You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Thorongil

Comments

Then you should repent, otherwise you're damned. Or at least, for all we know you will be. It's still ultimately up to God. Dubitable. He would have t...
July 09, 2017 at 01:30
And perhaps not at all. Let me ask you a question: do you think the truth is capable of being exhaustively expressed in language? If you answer in the...
July 09, 2017 at 01:14
I might also mention that I'm not a Christian. I'm just taking such a position for the sake of argument.
July 09, 2017 at 00:51
Grace and mercy are not offered once. They are continually offered, since God's nature doesn't change. God's nature is goodness itself, so God can onl...
July 09, 2017 at 00:49
Not by itself, no, for that would be Pelagianism. God wills that all men are saved, which initiates our salvation. But we are then free to accept or r...
July 08, 2017 at 23:06
No, an undisclosed reason and one that is undisclosable in the sense of not being easily communicable to other people, I would say. I don't see this a...
July 08, 2017 at 22:43
And they're probably wrong to, as it's just lazy and welcomes misunderstandings. I'm guilty of it for sure. Regardless, I'm going to stick with what i...
July 08, 2017 at 21:48
How do you know that? No reason is given that we know of. There is a reason, but it will not be revealed to everyone in this life, and to those for wh...
July 08, 2017 at 21:32
One has to agree on definitions before arguments can be made. If we don't agree on what words like "existence" and "non-existence" entail, then we won...
July 08, 2017 at 21:29
Lol, so why ask it? You do that.
July 08, 2017 at 21:24
In some ways, this is a misleading dichotomy. One cannot exist without the other. In any case, you want to say that Orthodoxy has more thinkers who st...
July 08, 2017 at 20:53
No they aren't. Non-existence isn't a state anyone is in. To be in a state, one must first exist.
July 08, 2017 at 20:43
I discovered this book recently and added it to my list. You may find it interesting: http://undpress.nd.edu/books/P01064
July 08, 2017 at 20:42
For what reason it is unsubstantial and underwhelming?
July 08, 2017 at 20:42
You haven't shown to me that your point is correct. Of course Catholicism has mysticism. That's uncontroversial. But when asked to prove that Orthodox...
July 08, 2017 at 20:36
Dogmatically? To my knowledge, it has never done so and I see no reason why it should. It would first have to be clarified what the "the Catholic Chur...
July 08, 2017 at 19:56
I can't, if we can't even agree that existence and non-existence aren't comparable.
July 08, 2017 at 19:36
I've already replied to this statement. I can go no further in answering your original question until you address my reply.
July 08, 2017 at 19:26
Hence the rest of that sentence you quoted.
July 08, 2017 at 19:23
Which is what? Non-existence? That has no value and you've never experienced it, so you can't compare it to existence. The only way to find out would ...
July 08, 2017 at 17:38
Can you prove this, instead of simply declaring it to be so? And note once again that I will be ready with counter examples.
July 07, 2017 at 21:49
But this is absurd. Orthodoxy doesn't get to claim a pre-schismatic figure like Dionysius as solely its own simply on account of his being or writing ...
July 07, 2017 at 21:47
Or that.
July 07, 2017 at 18:21
I will not budge from thinking your statement that Orthodoxy is somehow more mystical and apophatic than Catholicism to be false. If you try and come ...
July 07, 2017 at 16:30
You're right, thanks. I thought about the instrument I play before I remembered the cherub's was a lute.
July 07, 2017 at 16:18
Mine is Musician Angel (1520) by Rosso Fiorentino. I like the melancholy expression on the cherub's face and the fact that he's playing a lute. My sta...
July 07, 2017 at 16:15
Lol. Says you. Maybe they did. I will certainly be returning to them in my studies, but that doesn't discount the fact that, for me, Kant has provided...
July 05, 2017 at 00:55
About what? I still subscribe to transcendental idealism, if that's what you meant by "Kantianism." As for why I think it's right, that would require ...
July 03, 2017 at 23:27
>:O I had the same reaction when I reached the end.
July 03, 2017 at 23:07
Also, the old PF link doesn't work, alas.
July 03, 2017 at 18:46
I could swear you did. The contents are cloudy, but I can picture it in my mind. I care less about its utility than I do its truth. I would only have ...
July 03, 2017 at 18:40
Probably because local governments and police forces are, in part, implicated in such dealings or blackmailed. I want to say, though, that organized c...
July 03, 2017 at 00:10
Think you had a quote from him. I've seen this claim before. Do you know what sources you got this from or did you just reason to this conclusion your...
July 02, 2017 at 22:13
No more Witty or Schop I see. I'm surprised by Aquinas in their place. An Eastern Orthodox whose favorite philosopher is Aquinas is rather amusing. Ni...
July 02, 2017 at 18:56
I prefer apple hash.
July 02, 2017 at 01:42
.... https://68.media.tumblr.com/368d7dbffbe5f5f651db447592012964/tumblr_inline_oov9qpGzxb1rh53c4_500.gif
June 30, 2017 at 23:24
That's what you have to argue for in order for what you say to make any sense. So get to it. What is the soul and how does it pre-exist the body?
June 30, 2017 at 17:51
Except it's not. No one can exist before they exist, so you can't force the non-existent to exist. This is a logical refutation of your argument, show...
June 29, 2017 at 15:48
Sigh... we just had a thread on this exact topic. The argument is bunk because there is no one to harm. QED.
June 29, 2017 at 00:44
Yes, this is basically my position now too.
June 27, 2017 at 21:06
Because you responded to me, silly!
June 27, 2017 at 21:05
Yeah, that statement is clearly false. Lots of things exist (are not nothing) that are not perceptible.
June 27, 2017 at 20:59
Okay, but this is clearly false.
June 27, 2017 at 20:54
I don't understand this at all. How are they not?
June 27, 2017 at 20:21
"But I am aware of some that murmur: What, say they, if all men should abstain from all sexual intercourse, whence will the human race exist? Would th...
June 27, 2017 at 19:27
If by begging the question you mean the petitio principii fallacy, then I disagree. There are plenty of arguments for God that don't commit this falla...
June 27, 2017 at 19:23
I don't think I know enough about it to have a position on it. As a species of Platonism, I suppose I'm certainly not opposed to it.
June 25, 2017 at 21:16
I think we can say that sex as we know and experience it didn't exist.
June 25, 2017 at 21:13
Either that the individual who claims to be an agnostic fails to find arguments both for and against the existence of God convincing or that God's exi...
June 25, 2017 at 18:27
These are not parallel schools of thought. Some are -isms relating to moral positions, others to metaphysical positions, and some to both. I put other...
June 25, 2017 at 16:15