More properly phrased, you know nothing about Rich until you observe Rich, and what observe about me may or may not be in concordance with what I obse...
The moon is actually just a quantum field which has no attributes. Everything we see and think about the moon is the result of observation. With quant...
A NASA scientist's perspective: "Let us ask a simple question: When you look up at night and "see" a star, what is "really" going on? A Newtonian phil...
All we know is that the moon is quanta which is essentially nothing. Anything you observe in your life is necessarily the result of the interaction be...
And this is known how? Roundness is an observation of a mind. Without the mind, the moon is just entangled quanta which is entangled with everything a...
Yes, the vulnerability comes in several forms. I believe the fundamental problem is (and I know I am in a distinct minority) is that math, by necessit...
A sensation it's a feeling of some sort. One would have to show that the brain is capable of feeling without resorting to anthropomorphism, a very tal...
Yes, all statements of what is believed to be a fact is done so in some symbolic language which is inevitably ambiguous for a variety of reasons. Math...
The thought itself, in memory is rather vague and fleeting. It doesn't stand still. Then there is the expression of that thought, by the mind which is...
The Laws of Nature can be viewed as One (the three words being considered one entity) but it appears to be much more than that (a myriad of almost und...
I don't think it is possible to have a measurement within a system without an observer. Everything is entangled. Any measurement (a process) will imme...
Philosophical ideas do not necessarily have to be approached from the point of view of which is more logical than the other. One can approach it, and ...
What is a perfectly good concept is really a matter of taste. Those who are looking for the utmost of simplicity will opt for God. A bit more complex ...
Or one can expunge the myriad of undefinable Laws of Nature that supposedly determines everything in the universe and replace them with God and make e...
Each individual makes some observation. When recalled from memory, the observer has a particular level of intensity of certainty about the observation...
Absolutely. All in one universe so we can actually explore the phenomenon. https://www.newscientist.com/article/2078251-quantum-weirdness-may-hide-an-...
To put a fine point on the issue: For determinists, everything is formed at the Big Bang (the scientific Genesis story) so the so-called Laws of Natur...
One must actually try to find truth in the mobility of thought and expression and actually observe the hopelessness in the effort. One cannot freeze t...
I would put it a little differently. The choice is: A) Experimentally verified entanglement at a distance (non-locality) or B) An a never ending,, gro...
I've read journals where they have referred to Everett's Many Worlds as Multi-verses, but it is off no matter, because it is impossible to describe or...
I will provide you a suggestion that will surely put you on a new path and create change if you are willing to change, and that is study the arts. Cho...
It is certainly an interesting question to ponder. Intelligence is exactly what what we perceive it to be. It has memory, it makes choices, it explore...
The difference lies in our understanding of the nature of the universe and what that might entail spiritually, metaphysically and physical practicalit...
The most straightforward place to start, is to take Descartes literally: "I think therefore I am. You are an intelligence (not confined to the physica...
Yes, this it's how far scientists are willing to go to preserve locality. They'll even present a never ending, every growing universe of multi-verses....
Of course, one can buy into an infinite number of universes to avoid non-locality. But then, what is being observed in all of these experiments? Bohm ...
It is an expression of what I believe. This I believe is a reasonable description that brings to me a better understanding of what I am and my relatio...
As I said, I understand they are my beliefs that are subject to constant change as my experience and knowledge grows. I find that I learn much more wh...
I just said I did in response to the same question from you above. I believe everything I say, I just don't elevate it to truth. I just leave myself l...
Nothing other than agreeing with you (now that I have corrected my mistakes) that you are simply expressing your beliefs and that is all you were tryi...
Oh, everything you said is your belief. Thanks for sharing them, but I don't share any of them. If you want to call them truths, it's fine with me, bu...
No, I believe what I believe. There is no greater or less than. I also believe that people who believe in truths constantly change what they believe i...
A belief is just a thought about some idea which we feel some personal intensity. Some people feel great intensity about their thoughts and call them ...
Not to someone who distinguishes "I believe" from "I know' and certainly a lot more meaningful that equating "I believe" to "I know". Basically your w...
In what frame of reference? Yours or mine? By the time you utter the sentence, the cat may no longer be on the mat. This is surely a subjective viewpo...
I mean we could speak to the masses, but then we would be subjected to argumentum ad populum. Or, we can agree that you have the final say, but then t...
Comments