Consider this ... I gave it a go in this old post and then later on a different thread Yeah, yeah: semantic, concept jugglery (aka 'Hegelian' metaphys...
Okay, then I misread you. Yes, nature-based moral systems (e.g. disutilitarianism / epicureanism, (modern) virtue ethics, (modern) stoicism, deep ecol...
I agree. Every choice is either 'mostly helpful' or 'mostly harmful' or 'mostly indifferent' to oneself (e.g. Sartre) and/or another (e.g. Levinas). T...
A ratfook'd pub's brew that's 1 part Irving Welsh & 2 parts Michel Houellebecq on the rocks. :yum: Another round, please, for old Sam Beckett and me. ...
Read them in their cultural-historical contexts. The moral systems they present are in contrast to the superstitions / religious practices prevailing ...
There is "no appeal to authority". No "argument" required. I answered with some classic examples a question raised in the OP. Maybe you and some other...
In the context of this story contest, I interpret "Not for me" as I like the story least (of rhe options) – one star out of three – rather than "I don...
Besides the Nicomachean Ethics, these (more or less contemporaneous) works come to mind as proponents of secular morality: Confucius' Analects, Plato'...
:fire: e.g. Eternal vacua of fluctuating, virtual universes/clocks. (Otherwise, there's "nothing" to prevent not-nothing from coming-to-be, continuing...
What's confusing? The options are listed vertically: top - I enjoyed it, middle - It's OK & bottom - Not for me (i.e. first / "liked best", second / l...
:smirk: So a non-physical / im-material "cause" of physical / material processes, yes (i.e. woo-of-the gaps)? corollaries: • How does your "Meta-physi...
It doesn't. :point: This doesn't makes any sense since quantum uncertainty necessitates the absence of "a First Cause". (E.g. the Hartle-Hawking No Bo...
I think "pantheism" overstates the case (though not as flagrantly as "pan-en-theism" or "pan-en-deism"). A woo-free speculation much more consistent w...
I'd say state-Y is after state-X and before state-Z. Yes ("gets" = becomes), the state after the coffee was hot (i.e. the future state of the hot coff...
So, without further heating, a hot cup of coffee does not become a cold cup of coffee? Okay. I misunderstood. You already had the answer before you as...
Yoi may not have intended this but it is an implication in the context of my post about relative states (which are used as "reference points" to one a...
Nope. Unlike abstract objects "6 & 7", lower entropy is relative to higher entropy. There is no "absolute reference point". Thus, relativity of simult...
Comments