Clearly the ability to detect certain things in language isn't something you possess. I was quoting you. I simply did not add quotations. Quite faceti...
There is no primary thing which something does. One word... evidence. It is obvious that this Is the case: if something had two primary modes of teleo...
And where did I say I disagree. Why can thing which has an end include that which it can do. Including stopping beating? I just disagree that this is ...
"You're seeing x being in state y due causal interaction with z as indicative of something not in x's nature." Perhaps. That isn't isolating it from t...
Secondly: you commit a fallacy in presuming that the state in which it can be in is teleological.. Or presumed to be intrinsic to it's nature on its o...
"No idea why I would think that." What kind of stupid answer is that? Where did I isolate the object from the rest of the world? And in any other sens...
Why are you certain that it is something that it can do, rather than it is lacking in what it can do.. being caused by some other alternative cause to...
It's either: 1. The nature of the heart is to beat until it no longer can. Or 2. The nature of the heart is to beat, and by some other cause it stops ...
I have read Camus, Sartre, Kierkegaard and many others. Some of what they say is good.. and others is absolute rubbish. Again: this is an argument bas...
Thats false in the way I used the word. And I specifically added 'telos' as well. We already discussed that the eyes are for seeing, the heart for pum...
By the shear manifestation of choice. We should not confuse the end of a thing with another. As I said before. Rather we should focus on the parts to ...
The problem with using the GTA is that anti-natalism bases itself in the objective idea that it is immoral to have children. The GTA is a goal-oriente...
I never said anything one can do is with the natural law- that is a strawman. And no, that is a false-comparison to say appealing to teleology is equa...
Oh my bad. I must not have caught that typo. Self-Consciousness possesses the ability to contradict the natural law because it manifests the will. But...
I already told you. You should give a look at Hegels idea of self-consciousness for these matters. Especially since this concept is that which manifes...
"There's nothing that the eyes can do that's not part of their nature." Hmmm.... you just accepted the idea of teleology. Teleology is that which is t...
And it should be made clear: that the natural law is in relation to teleology. Not the will and not to the individual in-and-of-itself. But rather the...
I'm assuming he's talking to me. Anti-natalism doesn't have to be forced for it to be evil. The same way murder is evil. Precisely why it is evil... y...
What argument do you have against teleology? And self-consciousness is not inherently contradictory to the natural law. So if teleology exists, it wou...
Oh Lord. Has the understanding of teleology in relation to ontology escaped you? It Was my point that self-consciousness, which manifests the will, is...
But as I said: Anti-natalism is the position that pregnancy, birth, etc- are all intrinsically evil because they induce suffering. However, there is o...
No it is unreasonable. Self-consciousnes brings are unnatural in-and-of-themselves because they can contradict the natural law. Which betrays a Darwin...
"If it is evil, why does it exist" was in reference to Gnosticism. Murder, rape and theft are not natural. They are not oriented in nature through som...
It is obvious that the position of antinatalism cannot be made to be one of an ethical position. The law, that is to say, the end of a thing by virtue...
Comments