You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Thorongil

Comments

Lol, you would frequent there.
August 16, 2017 at 23:15
We were talking about God causing an event that we know from the law to be evil, like murder. You replied by saying that, if God caused the event, it ...
August 16, 2017 at 22:57
I find capriciousness and evil to be highly incomprehensible actually. Whether theism is true or not, evil often defies easy explanation.
August 16, 2017 at 22:18
Oi vey.... I do. I'm tempted to challenge this, but I'll provisionally say yes. X could only refer to the moment of conception, in which case we're ta...
August 16, 2017 at 22:11
The left has cried wolf too many times, but they're in so deep that they're oblivious of this fact and so simply double down on it.
August 16, 2017 at 21:57
The Antifa/BLM people and the Neo-Nazi/white supremacist people are mirror images of each other. A pox on both their houses I say. Both buy into the r...
August 16, 2017 at 16:42
They were.
August 16, 2017 at 16:37
Have you ever heard of Markus Gabriel? https://www.amazon.com/Why-World-Does-Not-Exist/dp/0745687563
August 16, 2017 at 01:38
Let's look at it again, then. My claim is that birth itself is not a harm. You then said: I thought you were agreeing with me here. But looking at thi...
August 15, 2017 at 23:54
I don't think he's out of the woods yet, as I too detect something similar to what you do in him.
August 15, 2017 at 22:52
Damn. I'm sorry that happened. I guess it goes to show that ideas have consequences, as Richard Weaver would say, sometimes physically deleterious one...
August 15, 2017 at 22:47
I myself am not opposed to taking action on what are recognized by all to be things deleterious to the natural environment. I am opposed to the idea t...
August 15, 2017 at 22:32
Are you being serious?
August 15, 2017 at 22:24
Poppycock. This is to say that evil is not evil. This returns us to your original argument, which I only granted for the sake of argument. I suppose t...
August 15, 2017 at 22:23
http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/013/113/hahaha-no.gif
August 15, 2017 at 22:12
That would have been impressive!
August 15, 2017 at 21:29
It took me a long while to realize he was trolling me because I honestly never expected him to take to trolling. I was trying in good faith to present...
August 15, 2017 at 20:45
But I just said he's probably trolling, which was confirmed in the Shoutbox. Sue me for not seeing it as fast as you would like. I honestly never expe...
August 15, 2017 at 20:41
Wow. So you were trolling.
August 15, 2017 at 20:34
Who?
August 15, 2017 at 20:31
You have some lemons, some water, and some sugar. Making lemonade requires mixing lemon juice from the lemons with the water and sugar. This means the...
August 15, 2017 at 20:25
Wow. You must be trolling me. I don't know how else to account for such brazen stubbornness.
August 15, 2017 at 20:19
If "at the moment" still presupposes the lemons' prior existence in your mind, it doesn't. It contradicts this statement:
August 15, 2017 at 20:14
Darth, I refuse to accept that you are this daft. The point I just made to you was that, if you acknowledge ANY duration of a lemon's existence BEFORE...
August 15, 2017 at 20:09
Your own damn words! Here you acknowledge that lemons do need to exist before making lemonade. The duration of their existence is irrelevant. Whether ...
August 15, 2017 at 20:02
What the deuce is your problem here. You have made both of the following statements: 1. Lemons do not need to exist before making lemonade 2. Lemons d...
August 15, 2017 at 19:57
Then to hell with the Epicurean position! I never said I was an Epicurean. You're not listening to what I'm saying. To be harmed requires that a perso...
August 15, 2017 at 19:46
You contradicted yourself, and I've shown why. Telling me to "reread" what you wrote, instead of explaining why my assertion that you have contradicte...
August 15, 2017 at 19:38
Because there is no person to harm, prior to it, like there is in the case of death.
August 15, 2017 at 19:36
Let me add that this comment itself perpetuates what you see as circularity, because it refuses to address what I'm saying. Consider again, for a mome...
August 15, 2017 at 19:35
You're asking how nonexistence can harm them, and I agree that it can't. Death itself harms the person, not the after death state, of which you refer....
August 15, 2017 at 19:28
Look at the word I bolded. Oh. Can the dying person benefit from or be harmed by his own death? Initially, I would say no and probably for the same re...
August 15, 2017 at 19:21
:-} As for the first question, that depends on context. I agree in principle with the death penalty, for example. So I do think people can benefit fro...
August 15, 2017 at 19:05
No, pessimists clearly don't all think that. I still consider myself a pessimist, but I don't consider being born a harm, strictly speaking. Ah, final...
August 15, 2017 at 18:56
But I don't disagree with this. Never have. Once born, people are exposed to harmed. What I have consistently objected to is the claim that being born...
August 15, 2017 at 14:03
In: Sexism  — view comment
Believe what you like.
August 15, 2017 at 13:53
Do we really know this, though, or are we simply projecting what we think they would have thought onto them? Well, was there any alternative? Civiliza...
August 15, 2017 at 13:52
In: Sexism  — view comment
Because they're in the business of brainwashing.
August 15, 2017 at 13:42
In: Sexism  — view comment
You asked for opinions on whether certain of Agustino's comments were sexist and got mixed replies. The policy statement is not in question, but wheth...
August 15, 2017 at 12:54
In: Sexism  — view comment
But... this assumes you know what sexism is. If sexism means "whatever Mongrel and Baden deem to be sexist," then anything could be sexist, and that's...
August 15, 2017 at 02:34
It feels like you're pulling my leg now. If they exist at the time of making lemonade, then they existed before one made lemonade.
August 15, 2017 at 02:31
In: Sexism  — view comment
Yes, I know. As I said, I'm intelligent enough to know how to stay hired without accepting their brainwashing attempts and thus maintain my integrity.
August 15, 2017 at 02:28
In: Sexism  — view comment
HR people are not to be charmed but laughed at and shunned.
August 15, 2017 at 02:26
In: Sexism  — view comment
It won't work. I have too much integrity and intelligence.
August 15, 2017 at 02:25
In: Sexism  — view comment
Fine. You want to be able to throw around the label without actually having to define it. Don't choke on that cake.
August 15, 2017 at 02:22
In: Sexism  — view comment
You pity them, do you? Why, that sounds a bit sexist to me.
August 15, 2017 at 02:21
In: Sexism  — view comment
I should have. What's sexism?
August 15, 2017 at 02:17
In: Sexism  — view comment
Alas, no. Now, about my question.
August 15, 2017 at 02:16
In: Sexism  — view comment
Hey @"Mongrel", could you actually define "sexism" for us?
August 15, 2017 at 02:15
Yes. This is a clear bait, and I'm not taking it. I explained my views as thoroughly as I can and so will leave it at that.
August 15, 2017 at 02:10