying this: for the reasons given in that post. No apology needed. I don't think so. BBT explains only the developmen...
March 06, 2024 at 08:44
Of course ... https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/mar/05/us-banks-leave-esg-finance-climate-crisis
March 06, 2024 at 07:31
As an American I believe this observation is only true of less than half of the half of the population who bother to vote. :mask:
March 06, 2024 at 02:26