You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Agustino

Comments

No, since atheism has no desire to experience God. A complete apophaticism represents a desire for God, but it doesn't work alone, it requires dogma. ...
July 10, 2017 at 20:39
@"Thorongil" Who wrote this?
July 10, 2017 at 20:19
I really thought you understood this from Schopenhauer. The categories of thought that apply to the phenomenon don't apply to the noumenon... If poor ...
July 10, 2017 at 20:08
I'm not sure I would affirm such a cataphatic statement about God :P - that presupposes for example that God has a nature, just like created things do...
July 10, 2017 at 20:06
Well one aspect of the conflict for example is displayed by the fact that Ivan uses arguments. This surprises Alyosha, because arguments for/against G...
July 10, 2017 at 20:03
>:O I wrote it to explain to you why Orthodoxy lacks autobiographical material with regards to mystics in comparison to the West. However, a theologia...
July 10, 2017 at 20:01
Sure but that's because God is the standard of good itself. The Lord gives and the Lord takes away, entirely out of His own accord. Why is it bad if H...
July 10, 2017 at 19:35
But did you understand it? Do you understand why Alyosha never gave Ivan a reply? Do you understand the West-East conflict that is playing out there? ...
July 10, 2017 at 19:24
Not at all, my moral argument from teleology holds that we all, as human beings, have the same telos, which is by no means "average", but quite the co...
July 10, 2017 at 18:01
And by the way Thorongil, you still haven't answered my question here.
July 10, 2017 at 17:34
I direct you towards this book.
July 10, 2017 at 17:21
Why do you think I wrote: ? No, dogmas are fixed statements, which don't necessarily use cataphatic language at all. They are however useful to practi...
July 10, 2017 at 17:20
No, your perspective is wrong. There is only one true perspective, and that is God's. Your notions of right and wrong are first of all corrupted by or...
July 10, 2017 at 17:02
You mean there are places in the Old Testament where sinners are punished and killed? Of course.
July 10, 2017 at 17:00
Let me ask you - is God free?
July 10, 2017 at 15:45
Those traditions are wrong. No as in God wouldn't do wrong. What is wrong for you to do isn't necessarily wrong for God to do - that's the difference ...
July 10, 2017 at 15:45
Nope. I haven't said God could beat you and torture you and that would be right.
July 10, 2017 at 14:14
Also please note that God depriving you of free will doesn't mean the same thing as me depriving you of free will. When I deprive you of free will, I ...
July 10, 2017 at 14:06
Nope. Creator has different rights than creatures. It would be wrong for a creature to deprive you of your free will, not for God. If it wasn't for Go...
July 10, 2017 at 14:05
No it doesn't sound like Descartes evil demon. But the standard of what's right and wrong changes. You keep talking about God committing wrong - that ...
July 10, 2017 at 13:49
Why is it wrong when God has created them from nothing and wields complete power over them, not having had to create them in the first place? Does God...
July 10, 2017 at 13:41
Why would it be? :s I see no necessary contradiction in God breaking the will of human beings. The only reason He does not break it, is because He doe...
July 10, 2017 at 13:34
Breaking the free will of his creatures is not logically impossible (like making 2+2=5 is, or creating a stone so heavy that he cannot lift, etc.). An...
July 10, 2017 at 13:24
Why? Nothing is impossible for God - theoretically. Practically God would not break his creature's free will - but He could do it theoretically.
July 10, 2017 at 08:26
Have you been reactivated by Crooked? The orders arrived in the mailbox or what happened? X-)
July 09, 2017 at 20:49
Really those passages aren't so hard to deal with, if you just had access to Apostolic Tradition under the guidance of the Church. The Bible was never...
July 09, 2017 at 19:54
God "hardens their hearts" by not breaking their free will. God could force them to believe in Him and thus be saved, but then He would break their fr...
July 09, 2017 at 19:38
What does God's grace have to do with their will? God has already fully revealed Himself to them, and they have rejected Him. Yes, they could realise ...
July 09, 2017 at 19:25
What would cause them to regret their actions? They already know everything there is to know. So there isn't anymore knowledge that they can have - so...
July 09, 2017 at 19:15
They cannot repent because what could cause them to repent? If in full knowledge of God they turn against Him, then what can cause them to repent? The...
July 09, 2017 at 18:50
sister* :P
July 09, 2017 at 12:16
>:O >:O >:O >:O Do you have your pink flying pony with you Wayfarer? :D A religion of one's own is precisely what a religion is not - a religion invol...
July 09, 2017 at 12:09
How do you know there isn't a reason? Just because God hasn't told it to you doesn't mean you can just infer its absence :s Theoretically, but practic...
July 09, 2017 at 11:59
Calvin was most likely a heretic with a profound misunderstanding of the Bible, who rejected the authority of the Apostolic tradition. :s you asked ab...
July 09, 2017 at 11:54
Sure, I perfectly agree with this. This is referencing people who are fully aware of God's Love, but who nevertheless reject it and turn away from it....
July 09, 2017 at 11:50
An Orthodox would say that apophatic theology can't exist without DOGMA, which is a bit different. Catholicism has more spiritual autobiographies and ...
July 09, 2017 at 10:47
This is false under a common reading that equivocates between the two uses of sacrifice. Orthodox believers are supposed to, in English terminology, s...
July 09, 2017 at 08:47
>:O >:O >:O Good that I see at least you removed your insults from this comment. No, it's not at all authoritative. The Moscow Patriarchate does not, ...
July 09, 2017 at 08:30
Do you like those walls of text? (L) Or are they too powerful for you?
July 08, 2017 at 20:52
I will answer your post tomorrow.
July 08, 2017 at 20:51
No, the moral of the story actually amounts to something different. That Job is puny and insignificant, and while he's yelling at God, he doesn't unde...
July 08, 2017 at 20:50
Thanks. I am aware of this largely, and I'd also class Aquinas as more of a Neo-platonist than an Aristotelian actually :P .
July 08, 2017 at 20:44
Cataphatic vs Apophatic. Like who? People like Dionysus? I know he does, but the Catholic Church largely doesn't interpret him that way. You should at...
July 08, 2017 at 20:42
I think it certainly thinks the way St. Thomas Aquinas used the neo-Platonic works was wrong at least in the case I will illustrate below. Yes, and I ...
July 08, 2017 at 20:25
Not necessarily, because love may be a basic metaphysical fact of the world, in which case it would not be designed, but it would simply be there. A d...
July 08, 2017 at 20:04
Indeed, I actually misread your sentence, my apologies. That's what happens when there's a lot to reply to :( lol
July 08, 2017 at 19:25
I view God's rebukes in the same light - he is rebuking people who think they know what they're talking about instead of being humble and admit to hum...
July 08, 2017 at 19:20
Well we've already gone over that, and I explained what the Unforgiveable Sin is, and also why it is unforgiveable. It is not because God will not for...
July 08, 2017 at 19:19
They are stupid, and they should be ashamed of themselves if you want to know the truth. They think they can know the mind of God :s Give me a break. ...
July 08, 2017 at 19:06
Which "fine print" are you talking about? :s
July 08, 2017 at 19:04