Hmmm, I don't think there is much "trust" in a relationship where cheating occurs. There are ways to catch people - similar tactics as were used by so...
:-O I don't see how that is true. Say I am a woman, and you ask me if your boyfriend cheated on you. I may say "oh, I definitely heard some rumours" a...
This response is rather confusing for me because which head is the lower one is relative... relative to whether the person is lying down, standing, et...
Why do you call it the "consumption" model? Consumption implies that it is something that one must do over and over again, there is no terminus. Where...
Which head is nicer to deal with do you think? One head seems to be quite dumb, so I imagine it's easy to trick it, but at the same time it's very ene...
>:O LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL... Yes, but those same males will tell you that when one head rules, the other is silent - so effectively, the body still has onl...
Yes, actually that is one of the reasons why I found myself gravitating towards self-employment and now entrepreneurship. Working in a team often invo...
That's not exactly true. If you look at the process of evolution theoretically, then... well let me draw a diagram. https://image.ibb.co/hgxYnG/evolut...
I would have voted "No", "No", and "Platonism" most likely. To the first "No" because I don't think there is any such thing as progress in philosophy....
How do you know this is the truth though? Maybe she didn't cheat. I mean unless you saw it yourself, then it will always remain somewhat doubtful in m...
So if the mouse gets a bigger heart, then of course pulse rate will change. Likewise, if the mouse grows much bigger through the resizing, with more c...
This is probably wrong - the "only ever" is probably wrong. What you should say is that immanence restricts the possibilities of form, not that it out...
Sure, but there's nothing contradictory in it. It's just a waste of material. Scaling an elephant to the size of a mouse would be more plausible than ...
It might be possible, although it's difficult to state for sure. Bodies are self-adapting organisms. Take the human heart. It usually beats at 60bpm -...
And building on that, likewise, your body is also a cumulation of experiences, and nothing more. So in the end, it's all experience - both your body a...
The sun is nothing apart from your experience of it. So the warmth + the sight + etc. all the other impressions of it. Why do you feel the need to pos...
Notice the continuation "if by that we mean outside of experience"? I will take that as a yes. If so, then no, I disagree. The smoke and the assumed f...
I don't think it makes sense to talk of things "outside" of us, if by that we mean outside of experience. Our body is known within experience, and it ...
I don't think you've read Kant. Or at any rate understood what he was saying. If you did, you would know that Kant spoke of transcendental conditions ...
In addition to my previous remarks, consider a game. I play a game when the experience of seeing a stick bent in water is the signal to participants i...
No, there is no thing apart from the thought. The thing is the thought. Or if you don't like it this way, there is one thought (the word) and another ...
This isn't saying anything really. All that you're telling me is that I learn how to manipulate my experience better. I know that if a ball goes out o...
Just that you are developing concepts in experience (such as "being born", "physical structures"), and then turn around and use them to explain the ca...
It's not future, it's happening right now, not in the future. If I have a thought, that thought occurs now, not in the future. So what future are you ...
How do you know this? Is it because you've developed certain concepts based on experience, such as bodies, etc. and then applied them out of experienc...
That makes no sense to me philosophically (at least for the purposes of this thread). It only makes sense within a limited scientific discourse. That ...
You're already stuck in a theoretical understanding here, where you assume that you are a child, with a physical body, etc. That's not interesting. I'...
Can you please answer the question: I know that the concept of individuation will only enter awareness AFTER experience, that doesn't mean that it doe...
That's not true. Let me illustrate. Abstraction is something that happens after experience. For experience to occur, I must be able to distinguish bet...
We weren't discussing God, I asked you an epistemological question. How do we know "individuation" granted that we must already be able to individuate...
Yes, what about it? That means exactly what I said above. Individuation does not mean just individuation into a person as distinct from other persons....
Well that's not what I said. I said we cannot have any experience without individuating things - into red, blue, sweet, sour, etc. That individuation ...
I agree. It doesn't follow though that the concept comes from experience itself. What does this have to do with the concept of an "individual"? I don'...
Sure. So in experience we find impressions - the impressions of red, yellow, hard, soft, sweet, sour, etc. Where amongst those impressions is there an...
The video discusses at length the fact that animal cells of both elephants and mice are around the same size. They do not say that the animals will di...
If I say: "Say I go to the moon and look for gold" does that mean I'm an astronaut? Or if I say: "Say I sell $1000 worth of gold, and reinvest the mon...
Comments