You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

:up: :up:
January 27, 2023 at 03:11
What's basis for the second conditional?
January 27, 2023 at 02:48
:clap: :fire: Not bad for some who doesn't take philosophy too seriously. If I could, I'd drink two double whiskeys to that, mate! :cool:
January 27, 2023 at 02:43
:sweat:
January 27, 2023 at 02:33
Tyre Nichols 1993?-2023 I can't remember the last time when police officers anywhere in the US were both fired and indicted in less than a month for k...
January 27, 2023 at 02:01
There you go again chatting with a ghost. :smirk:
January 27, 2023 at 01:54
In: Bannings  — view comment
:death: :flower:
January 26, 2023 at 22:36
I've referred many times to 'preventing / reducing NET harm' in my formulations of an ethics. Your strawmanning only leads to non sequiturs, thus your...
January 26, 2023 at 22:28
Well, one of us is playing with the wrong of the mule:
January 26, 2023 at 22:20
Uh huh. :roll: For what it's worth ... https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/554048
January 26, 2023 at 22:08
Can you name a philosopher who was an avid chess player or who recommended chess as prerequisite to doing philosophy?
January 26, 2023 at 22:05
Not knowing whether or not there is a g/G does not entail believing in g/G or disbelieving in g/G. Being agnostic is irrelevant. Observing the foresee...
January 26, 2023 at 21:17
In: Bannings  — view comment
:lol: :up:
January 26, 2023 at 20:46
Bartricks was, in practice, a 'solipsist' and I'm getting 'solipsist' vibes from Zettel.
January 26, 2023 at 20:44
I agree, punos, except I subsritute change for "time". And my answer is consistent, I think, with the Nobel physicist Frank Wilczek's quip e.g. Noethe...
January 26, 2023 at 20:40
:rofl:
January 26, 2023 at 20:19
It's clear from this thread that @"Zettel" disagrees with this because s/he's incorrigibly dogmatic. Another Dunning-Kruger troll; thus, s/he cannot r...
January 26, 2023 at 20:08
In: Emergence  — view comment
What response? Clarify ...
January 26, 2023 at 19:13
I don't think the analogy works, Smith.
January 26, 2023 at 09:25
:cool: Thanks.
January 26, 2023 at 08:25
Due to their intrinsically meta-discursive uses, philosophical (i.e. reflective) statements are suppositional, not propositional (i.e. truth-apt). If ...
January 26, 2023 at 08:23
A crutch that only cripples you. :pray: After all, philosophical suicide is painless, no?
January 26, 2023 at 07:41
Ah yes. 'Placebo-fetish' (i.e. bullet to the brain!) is my preferred term of art.
January 26, 2023 at 07:31
So do you think either of the AlphaZero or Stockfish programs might become "the next Aristotle"? :smirk:
January 26, 2023 at 07:29
I ask you. :chin:
January 26, 2023 at 07:06
Why do you assume that? I've claimed the opposite with respect to morality more than once (links below) which you have either ignored or given vague m...
January 26, 2023 at 06:58
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6YoVJJmP_60 "All Along the Watchtower" (4:01) Electric Ladyland, 1968 writer R. Zimmerman, 1967 The Jimi Hendrix Experie...
January 26, 2023 at 05:28
In: Emergence  — view comment
I posted a link to a wiki article that summarizes the relevant physics. There's "the reason" – our current best theoretical explanation – for vacuum f...
January 26, 2023 at 03:43
In: Emergence  — view comment
There is not any experimental corroboration or theoretical function in fundamental physics for "God" but there are both for vacuum fluctuations.
January 26, 2023 at 03:14
Well, in that case, let's hope it's a sex goddess with a bawdy sense of humor that will forgive us fools for not believing (i.e. thinking). :death: :f...
January 26, 2023 at 02:35
No surprise there – I've never heard that one. :lol: ... because "that key" is only a symbolic artifact of one or more of our cognitive biases and thu...
January 26, 2023 at 01:53
"Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful." ~Lucius Annaeus Seneca This fact demonstrates ...
January 26, 2023 at 01:38
Mama Nature is an extravangtly wasteful (re: evolution e.g. supernovae, mass extinctions) and dangerous (re: absurdity e.g. "Medea") bitch, Smith, tha...
January 26, 2023 at 01:02
:up:
January 26, 2023 at 00:19
It doesn't follow from feeling haunted by ghosts that, in fact, "ghosts are real", does it? :meh: Hint: At least at the classical scale of everyday ex...
January 26, 2023 at 00:14
No doubt, if there is such a thing, "a common root" of thinking is Change. :fire: Philosophy, IMO, begins (again and again) wherever the question "How...
January 25, 2023 at 23:42
January 25, 2023 at 21:09
???
January 25, 2023 at 20:48
In: Emergence  — view comment
Let's see if @"Gnomon" responds... :zip:
January 25, 2023 at 13:23
In: Emergence  — view comment
There is no Why (which does not beg this Why question further); and as for the How, theoretical symmetry-breaking (i.e. vacuum fluctuations, etc) suff...
January 25, 2023 at 12:14
"Spiritual" means to me haunted by ghosts (and "religious" belonging to a spiritual community). This may be proof of feeling haunted, not "proof of gh...
January 25, 2023 at 10:38
In: Emergence  — view comment
:smirk: Maybe not ... https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/349320
January 25, 2023 at 10:23
Sure; but only the "naturally evolved" universe is fundamental, or real. The "simulations" are merely virtual.
January 25, 2023 at 10:15
Well my barber's name is Occam... A Matryoshka doll universe-simulation seems to me as silly as "geocentric epicycles" and "turtles all the way down"....
January 25, 2023 at 08:49
Like "Coke or Pepsi" ...
January 25, 2023 at 08:36
:up: Yeah, the universe-as-"computer" notion is like interpreting evolution as caused or directed by an "Evolver". Re: vestigial anthropomorphic bias ...
January 25, 2023 at 08:16
I see no "dilemma", Wayf. These positions are indistinguishable in my prayer book.
January 25, 2023 at 08:06
i.e. Natural selection :up:
January 25, 2023 at 07:45
Your argument is misguided, at best, Andrew. Nihilism is conventional, or common sense, 'god-of-the-gaps theism' and, therefore, a significant reason ...
January 25, 2023 at 07:41
Well maybe Nature quantum computes (with an OS like "MWI" or "M-theory" or "RQM"). :nerd:
January 25, 2023 at 07:08