You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

Why don't you ever answer any of my polite, direct, simple questions of your "unorthodoxy & jargon"? Apparently, you are afraid of exposing your own i...
October 09, 2022 at 02:43
So you cannot differentiate Man from "man-made structures"? :roll: Btw, cite a single case of a "man-made structure" that is separate from nature – un...
October 09, 2022 at 01:57
"If Camus makes sense"? I can't make sense out of your question (above).
October 09, 2022 at 01:44
Well said, sir! :100: :fire:
October 08, 2022 at 21:36
All horizons are "unattainable", and yet – The obstacle, Smith, is the way forward. Amor fati – imagine Sisyphus happy! :death: :flower:
October 08, 2022 at 21:08
No question (philosophical or otherwise), just your (mis)reading of speculative essays by a novelist-dramatist. So why start a new thread?
October 08, 2022 at 20:39
In: Pantheism  — view comment
Pandeism, like natural science and unlike anytheism, is not "faith-based" but is a 'story' that's most consistent (so far) with all of the known physi...
October 08, 2022 at 20:08
:roll: I don't think so. :up:
October 08, 2022 at 19:50
QED. :rofl:
October 08, 2022 at 19:45
:roll: Genetic fallacy. Also, human nature is separate from "nature"?
October 08, 2022 at 05:33
So, a non-epistemic "true or false"? :chin:
October 08, 2022 at 04:29
Problem of the criterion – you're aware of it's significance?
October 08, 2022 at 02:29
Yours, of course; not mine, sir.
October 08, 2022 at 02:27
Gnomon's famously – Dunning-Kruger? dogmatically New Ageist? – incorrigible on this point.
October 08, 2022 at 02:26
As far as I'm concerned, you've not "proved" anything yet, gmba.
October 08, 2022 at 02:18
:smirk:
October 08, 2022 at 01:57
Pedantic fyi – Ludwig Boltzmann & James Clerk Maxwell founded statistical mechanics / thermodynamics in the 19th century.
October 08, 2022 at 01:56
:roll:
October 08, 2022 at 01:44
The statement is not a contradiction, it's conceptually incoherent (i.e. not even false).
October 08, 2022 at 01:41
Instrumentalist? Neo-pragmatist? ...
October 07, 2022 at 23:28
:100:
October 07, 2022 at 22:20
Interesting (I guess 'analytical') approach. :chin: No doubt true of cataphatic "anti-metaphysics".
October 07, 2022 at 22:01
:100: :up: Spooky, ain't it? – when Gnomon, apokrisis & 180 Proof agree (more or less). :smirk:
October 07, 2022 at 21:19
You've misread what I've written.
October 07, 2022 at 20:51
Other than existential survival, to have "higher priorities" other than ethics (i.e. cultivating optimal agency/well-being via conduct and relationshi...
October 07, 2022 at 18:02
... but more like (the study of) constants and functions, respectively.
October 07, 2022 at 07:09
(I guess) "illuminating!" or "insightful!"
October 07, 2022 at 06:39
Process #1.
October 07, 2022 at 04:22
For sociopaths, no doubt.
October 07, 2022 at 04:16
Define, please.
October 07, 2022 at 04:12
:fire: :up:
October 07, 2022 at 03:37
:clap: :smirk: What? :chin:
October 07, 2022 at 03:25
We are "bags of chemistry" and much more due to the complexity of that chemistry. Enlightenment and post-Enlightenment decenterings https://thephiloso...
October 07, 2022 at 03:08
:up:
October 06, 2022 at 20:20
It's a science literacy bias (as well as a science numeracy bias), mi amigo. Without that, TPF would be nothing more than Twitter or Reddit. :mask: :p...
October 06, 2022 at 19:32
Wut :monkey:
October 06, 2022 at 19:27
:ok: Hey, I'm not an idealist/solipsist either so ... :sweat:
October 06, 2022 at 19:18
No, because we cannot "know anything absolutely". What does "know ... absolutely" even mean? We're not absolute beings with the absolute perspective s...
October 06, 2022 at 19:17
:roll: Isn't that still solipsism? As I point out, whether god or my ego, only that "self" is real to itself.
October 06, 2022 at 18:49
Berkeley says "to be is to be perceived" and this seems to presuppose "self-perceived being" that cannot perceive other selves only ("ideas of") bodie...
October 06, 2022 at 17:20
Brains-in-vat / simulation hypothesis.
October 06, 2022 at 01:21
:up:
October 06, 2022 at 01:11
Suffering. Yes. One can be mistaken. Yes. There's no such thing as moral statute of limitation. I think it only means that we are morally fallible.
October 06, 2022 at 01:08
Reread my last post in which I quoted your hypocrisy.
October 05, 2022 at 20:24
:up: Thus, the incoherent triviality of the OP.
October 05, 2022 at 20:21
Freedom is beyond good and evil.
October 05, 2022 at 20:18
:100: :fire: Now look who's talking down ... Projection is a hell of a drug. :roll:
October 05, 2022 at 20:02
:up: To suffer is to cry-out for help to – solicit silently or not for – other sufferers to help stop or reduce the suffering. The moral fact. Like hu...
October 05, 2022 at 19:51
OTD 60 years ago, the Ringo-version of this song was released in the UK ... https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7uQuX1sOYk4 "Love Me Do" (2:22) A-side singl...
October 05, 2022 at 19:05