NOS4A2

If reasonable people tell me they disagree, then hopefully they have a reasonable reason as to why they do. So tell me, why do accept Mueller’s judgem...

I’m not sure our traits are made for surviving and reproducing, as that assumes some sort of teleology. Unlike the worker ant, we are able to furnish ...

There is a DOJ investigation going on to understand the activities of U.S. and foreign intelligence services as well as non-governmental organizations...

Someone has to turn this ship around. It looks like Trump is the one doing it. We’ve had enough of the eloquent lawyers speaking in glittering general...

I’m not a lawyer, but Barr’s assessment makes sense: that little problem of proving corrupt intent, especially in an investigation with no underlying ...

Barr’s letter wasn’t a summary. He went over this in his testimony. You told me Barr was partisan. I asked how. You said Barr’s “summary” was differen...

yes, we are not slaves to our base impulses, which censors often imply. But they would make us slaves to their base impulses, their fears of future ca...

What’s wrong with that?

He was largely unsuccessful at getting Mexico to pay for the wall, but through pressure of the Mexican president, the threat of tariffs, he effectivel...

As I’ve previously stated I’m an unaffiliated voter. Do you know what that means? Hey, he tried. What more can you ask for?

It’s also a bottom-up approach, so to speak, because it is freely chosen rather than enforced from above.

According to Barr’s testimony to Congress, Barr talked to Mueller on the phone and asked whether his letter (so-called summary) was inaccurate. Muelle...

I have. So what’s partisan about Barr’s judgement again?

You asked seven questions. I answered many of them. But I never answer questions? Your lies are annoying. I’m not a lawyer, but Barr’s assessment make...

More breathless accusations. This is the going rate with anti-Trumpism.

If you don’t know why or are not willing to share why Barr is partisan, why make the claim?

Definitely 3 so long as it is voluntary. Unfortunately that might take a while.

Get this, but the “OK” symbol is now a hate symbol, according to the ADL. https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/us/adl-new-hate-symbols/index.html Just like ...

His truths, you mean. You’re lying to yourself.

How did Barr show himself to be partisan? Just more breathless accusations.

I’ve never stated Mueller establish no crime was committed. I’ve only stated and implied that he did not prove guilt of any crime. But yes we can agre...

Yeah, you’re pretty good at believing accusations without have bothered with the defense.

You referred to Mueller’s report to maintain that his reasoning was sound. I’m referring to the Attorney General and American law that shows that it’s...

It was a fake, invented accusation based on zero evidence beyond the accuser’s skull. I forget who it was, some Nixon fan, but he asked someone who le...

But it’s thoroughly consistent with the Attorney general’s judgement on the matter, which I hope you’re aware of. https://www.justice.gov/opa/speech/o...

Just curious, but do you require laws to teach you from right or wrong, or how to act in good conduct?

Adopting a nominalistic approach to thinking has fundamentally altered how I think about the world. It’s especially beneficial when applied to human b...

You’re an original, a one-of-a-kind, an object the world has never seen before your creation and will never see after you disappear. To see what you a...

That’s very true. Hopefully the FISA court and the DOJ gets a massive overhaul.

He did not, as the Attorney General ofThe United States concluded. No collusion. No obstruction. Mueller could have concluded Trump committed crimes, ...

I am not a lawyer, but neither Mueller or Barr said they should be pursued.

I didn’t mean that the special council convicted people of crimes. Only that they were determine whether crimes were being committed, ie conspiracy, o...

Uh yeah. The special council was determining whether crimes were being committed, and in fact determined many crimes were committed. The courts determ...

What? The point of a court is to administer justice. Law enforcement such as the DOJ determines whether crimes are committed.

The DOJ is to determine whether crimes have been committed and to prosecute those crimes under the principles of federal prosecution.

The Attorney General had to step in and issue a verdict because oddly the Special Council wouldn’t do it, which is why Barr wrote “no obstruction” in ...

Boston Dynamics is getting ready to gear up production on Spot. I imagine it will hit the market soon, taking the job of dogs everywhere. https://yout...

Either I’m in over my head or not. What was I wrong about?

Out of respect to the board and mods, here would be best. Begin any time.

I’ll wait.

I’ve given you thousands of opportunities to begin making your case. I don’t know what you’re waiting for.

How is it not? Show me how far I am in over my head. I don’t mind being corrected.

Mueller also said this: “Every defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty”. He said this in regards to the Russians. The presumptio...

We’d probably die out naturally, long before we could ever build such technology. It seems to me, though, that in order to build technology that might...

It’s not evidence of their guilt either. Investigations such as Mueller’s are not designed to prove innocence or exonerate anyone; they are to prove g...

If it involves Donald Trump put it here. We don’t need to poison these boards with trump debates.

Please, if you want to get started, make a case, whatever, just start.

I’ve answered many of your questions but you won’t answer one of mine. Scared?

Soon we will learn more about the origins of the Russia collusion hoax and possible FISA warrant abuses. The results of that investigation will be out...

In regards to hate speech, clearly appealing to the populace regarding laws doesn’t work, especially when applying that fallacy to, say slavery or law...