You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

god must be atheist

Comments

I.... am not so sure about that. A finch or a warbler or a gold fish could think the same of its own kind, and declare that humans behave colorfully, ...
November 17, 2020 at 07:23
Depends how you define ham sandwich and heavenly bliss. If heavenly bliss involves never getting to the washroom, because it's such a dirty, unholy th...
November 16, 2020 at 02:18
Ouch.
November 16, 2020 at 02:10
The laws of probability compares, as a ratio, what the outcome is, related to what the expectation of the outcome is. There is no probabiliy of causat...
November 13, 2020 at 22:30
It is not to be our worry why he does what he does. Let him be and don't let him negatively influence you. He is an autonomous human being, and we mus...
November 13, 2020 at 22:20
I guess it's his privilege, as it is our privilege to behave any way we want. I don't like him at all, but I guess he figures (no knowledge claimed, I...
November 13, 2020 at 22:15
ayy. Is it not your will that makes you decisions, but something else? That is bizarre. You state that your will is determined. But your choices are n...
November 13, 2020 at 22:07
you're right Why then did I say this? It was simply posted to help you to realize that rational thoght also influences the will, free or not. You spec...
November 13, 2020 at 22:04
In response to the OP: human nature is manifold, and that is why it appears to be a subject of philosophy: something that humans can't grasp yet, they...
November 13, 2020 at 21:59
The biological thinkers? You mean that all others are also biological thinkers, all philosophers, etc.? Becasue they are thinkers based on a biologica...
November 13, 2020 at 21:54
You'd be right except that conscious, emotional and rational influences also affect free will, not only subcounscious, unconscious ones. So debate is ...
November 13, 2020 at 21:48
In other word: the OP simply had a choice, which he had worked out rather skillfully: "Either I believe in God, or in Free Will, but I can't believe i...
November 13, 2020 at 21:42
There is, however some value for me in the view of the OP. If humans had free will, in the sense of classical philosophy, then the causation chain wou...
November 13, 2020 at 21:36
Aside from all arguments presented, without making a choice who is right and who is wrong, and without the assumption of a master plan or with the ass...
November 13, 2020 at 21:30
Maybe we need to drop an apple on it to make it accelerate. Seriously speaking, yes, when you drop the apple, it accelerates toward the Earth, and he ...
November 13, 2020 at 21:11
Actually, after blasting @"Noble Dust" I gave myself to thinking. Maybe I am and have been looking at this issue too dogmatically. It dawned on me tha...
November 13, 2020 at 20:54
thank you. I think it came to focus here: I still have questions that need to be clarified. (1) I state a proposition P. (2) Then I state ~P. (3) whic...
November 13, 2020 at 13:12
I honestly seek forgiveness from you and extend an apology for the little psychoanalysis I have attempted. This was uncalled for on my part, and I apo...
November 13, 2020 at 12:51
If you can't figure out on your own any causal explanations to guide my will to do this, then there is no way anyone else can explain it to you, eithe...
November 13, 2020 at 12:24
This is brilliant, TMF! I like this. And I think we found that person already, s/he's joined this thread and I so rudely dismissed him or her! Noble D...
November 13, 2020 at 11:59
I'll read your response and reply at another time; my brain still hurts from absorbing the replies from Noble Dust. I need to take a breather. Will co...
November 13, 2020 at 07:26
Jesus the Lord Christ. This is going from nowhere to nothing. Please don't do this to me, Oh Lord. Noble Dust, I am sorry, but the difference in our u...
November 13, 2020 at 07:24
These are descriptions of your own sentiments that you attach to words and concepts. That is nice. But it can't be disagreed with, so there you go, no...
November 13, 2020 at 07:15
You are adding a whole bunch of EXTRENOUS qualifiers. Yes, the two images CAN be made different; but there are instances when they are not different. ...
November 13, 2020 at 07:05
I do not accept this definition. It is incomplete. if you use this definition, you throw away the difference between "difference" and "distinction". D...
November 13, 2020 at 06:56
Now, this I understand. This makes sense, and I fully agree with it. I just wish to add that while you may be right in saying that greed is not a virt...
November 13, 2020 at 06:38
Okay, that's different. So in what way is it wrong to frame the question? A direct and logical criticism is something I can deal with, in which you de...
November 13, 2020 at 06:34
The starting point of WHAT? It has to be a starting point of something or other, which you haven't named. I can't put words in your mouth. Please stat...
November 13, 2020 at 06:28
That's a different quesion, requiring a different answer. I wish to have the discussion on this thread to focus and deal with the "free of" aspect, an...
November 13, 2020 at 06:23
Let's for a moment accept that philosophy possesses no legitimacy. Then the question "Does philosophy possess legitimacy" can't be answered philosophi...
November 13, 2020 at 06:20
Free fall is not a velocity. It is an acceleration where the gravitational force acts on your mass, and your mass inertia provides the counter force t...
November 13, 2020 at 01:15
I am sorry, jgill, I don't understand your objection... mainly because you did not support it with well-researched quotation from the Internet, which ...
November 11, 2020 at 22:55
Not at all. Your initial defintion of metaphysics is this: You wrote this. Your definition. Your words. Verbatim. Please don't deny this, because even...
November 11, 2020 at 22:52
They are different because you made several mistakes in the structuring of your original post. I pointed the mistakes out in my immediately preceding ...
November 11, 2020 at 22:35
Contradictions in classical logic are allowed as conclusions. They are used to prove a proposition false. It's called recuctio ad absurdum... if you c...
November 11, 2020 at 22:34
The starting point of a proof or of an argument is never a contradiction. And a contradicion is never a starting point. I have never seen an argument ...
November 11, 2020 at 22:31
For your information only, Engineer1952, this is complete nonsense to your readers. You need to force yourself to learn to communicate more meaningful...
November 11, 2020 at 09:51
Yes, you're back on track in my books. Differences don't take a man off the track. Not recognizing differences or similarities does. You are okay. I w...
November 11, 2020 at 09:45
Well, the question is a bit ambivalent. If I see a house, I see a house, so the image is in my mind (in my head) and outside. There is no difference. ...
November 11, 2020 at 09:31
This is not coming from a dicitonary, but from my own analysis of how I use and how I've ever seen used these two words: distinciton and difference. A...
November 11, 2020 at 09:21
This is a first occurrance of naming size of faith by volume. A person has a faith the size of a mustard seed. The other person has faith of a bucket ...
November 11, 2020 at 09:02
Because the difference is a complete nonsequitor. Come over to my place, move the mountain in front of my house, and I'll change my by your unapproved...
November 11, 2020 at 08:49
You are saying nobody has any faith, not even like a grain of mustard seed. No occurrance of moving mountains by saying a few words, and by saying a f...
November 11, 2020 at 08:43
Written by a technically illiterate person. 1. He says the same thing three times. 2. He does not realize that he just did that. 3. he calls the one a...
November 11, 2020 at 08:37
I'm sorry, but while all along this post you're right, you are not making an argument that has any effect on mine. Rights do not equate to actual stat...
November 11, 2020 at 08:31
You are actually almost right about that. I reject any hint of supernatural explanations of phenomena. And you're right, it is my beleif and if you li...
November 11, 2020 at 08:24
I don't understand the logical link you employ, and I think it is not true, when you say (paraphrased) that "omnibelenevolence necessitates non-interf...
November 11, 2020 at 08:11
It is interesting how little credit you give me in understanding your concept of parallel between god and a parent. My point was you can't STOP sudden...
November 11, 2020 at 08:00
I am afraid you and I are getting further and further away from understanding the other. What a shame.
November 11, 2020 at 07:46
re your op your only support is your good parent analogy and thus your failure too A parent will alleviate harmful competition among her kids. God doe...
November 10, 2020 at 23:12