You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

aRealidealist

Comments

What? Can you please rephrase the question. Do you mean, “WORK in our modern-world with 1000's of laws to abide by”?
May 09, 2020 at 21:29
Perhaps by the victim; or by people in a society who’ve agreed on upholding “social contracts”, that is, in order to be a citizen of the state, you’ve...
May 09, 2020 at 21:27
I don’t agree with that, as I believe in the maxim of, “you don’t know what you’ve got until it’s gone.” So that, in principle, the most effective way...
May 09, 2020 at 21:14
“I think it boils down to retaliation towards some perceived threat” — Right, as I’ve said in my first post, “negative reinforcement”, or just a negat...
May 09, 2020 at 21:06
“If people knew how many people actually DON'T get away with crimes, things would shift so dramatically.” — Exactly my point, only if people KNEW, the...
May 09, 2020 at 21:01
I guess that I would it explain by saying that the perpetrator doesn’t view/experience the consequence as being something negative, or just doesn’t kn...
May 09, 2020 at 20:48
If you can you give an example of such a scenario, I’m sure that I’d be able to better answer your question.
May 09, 2020 at 20:18
LOL :lol:
May 09, 2020 at 20:15
”But, does this have to be demonstrated in act only?” —... for beings without a higher cognition, like dogs or other animals, I would say, yes. For ex...
May 09, 2020 at 20:10
“What is the deeper point towards punishment”? — In my opinion, “negative reinforcement”; by associating something negative, or undesirable, with a gi...
May 09, 2020 at 19:26
Lol, his philosophy as a system is very much open to criticism; only on a superficial or surface level does it appear to be too well done, but it’s ac...
May 09, 2020 at 19:04
Excuse the late reply, as I’ve been quite occupied lately & haven’t had the time to check into my account. Yet, to the point... “Ideally too though, i...
May 09, 2020 at 16:20
Heraclitus himself, in fact, produced a manuscript of his own that was entitled, “On Nature”, which he submitted to the historically famous “Artemisiu...
January 06, 2020 at 07:49
There’s no equivocating, I’m using the word how it’s commonly understood; even how Spinoza understands it (in a general Cartesian sense). Moreover, yo...
October 28, 2019 at 04:41
There’s nothing else but substance to conceive of substance, sure, but the point is that there’s nothing else but substance to be conceived of as bein...
October 28, 2019 at 04:11
What does it mean for an “attribute” to be “necessary”? My point in the post of mine which you’ve quoted, is, that, merely stating that it “has” them,...
October 28, 2019 at 03:54
“Yes, we do claim states otherwise. He outright states substance is conceived through itself.” — The point is, though, him stating that “substance” is...
October 28, 2019 at 03:05
“You just keep on misconceiving ‘conceived through itself’" — I’m not misconceiving anything of the sort. Spinoza clearly only ever asserts “substance...
October 28, 2019 at 02:26
I didn’t equivocate, if anything, you did in the wording of your own question. How you don’t understand the difference between a thing & a conception ...
October 28, 2019 at 01:39
“Equivocating is when an author is using two different senses/acceptable uses/definitions of the same term in the same argument.”— Lol, I was only reu...
October 28, 2019 at 01:22
How is distinguishing between the thing of which one conceives, &, the conception itself, e.g, the sun is different from my conception of it, equivoca...
October 28, 2019 at 00:37
Anything besides direct quotes from Spinoza, for fuck’s sake, is irrelevant. You thinking otherwise is quite telling.
October 28, 2019 at 00:32
Being conceived counts as an instance of conception, but the thing of which one has a conception doesn’t. Very simple.
October 28, 2019 at 00:31
Nowhere does Spinoza speak of conceptions being self-caused (in the same way that the conception of eternity or an eternal thing isn’t itself eternal,...
October 28, 2019 at 00:28
Such your cheerleading self up, lol. You should get yourself some tutus & pom-poms from Walmart while you’re there picking up a personal copy of “Spin...
October 28, 2019 at 00:25
I’m not denying Spinoza’s definition, in as much as you’re just misunderstanding them. “Substance” isn’t a conception, in Spinoza’s philosophy, nor ca...
October 28, 2019 at 00:22
You haven’t made any case, you’re also making that up in your head, too, as far as I’m concerned; so rest or no rest, I’m carless either way. Moreover...
October 27, 2019 at 23:42
“.., and as such is a conception”— Substance isn’t a conception; this fact alone is enough to contradict your beliefs in regard to Spinoza.
October 27, 2019 at 23:11
The conception can be formed independently of every other conception, not independently of every thing, such as “substance”; thus there’s a distinctio...
October 27, 2019 at 23:07
Very strictly speaking, it’s ineffable, sure, but not imperceptible; so, as I’ve mentioned to the other fellow in one way or another, the words that a...
October 27, 2019 at 22:33
You know, let’s save that for another time, sorry. I’m sure that I’ll run into you again on the forum. Take care.
October 27, 2019 at 22:19
I’m only responding to the second half of your post, for the rest is ultimately irrelevant. Very simply put, is “substance” a conception? Is “substanc...
October 27, 2019 at 22:14
Firstly, what does “consciousness” mean to you? In order to begin to understand you from here, definitions must be sorted out. So what do you mean by ...
October 27, 2019 at 22:04
“the mind gets everything backwards and inside out when it goes off on its own and does not rely on omniscience as the source of truth” — You seem to ...
October 27, 2019 at 21:54
2– So, to be sure, just for my own sake, you’re claiming that color & sound are conscious, in the same which we would say an animal or human is?
October 27, 2019 at 21:45
1— It’s not so much talking about metaphysics as it’s thinking about it (quite the difference): again, don’t focus on the characters or words themselv...
October 27, 2019 at 21:38
1– It doesn’t require belief but does require the foundation of reality (so, no escape in that respect for you); the former, you have a lot of, while ...
October 27, 2019 at 20:58
1– .. except that possibilities are metaphysical, not merely objects of knowledge; if this weren’t the case, they would never in fact be possibilities...
October 27, 2019 at 20:43
1– So you’re rejecting real, or the reality of, possibilities? Logically speaking, that is, apriori, reality is the very foundation of possibility. Wh...
October 27, 2019 at 20:34
delete please
October 27, 2019 at 20:31
1– Notice that you avoided answering my question, as I somewhat thought that you would’ve, & simply proceeded to repeat your prior assertions/assumpti...
October 27, 2019 at 19:57
1– First things first, according to you, what is (by definition) a “substance” (such that a new one cannot be created)? Moreover, no, I’m not talking ...
October 27, 2019 at 19:31
A lot of what you say is opinion-based, & not strictly logically determined, even though I get the feeling that you believe differently. “No thing can...
October 27, 2019 at 19:09
The main question that your post revolves around, in my opinion, is that of creation. Based on what you say, how can a given consciousness be the crea...
October 27, 2019 at 17:03
“Spinoza's point is they are of identical reality. The a priori definition of the modes insentience and sentience in the attribute of thought are of t...
October 27, 2019 at 06:21
Determining distinctions between kinds of conception is one thing, understanding Spinoza another; your attempts at both, either way, are quite dissati...
October 27, 2019 at 05:13
The supposed force of the statements of the author in question are beside the point, if you understand them & thereby their flaws. “It also means, par...
October 27, 2019 at 03:14
Are you denying that “conceiving” or conception is a mode?
October 21, 2019 at 04:40
“Substance is in itself and conceives through itself.” — Substance is conceived through itself, granted, but the point is that the conception itself, ...
October 21, 2019 at 04:35
”Only reality (substance/justification) can predicate an instance of insentience or/and sentience (depending on what modes we are talking about).” — T...
October 21, 2019 at 04:29