You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Thorongil

Comments

Because they want to die, they know it doesn't matter that they carry ID or pay for a truck with their own credit cards.
August 21, 2017 at 20:59
No. Show me. No, examples like these don't affect my position. One can be mistaken about what constitutes a good intention, such that even if one thin...
August 21, 2017 at 20:57
They're planning on dying in the process, otherwise they don't receive the rewards of martyrdom.
August 21, 2017 at 16:59
Yes, in the sense of being the cause of the event. The stone is responsible for it, but it isn't morally responsible, clearly. I think there may be pr...
August 19, 2017 at 22:11
I distinguished between moral blame, which is to assign moral responsibility, and simply blame, which is to assign causal responsibility. This questio...
August 19, 2017 at 22:00
Bad parenting and anti-intellectual sub-cultures.
August 19, 2017 at 20:24
Blameworthy and negligent, yes, undoubtedly, but not morally so. I'm still missing the reason why it is the latter. The problem is that your position ...
August 19, 2017 at 20:19
Out of curiosity, why?
August 19, 2017 at 19:12
Correct. I see nothing absurd about this. You are at fault, may have to pay damages, etc, but not morally at fault. If there was no malicious intent t...
August 19, 2017 at 18:59
Because being the cause of something isn't the same as to be morally blameworthy. That ought to be a simple distinction to understand. The lack of int...
August 19, 2017 at 17:34
In the sense that you are the cause of it. It doesn't matter. The lack of intent is the same in both cases.
August 18, 2017 at 22:34
Correct. You are to blame for the action, but not morally to blame. If an inanimate object caused the explosion, has it done wrong? Like you, it never...
August 18, 2017 at 22:27
Fine. I still disagree. If you kill someone but don't intend to, I wouldn't say that you've committed wrongdoing. There's a difference between wrongdo...
August 18, 2017 at 22:17
Why?
August 18, 2017 at 22:05
Assuming he does, then if he chooses to fend off his attacker and in so doing happens to kill him, despite not intending to, then he had the right to....
August 18, 2017 at 21:54
But how do we determine the morality of an action if not the intent of the agent who performed it? The only other way to determine it is by the conseq...
August 18, 2017 at 21:50
I tend to agree. Science deals with how things are, given our means of measurement, as opposed to why things are or are the way they are.
August 18, 2017 at 21:40
Sucrose.
August 18, 2017 at 21:34
But it would be morally permissible to kill your assailant in self-defense. That wouldn't be murder but manslaughter. Look up the principle of double ...
August 18, 2017 at 21:31
But as I told you in the other thread, killing in self-defense is not murder. It's manslaughter.
August 18, 2017 at 21:27
I sometimes wonder if those of us who don't get along on this forum would get along in real life and those of us who do get along on this forum wouldn...
August 18, 2017 at 18:56
Some nice looking nuts you've got there.
August 18, 2017 at 18:52
One day, we might be calling it St. Pascal's Wager: https://www.christiancentury.org/article/blaise-pascal-blessed-doubter
August 18, 2017 at 17:25
But how can it not be? Look at your first premise: Here you speak of humans, plural. Your clause at the end speaks of structural suffering, which refe...
August 18, 2017 at 16:45
Where in that quote did you surmise this? The bolded part? As far as I can tell, you just pulled this accusation from your rear end. It's ironic, beca...
August 18, 2017 at 16:28
This doesn't make any sense to me. You exist from the moment of conception until death. I am talking to an adult human being. If we wind back the cloc...
August 18, 2017 at 04:07
That's fine, as long as you realize you're actually at odds with your own church's teaching on this.
August 18, 2017 at 03:33
Phew. Google's SafeSearch not so safe it seems.
August 18, 2017 at 03:26
I hesitate to post it again, but if you do a Google search for Three Stooges GIFs, you can find lots of them, including the one I used. Curly and Moe ...
August 18, 2017 at 03:09
Looking at the thread, I see you deleted my reply with the Three Stooges GIF. I wasn't aware the antics of vaudeville comics constituted pornography. ...
August 18, 2017 at 03:03
What did I post? I genuinely have no idea what you're talking about.
August 18, 2017 at 03:00
You sort of implied that you thought this, in the past tense. What is your position now? Do you accept the principle of double effect?
August 18, 2017 at 02:12
I see. Well, did you ever consider becoming a Jain?
August 18, 2017 at 02:08
Where are you getting the idea that all killing is wrong? Have you not heard of the principle of double effect, which is taught by the Catholic Church...
August 18, 2017 at 02:05
This is enormously underrated, I find. Inasmuch as philosophy is the pursuit of wisdom, he's far wiser than most of us.
August 17, 2017 at 22:31
(Y)
August 17, 2017 at 22:24
Females today are not fragile little creatures needing your protection. No, but I would be as hands off as possible. I requested this before, but ther...
August 17, 2017 at 22:24
The EU and Merkel's immigration and open door refugee policies could not have been more disastrous for Europe. One by one, each European country has b...
August 17, 2017 at 22:17
It's not so much that I feel offended, but that I find you to be a rather offensive and offense-taking person. I've never reported you or anyone else....
August 17, 2017 at 21:49
Kevins, no apostrophe. No, apparently you need to talk about Kevin and are so desperate to talk about him that you have created a thread nine miles lo...
August 17, 2017 at 21:28
Yes! But if you grant, as you have here, that you exist at the moment of conception, then "coming into existence" isn't a harm, because there is no on...
August 17, 2017 at 20:48
I suggest watching this video, especially at 8:03: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVlmfGfEWDc
August 17, 2017 at 17:44
The "no one" referred to the nonexistence of any person prior to conception. We can trace your existence all the way back to the point at which an egg...
August 17, 2017 at 17:30
Yes, and we can be reasonably certain that "go fuck yourself" was followed by "don't make me smack a bitch" on the part of the first person's interloc...
August 17, 2017 at 03:15
Found an interesting, relevant article. I quote from the final paragraph: So, Agustino, I don't think Beebert and I are off the mark in detecting Prot...
August 17, 2017 at 02:55
Followed by "you."
August 17, 2017 at 02:39
I find it ironic that Agustino expressly and quite legitimately requested that this thread be devoted to his suggestion and not to the topic of sexism...
August 17, 2017 at 00:21
Yeah, maybe so.
August 16, 2017 at 23:58
I'm not sure "informed" is the right word for that sub. I mostly use the BBC now, which I balance out with conservative journals and magazines.
August 16, 2017 at 23:24
http://www.reactiongifs.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/oh-snap.gif
August 16, 2017 at 23:22