You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

Consider this ... I gave it a go in this old post and then later on a different thread Yeah, yeah: semantic, concept jugglery (aka 'Hegelian' metaphys...
July 16, 2022 at 07:02
Are we talking about god-based morality or nature-based morality or not nature-based morality?
July 16, 2022 at 05:34
Okay, then I misread you. Yes, nature-based moral systems (e.g. disutilitarianism / epicureanism, (modern) virtue ethics, (modern) stoicism, deep ecol...
July 16, 2022 at 04:59
Deduced from "God"? Not soundly.
July 16, 2022 at 04:33
"God" is a fiction, so such reasoning / deduction is necessarily unsound.
July 16, 2022 at 04:22
:up: Spinoza's "bondage".
July 16, 2022 at 04:16
In: Bannings  — view comment
:up:
July 16, 2022 at 04:08
We're prisoners – "lifers" – of existence (à la gnosticism). No one here gets out alive. :death: :flower:
July 16, 2022 at 04:07
I was alluding to emotions (limbic system) and reason (prefrontal cortex), respectively.
July 16, 2022 at 03:52
:smirk:
July 16, 2022 at 02:10
I agree. Every choice is either 'mostly helpful' or 'mostly harmful' or 'mostly indifferent' to oneself (e.g. Sartre) and/or another (e.g. Levinas). T...
July 16, 2022 at 02:07
:cool:
July 15, 2022 at 18:19
A ratfook'd pub's brew that's 1 part Irving Welsh & 2 parts Michel Houellebecq on the rocks. :yum: Another round, please, for old Sam Beckett and me. ...
July 15, 2022 at 18:06
Addendum to &
July 15, 2022 at 17:21
"Feets is good", they say, "but wheels is gooder." :smirk:
July 15, 2022 at 17:11
:rofl: :yikes: :rofl:
July 15, 2022 at 06:29
:fire: :roll: Like theocracy, ... only religious morality "requires" g/G. :point:
July 15, 2022 at 02:37
(A) I'd replied to the baker, not to you. (B) Confucius is Chinese, not Greek. :roll:
July 15, 2022 at 01:45
I quoted the question. What are you smoking / drinking? https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/718532
July 14, 2022 at 21:24
Read them in their cultural-historical contexts. The moral systems they present are in contrast to the superstitions / religious practices prevailing ...
July 14, 2022 at 18:31
There is "no appeal to authority". No "argument" required. I answered with some classic examples a question raised in the OP. Maybe you and some other...
July 14, 2022 at 17:50
:clap: :lol:
July 14, 2022 at 07:31
In the context of this story contest, I interpret "Not for me" as I like the story least (of rhe options) – one star out of three – rather than "I don...
July 14, 2022 at 07:25
Besides the Nicomachean Ethics, these (more or less contemporaneous) works come to mind as proponents of secular morality: Confucius' Analects, Plato'...
July 14, 2022 at 07:11
"Far more unstructured than any vacua" makes no sense to me.
July 14, 2022 at 04:19
:fire: e.g. Eternal vacua of fluctuating, virtual universes/clocks. (Otherwise, there's "nothing" to prevent not-nothing from coming-to-be, continuing...
July 14, 2022 at 03:36
What's confusing? The options are listed vertically: top - I enjoyed it, middle - It's OK & bottom - Not for me (i.e. first / "liked best", second / l...
July 14, 2022 at 02:53
:smirk: So a non-physical / im-material "cause" of physical / material processes, yes (i.e. woo-of-the gaps)? corollaries: • How does your "Meta-physi...
July 13, 2022 at 18:36
It doesn't. :point: This doesn't makes any sense since quantum uncertainty necessitates the absence of "a First Cause". (E.g. the Hartle-Hawking No Bo...
July 13, 2022 at 12:49
Why Evolution is True, Jerry A. Coyne Dawkins vs Gould, Kim Sterelny
July 13, 2022 at 12:22
Ask @"Cuthbert".
July 12, 2022 at 22:27
Like idealism, psychoanalysis in any form is bullshit. :zip:
July 12, 2022 at 22:25
"American carnage" —> January 6, 2021 :mask:
July 12, 2022 at 19:47
Addendum to https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/714160 https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_Lincoln%27s_Lyceum_address
July 12, 2022 at 17:32
:fire: :up:
July 12, 2022 at 17:18
In: Pantheism  — view comment
I think "pantheism" overstates the case (though not as flagrantly as "pan-en-theism" or "pan-en-deism"). A woo-free speculation much more consistent w...
July 12, 2022 at 16:10
:up:
July 12, 2022 at 07:40
:up: Get some sleep, Jack.
July 12, 2022 at 07:38
Ever since Copernicus's heliocentric model (re: mediocrity principle). :smirk:
July 12, 2022 at 06:02
A 4.6 billion year "time-lag" argument for physicalism: :fire: https://youtu.be/oxObsdE9qQE
July 12, 2022 at 02:23
:starstruck: :party: https://youtu.be/VWjbGHb2ZC4
July 12, 2022 at 01:51
So it's magic, huh? :sparkle: :lol:
July 11, 2022 at 23:21
:ok: :roll:
July 11, 2022 at 22:32
I think "ego" is the drive (i.e. megalomania) to be bigger than everything and everyone else and not "to lose oneself in something greater".
July 11, 2022 at 21:52
I'd say state-Y is after state-X and before state-Z. Yes ("gets" = becomes), the state after the coffee was hot (i.e. the future state of the hot coff...
July 11, 2022 at 21:37
Answer my question first and I'll consider watching your video.
July 11, 2022 at 18:51
So, without further heating, a hot cup of coffee does not become a cold cup of coffee? Okay. I misunderstood. You already had the answer before you as...
July 11, 2022 at 18:46
Yoi may not have intended this but it is an implication in the context of my post about relative states (which are used as "reference points" to one a...
July 11, 2022 at 18:18
Ninja'd. :cool:
July 11, 2022 at 18:10
Nope. Unlike abstract objects "6 & 7", lower entropy is relative to higher entropy. There is no "absolute reference point". Thus, relativity of simult...
July 11, 2022 at 18:07