You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Agustino

Comments

LOL - he certainly chose one which makes it quite difficult to get to the "motions of procreation"... there are much easier alternatives, you know :) ...
September 09, 2016 at 13:47
The parable has a very specific meaning which is about the importance of faith. As outlined by Kierkegaard, Abraham trusted, even if he could not see ...
September 09, 2016 at 12:58
This is very strange because you know that virtue ethics existed before deontological ethics, and they are accepted as Christian ethics by many theolo...
September 09, 2016 at 12:16
The problem with such arguments are that they are founded on something that is inherently unstable and subject to change - namely the current scientif...
September 09, 2016 at 12:09
Too black and white to answer :)
September 09, 2016 at 10:08
Hanover is the codename for the FBI and the other hedge fund special interests?
September 08, 2016 at 21:44
Right, you forgot who the boss of that guy is...
September 08, 2016 at 21:36
I think we should get some affirmative action about this... I mean it's just so unfair you know... :D I propose free skin-care for white people!
September 08, 2016 at 21:23
Yeah, it's the guy who has about three times the percentage of Jill Stein in the polls :P But you seem to have some keen interest in the fair sex. Let...
September 08, 2016 at 21:02
Ah yes - I thank God for that every night! :D
September 08, 2016 at 20:57
Yes! Especially this one... :D (this must be who @"Sapientia" is voting for, him being the cool libertarian, sans-culotte, 'everyone is free' - 'liber...
September 08, 2016 at 20:19
Oh I forgot to mention the GREAT Norman Vincent Peale... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9lm2y_4cAE This is where Donald J. Trump learned the art of ...
September 08, 2016 at 20:05
LOL if you wish :D
September 08, 2016 at 20:03
Sure but there's no point to dispute over. We both stated our positions, haven't we? :)
September 08, 2016 at 19:52
That sounds like "we're going to win big league" to me.
September 08, 2016 at 19:43
From the current US candidates Trump is the only one who has the capacity to be a leader. Not saying anything about his morality and his character - j...
September 08, 2016 at 18:38
LOL :D
September 08, 2016 at 13:47
Thanks for clarifying :)
September 08, 2016 at 12:18
Okay, I agree that it's the right message, but what does that mean? What counts as homophobic? In common discourse in todays world, many things are as...
September 08, 2016 at 12:16
Yes very good points! I thought much the same. Furthermore, the racist/homophobic/sexist distinction looks potentially dangerous, as these terms are n...
September 08, 2016 at 11:46
Thank you, but I must say your agreement puzzles me :D Buddhism emphasises annata - which seems to be very contrary to what I say. More like what I de...
September 08, 2016 at 11:23
Clearly if there is a sense of lack it can be resolved only by fulfilling that lack. Any other solution (for example getting rid of the person/self wh...
September 08, 2016 at 11:02
:D LOL! >:)
September 06, 2016 at 21:06
What do you mean you're skeptical of God's existence? How is your day to day life different because of this skepticism that you claim?
September 06, 2016 at 21:05
Well let's see - what do you think God calls a sin?
September 06, 2016 at 21:03
No you actually can't. You can make a claim though, but that wouldn't mean it's "valid", if by that you mean true. Second of all the existence of sin ...
September 06, 2016 at 21:02
I have difficulty in understanding what you mean by not believing in God - what does it mean not to believe in God? How do you act and go around diffe...
September 06, 2016 at 20:53
Let's see - to sin or not to sin - that's the vulgar understanding of free will. If that is so, then you must admit the possibility of sin for free wi...
September 06, 2016 at 19:04
I knew you'd say this :) - of course, if you are right, then I'm the gnostic, only that I don't think you have your facts (which ground your understan...
September 06, 2016 at 18:51
No - they thought slavery was an evil, but a necessary one (hence the some are slaves by nature from Aristotle), and therefore supported it, because e...
September 06, 2016 at 18:32
LOL! :-* Maybe you meant that the ruling class was no better off than slaves in their subjection to the citizens... The guardians (ruling class) were ...
September 06, 2016 at 18:03
Yes, I am especially surprised as most conservatives nowadays tend to be religious and yet, I can find nothing in religion which supports rampant capi...
September 05, 2016 at 13:38
First I think it is good to have an introduction of Voegelin's thought for this discussion. On the internet there are quite a few sources. Here. Here ...
September 05, 2016 at 13:22
They did, only that it was transcendent. You would never be immanently free (or you would never immanently achieve spiritual liberation, in this life)...
September 04, 2016 at 13:08
What do you think (both of you) about Eric Voegelin's account which actually points to Gnosticism as the cause behind both the totalitarian and progre...
September 04, 2016 at 11:05
We both know this is laughably false, no intellectual would take your assertions seriously. Cite, for example, where Plato encourages barbarity, murde...
September 03, 2016 at 20:34
Motive. It depends from culture to culture and from person to person. Do you want the motive in today's world? Or 100 years ago, or when? If today, th...
September 03, 2016 at 19:29
The criminal is either mistaken about his purpose, or he thinks that robbing a bank is a means to achieve it. Purpose in my framework, which is Aristo...
September 03, 2016 at 18:57
I think the more important point that TWG was trying to make is whether or not humanism (whether of a religious or secular kind) is destructive. The w...
September 03, 2016 at 16:00
Leo Strauss is loved by neo-conservatives, not really by traditional conservatives. Eric Voegelin or Russell Kirk would be examples that are more frie...
September 03, 2016 at 14:00
Very well, I largely agree with this, although I have never thought of it that way, and always thought of myself as a humanist. What would you say abo...
September 03, 2016 at 10:42
Depends - conservatism generally and historically refers to social policy. Someone can be a conservative with a socialist view of economics, nothing c...
September 03, 2016 at 09:44
Yes! What do you take humanism to be, and why do you reject it? I highly agree. Very perceptive observations, I agree also here.
September 03, 2016 at 09:43
Yes, which is tragic. Interesting abstraction :D
September 03, 2016 at 09:30
Why so?
September 03, 2016 at 09:24
:-! That is your opinion, personally I think statistics give us insight into what is happening in society, especially when we look at how they're chan...
September 03, 2016 at 09:20
Divorce rate: 50%+ Out of wedlock birth rate: 40% (in some populations even higher 70% in blacks) Infidelity rate: 50% Family is becoming increasingly...
September 02, 2016 at 22:43
It is the purpose, whether someone is actually fulfilling it (or is aware it is the purpose, or wants to fulfil it) is a different story. Such as? Yes...
September 02, 2016 at 20:57
Probably you also found the local atmosphere to be more decent and welcoming than a large metropolitan college would have been Why do you think this h...
September 02, 2016 at 20:04
Maybe a theoretical difference, but I see no practical one... both tellings play exactly the same role.
September 02, 2016 at 19:45