You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Virgo Avalytikh

Comments

Well, thanks for the honesty.
July 30, 2019 at 19:30
It's not a matter of appealing to authority. It's simply a matter of sending you ad fontes so as not to multiply material unnecessarily. Why do you ne...
July 30, 2019 at 19:19
Maybe you're just accustomed to having things your own way, I don't know. But it's not unreasonable to expect some give-and-take here. There is plenty...
July 30, 2019 at 19:02
I was in two minds as to whether to respond to this. The subject of the thread is market failure, and its significance vis-à-vis libertarianism and th...
July 30, 2019 at 18:37
https://pm1.narvii.com/6129/48c754dec2835cbbccee7d5cc393a4ed69ea8649_hq.jpg
July 30, 2019 at 17:30
That's fine. As I said, stay tuned.
July 30, 2019 at 09:53
I just assumed you were asking me in good faith. If you have prejudged it as incurable then there's scarcely any sense in having a discussion, is ther...
July 30, 2019 at 09:40
These are important problems (though, it is rather question-begging to prejudge them as 'incurable'), but, since they take us far afield from the topi...
July 30, 2019 at 09:13
Thanks for this. You note quite rightly that I justify a presumption in favour of liberty only very briefly. The primary reason is that it is not the ...
July 30, 2019 at 08:47
Thanks for this. So in Aristotelian logic, 'All people are dinosaurs' does have existential import? Or is it just ambiguous? So, I agree with the cons...
July 28, 2019 at 09:13
I don't think it's the same person.
July 27, 2019 at 22:20
I don't know, I don't read the New York Times.
July 27, 2019 at 22:11
It's strange, Ayn Rand seems to be a household name in the USA. In the academic literature, she is hardly influential at all. As is often the way. I h...
July 27, 2019 at 22:06
Of that, I have no doubt. May I ask which right-libertarians you have read?
July 27, 2019 at 21:57
? I'm not being a bitch about anything. I'm just pointing out that for me to say 'Socialism is morally bankrupt' is the easy part. Justifying it is th...
July 27, 2019 at 21:54
Well, 'morally bankrupt' is quite a serious charge if you don't have anything with which to back it up. 'I wrote a book but then deleted it' isn't too...
July 27, 2019 at 21:48
Great, can I see the book?
July 27, 2019 at 21:40
Where have you outlined your views?
July 27, 2019 at 21:37
Wow. Talk about pulling a Chomsky.
July 27, 2019 at 21:32
Understandable. Coercion always looks attractive when the 'good guys' are doing the coercing. The problem is that coercion is always a predatory activ...
July 27, 2019 at 19:53
Anti-Statist and indifferent about it.
July 27, 2019 at 19:14
Haha, fair enough.
July 27, 2019 at 18:10
You sound like you'd be fun to debate.
July 27, 2019 at 18:00
May I ask (as a non-logician and a non-native speaker of English) why this does not commit the existential fallacy? I agree that A, B and D do not fol...
July 27, 2019 at 14:02
No, I think I am making largely the same critique of both, but the problem is more pronounced with Chomsky. The writings of many of Chomsky's syndical...
July 27, 2019 at 08:22
Of course, it is not a trivial undertaking if he is right, but whether he is right remains to be seen. It's not unreasonable to hold him to the same s...
July 27, 2019 at 07:54
I don't know, it seems a little cheap to me. Critiquing the status quo - even voluminously or insightfully - is a relatively trivial undertaking. Just...
July 27, 2019 at 03:29