180 Proof

:up:

Scheler's Ethical Personalism, Peter H. Spader

Yes. Aka compositional fallacy. :up:

Well, at least you're 'literate enough' to read a calendar, lil troll.

Happy International Workers' Day. :victory: :flower:

Happy International Workers' Day! :victory: :flower:

UK Royal Astronomer, Sir Martin Rees and I seem to be on the same page (more or less): https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/apr/30/space-bil...

:clap: :100: Well then, at the very least, the correlation between 'laissez-faire' and 'plutocracy' is (almost) +1 and so "how the former leads to the...

Cite an example of laissez-faire nation-state that isn't, in effect, a plutocracy / oligopoly.

:100: :smirk:

:100:

The Sun is made of baryonic matter. Whatever dark matter is made of, it's not made of baryons. Thus, grammar & logic are indispensable. A question for...

I'm saying your question is incoherent. "Rules apply" to maps (e.g. theoretical models) and not to the territory (e.g. "dark matter and physical laws"...

I'm not following you. We make maps of the terrority. We don't make (determine) the territory itself; thus, there are no "set of rules" for making (de...

You dont. One applies rules grammar and logic to one's descriptions / explanations of e.g. "dark matter and physical laws".

No, much earlier. The French Revolution (1789), "left-right" refers to respective seating areas of rival ideologues in the National Assembly. https://...

:up:

:100: :mask: :up:

:fire:

9-to-5 I prefer Epicurean-Spinozist (but afterhours and most weekends I'm a Zapffean Absurdist). :up:

They weren't ever leftist regimes or states. Both were totalitarian nationalist regimes (i.e. militarist (rightist) command economies) :sweat: No, you...

Grammar (semantics). Logic (LNC).

No, they both began as dictatorships. Mao & Lenin, respectively.

My quick & dirty: • rightism advocates exclusive shareholder control of government, business, media and culture (e.g. oligopoly/plutocracy) mostly man...

I wouldn't characterize either the PRC or USSR as ever having been "representative of leftism". Libertarian socialist / Green movements & Human Rights...

:monkey:

Only to the willfully, incorrigibly, ignorant like yourself.

Oh, right, and finance isn't applied math. :roll:

So, for example, financial redlining, which long predates "Ethnic Studies", isn't systemic racial discrimination?

Denied. :rofl: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_mathematics

Genuflect and give praise, little lamb. :pray:

You can't be that stupid. Go troll somewhere else.

Only the "undefined, vague" ... Define "gods" in such a way that distinguishes them by their predicates as existing from not existing, then apply such...

Even if that's true, your claim suggests a genetic fallacy ... Big whup, Your Wokeness.

How a tool is used can be "racist" (or some other exploitative/discriminatory "x–ist") like for instance financial redlining, not the mere tool itself...

Credo quia absurdum. :smirk: :100: :fire:

Well, "God" is the ur-"incoherent concept" (i.e. empty name), no?

:clap: :up: :lol: I think "the paradox" really comes down to: Can an omnipotent entity limit its own omnipotence? If it can but does not, it remains o...

:chin:

:rofl:

:yikes: :monkey: :lol:

(A)nd those who've spent too little time wandering through old villages and dusty towns in non-secular, under-developed countries / failed-states.

:rofl:

:up:

False dichotomy – 3. Everybody is uncertain (re: the future). 4 Everybody is ignorant (re: the past). Etcetera..

:up: :smirk:

:up: I find a second-order approach – is theism (or its sine qua non claims) true or not true? – more reasonable. • theists believe 'theism is true' (...

:up: 4. Written on page, theism is not true (antitheism)

A non-authoritarian, inclusive commons, participatory order is "anarchy", no?