You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Noble Dust

Comments

By mechanics I just mean the physical workings of the brain, and this sort of thing: That's all, metaphorically, the mechanics of human experience. It...
August 18, 2017 at 03:39
It's actually Elijah, by Nicholas Roerich. He has his own museum in NYC. I visited and had the place to myself. I saw that one last, as it was on the ...
August 18, 2017 at 00:25
I guess what i mean is that as your tastes refine, you become pickier. For myself, it's harder and harder to enjoy generic indie bands that have a nic...
August 17, 2017 at 22:42
I don't have a problem with a given piece of intellectual content being beautiful, I just don't think beauty is inherently apprehended through the int...
August 17, 2017 at 22:25
The problem is that evolutionary science doesn't even address metaphysical or ontological questions, for instance, let alone aesthetic questions, as p...
August 17, 2017 at 22:15
I'm still having trouble seeing how beauty is intellectual.
August 17, 2017 at 22:01
What I was trying to point out is that a sense of being a part of something bigger is something science can only describe the mechanics of; it doesn't...
August 17, 2017 at 22:00
For clarity, are you still talking about beauty when you say "it requires a grasping"?
August 17, 2017 at 21:46
If the "something bigger" doesn't actually refer to anything and only serves to prolong life (why exactly?), then isn't that idea essentially a form o...
August 17, 2017 at 21:40
Isn't it also a fundamental aspect of that transcendence? I agree with everything else you said.
August 17, 2017 at 21:22
What I was saying is that the socio-economic pressure on art industries changes how the value of art is perceived, which means it doesn't play the sam...
August 17, 2017 at 21:18
Tragedy can be beautiful because it highlights the human condition; it highlights the gap between beliefs and desires versus reality. But that's beaut...
August 17, 2017 at 20:34
I agree to an extent, but again, I think it's even more complex than what you're saying. A large part of why there is such a large and ever-increasing...
August 17, 2017 at 19:25
*Takes a look at his computer wallpaper* : https://uploads1.wikiart.org/images/nicholas-roerich/elijah-the-prophet-1931.jpg
August 17, 2017 at 19:00
Well, they're certainly connected, but how do they become equivalent? What line of work made this your life's work btw? (edit: did you mean sales?) Wi...
August 17, 2017 at 18:49
He also said "Art has shown that universal expression can only be created by a real equation of the universal and the individual." :P http://theoria.a...
August 17, 2017 at 18:42
Hmmm, it could be too simplistic, but wouldn't the converse assumption also be too simplistic? Admittedly, we're making broad strokes here, and we're ...
August 17, 2017 at 18:33
Ok, no worries, sorry to misinterpret. Well, I work in retail, and we have to play music in the shop for 8 hours every day, 5 days a week. My boss yel...
August 17, 2017 at 17:44
You keep replacing "work matters" with "please others". They aren't the same. Again, I'm wondering, in general, do you think people want their work to...
August 17, 2017 at 17:38
On my phone, will respond to everybody soon.
August 17, 2017 at 17:01
Ok, but do you disagree that in general, people want their work to matter? Is it wrong for a professional artist to want their work to matter?
August 17, 2017 at 16:56
Are you suggesting "true" art (which you say is still very difficult to create) would be art that is less immersed in the artists culture? And I was n...
August 17, 2017 at 06:06
Sure. The quote from Mondrian does suggest that he was painting and developing his style before he was introduced to some of his main contemporaries. ...
August 17, 2017 at 05:57
I took your question as to whether it was my experience to be sarcastic, since none of us were alive in the time period I was referring to. I assumed ...
August 17, 2017 at 05:55
What I'm trying to point out is the quality of the experience of art in the internet age, vs. past ages. That was pretty explicit in my OP.
August 17, 2017 at 05:27
Do you disagree with the statement you quoted?
August 17, 2017 at 05:25
Do you disagree?
August 17, 2017 at 04:52
Everyone needs to feel like their work matters in some way. Someone endeavoring to become a full time artist wants to feel like their work matters, an...
August 17, 2017 at 04:30
Right, I remember the one at the University that my dad worked at. It seemed awesome. Libraries for literature have been around forever, which is grea...
August 17, 2017 at 04:25
Maybe you should just not read any more of his posts in this thread. >:O
August 16, 2017 at 21:42
:s What is with this "I won't be responding" thing these days? Is Thanatos/Harris really having that negative of an effect here?
August 16, 2017 at 21:18
Did you read the OP?
August 16, 2017 at 20:51
I agree.
August 16, 2017 at 20:30
So you don't think the ubiquity of art in the internet age changes anything about our consumption and experience of art? Sorry, you're right, it does.
August 16, 2017 at 20:17
True; wise words. I disagree; it's natural to want to share art. The audience is something like 50% of the work, in my estimation. Artists like myself...
August 16, 2017 at 20:15
But I'm arguing that the social and psychological pressures of a globalized world do affect our ability to be creative. The art world is still run by ...
August 16, 2017 at 15:23
How do you know that? How are you a person "irrespective of social class"? I didn't mean that; I was referring to "unapproachable contemporary classic...
August 16, 2017 at 15:20
Can you back this up? Atonality, the evolution of the whole tone scale, on the one hand, and the focus of the tonic and using only chords that relate ...
August 16, 2017 at 08:26
I disagree; the lines are more blurred but only because there's so much more art that exists in the middle somewhere. But unapproachable contemporary ...
August 16, 2017 at 07:42
Socially, they exist in two different worlds. But they absolutely influence one another. I'm still not sure how this relates to the questions I'm aski...
August 16, 2017 at 07:22
Right, so that's the difference between "folk" art and "high" art. Maybe it's an unfortunate distinction, but my OP here is essentially about high art...
August 16, 2017 at 07:14
Sure, can you enumerate further? I gave a few specific examples from personal accounts of people from those times. Maybe you can offer counter example...
August 16, 2017 at 06:57
It looks like you're missing the forest for the trees here, with regards to the questions I'm asking. I'm relating the state of the experience of art ...
August 16, 2017 at 06:51
In: Sexism  — view comment
This is exactly the problem. "Rules".
August 15, 2017 at 04:26
In: Sexism  — view comment
That's the irony of the world we live in. It's wrong for men to force those characteristics on women; but it's liberating for women to force those cha...
August 15, 2017 at 04:00
In: Sexism  — view comment
Do you disagree that women have lower testosterone levels?
August 15, 2017 at 03:49
In: Sexism  — view comment
This is a statement about his opinion on the state of submissiveness in the sexes. It's not specifically sexist. Same No mention of gender Vague; not ...
August 15, 2017 at 03:47
In: Sexism  — view comment
But yes, that is sexist, and I'm surprised to find that Agustino said that. but it's not a direct quote, so I would appreciate a proper quote so as to...
August 15, 2017 at 03:30
In: Sexism  — view comment
http://winefolly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/star-trek-face-palm-picard.jpg
August 15, 2017 at 03:03
But, like all of us, your username is now part and parcel to how we all perceive you. We don't perceive you as a bitter crank; it's rather that there'...
August 14, 2017 at 08:31