You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Richard B

Comments

To dissolve such a profound question, “how do we know what is real?” with such banality….but as Sraffa demonstrated, a common gesture can make one rec...
May 11, 2025 at 03:12
The word “real” serves us with a great function, it sets us up for a contrast that may help us navigate the world. For example, “That egg is real and ...
May 10, 2025 at 18:57
Thats good, at least we both believe solipsism is a untenable position.
May 10, 2025 at 17:08
Since you are asking "how we can know about the world even though "we don't see the world as it is", I will assume you could not keep yourself from sl...
May 09, 2025 at 21:51
Metaphysical theories like this are hopeless, no evidence can be presented to cure this mental disease, and only demands some sort of persuasion to cu...
May 08, 2025 at 15:41
The Cartesian theater and Plato's cave are very dark places, but if the occupants still have their sanity and astuteness, they may notice light emanat...
May 05, 2025 at 16:48
Private world, an interesting idea, a devise to have a conversation about something that is imagine but like a work of fiction, neither true or false....
May 04, 2025 at 23:19
Well, I know you taste food if you put it in your month and you say “that was good not too spicy” or I know when you don’t taste your food if you say ...
May 04, 2025 at 22:33
On "The Concept of the Ruliad", Stephen Wolfram's idea of the "entangled limit of everything that is computationally possible: the result of the follo...
May 04, 2025 at 01:46
[reply="tim wood;985774" Yep, it is a great discussion. But confusion begets confusion. Notice how Wolfram says to Hoffman you are an N of 1, as if th...
May 03, 2025 at 21:32
Wittgenstein’s beetle in the box rears its ugly head again. Not sure if Wolfram knows it but he presents this argument from a philosophy of science me...
May 03, 2025 at 19:56
I don't think earlier Wittgenstein would exactly go along with this line of thought. Consider these sections from Tractatus, “3.02. The thought contai...
May 02, 2025 at 01:29
Wow, that sounds pretty serious, if 2+2=4 is not a necessary truth a whole lot if stuff falls apart. What exactly do you have it mind? Maybe, for exam...
May 01, 2025 at 20:47
Just exploring this idea of “tense” and “affecting” logical form. I will stop my inquiry into this since this may take the conversation in a direction...
April 30, 2025 at 17:56
And you know this I presume a priori.
April 30, 2025 at 15:41
That form is unaffected by tense is impossible because “by virtue of form?” If so, does that really say anything at all?
April 29, 2025 at 23:04
Fascinating stuff
April 28, 2025 at 21:28
It would be nice to see a post on the tension between temporal possible world semantics and scientific determinism. Or maybe there was?
April 28, 2025 at 17:35
In: The Forms  — view comment
So, there are things that exist and things that do not exist. If those things do not exist, it might subsists. If it subsists, it is real. If it does ...
April 27, 2025 at 01:35
Indeed, and one should take seriously the point of the whole book. That is to distinguish between what has sense and what is nonsense, what can be sai...
April 26, 2025 at 15:13
I think these sections are serving the purpose of putting the implications of Wittgenstein view of language and how we make sense of the world, decidi...
April 26, 2025 at 02:50
To add a quote of a much forgotten book, Mill’s On Liberty, he analyzes in Chapter II Of the Liberty of Thought and Discussion, “We can never be sure ...
April 25, 2025 at 22:34
I think the beauty of a society that has this freedom is the transparency it can offer. You know where your fellow citizen stands and they know where ...
April 25, 2025 at 20:43
I know for a non-believer, yep. But for a believer, there is a rule given by the creator, and the creator decrees there is one eternal sin that cannot...
April 24, 2025 at 02:17
Well according to the Bible : Mark 3:28: "Truly, I say to you, all sins will be forgiven the sons of men, and whatever blasphemies they utter". Mark 3...
April 24, 2025 at 01:41
I think Wittgenstein’s Tractatus may offer a solution here. That is in order for us to make sense of the world, that is to avoid speaking non sense, o...
April 23, 2025 at 23:17
God should have hired David as his publicist, since he did such a better job of articulating the process of eternal damnation than the Bible, maybe th...
April 23, 2025 at 21:49
Quite a claim, that there is an illusion of transmission when we substantivizing information. If a l wrote a letter to my friend providing information...
April 14, 2025 at 02:46
Interesting criteria for choice, “it’s all just chemicals”. Well putting aside what goes on in your brain for a moment, are those “real objects” in fr...
April 09, 2025 at 16:13
Yep, this seems to be making a come back. When we all thought Hume buried the design argument, philosophers are starting to defend it again, see Chalm...
April 08, 2025 at 05:04
Yep, especially if notions of time and space come into existence and have sense emerging from the big bang. Thus, asking questions of “cause” may have...
March 28, 2025 at 18:03
I think even Einstein would say quantum mechanics is not fundamental given his famous quote, “God does not play dice.” Heisenberg may have even questi...
March 26, 2025 at 20:23
Lets explore this idea: You express the following thought to me, “A circle has four sides.” I may reply, “Not sure what you are thinking here, but a s...
March 24, 2025 at 17:43
Quine, in Word and Object, addresses how folk who are color blind use the word correctly. “Uniformity comes where it matters socially; hence rather in...
March 17, 2025 at 23:23
“But we do know who the question refers to…God. Yes, there more that one can learn about God, but that is still about God. Kripke’s point, that we do ...
February 05, 2025 at 06:27
Nice passage. Stuck this in Chat Smith to see if it confirms the veracity. And, there was no disagreement. But I guess this is expected based on what ...
January 12, 2025 at 03:30
Reaction to this post: Sometimes in philosophy we show by arranging our concepts into a persuasive paradigms. This is very different than presenting l...
January 01, 2025 at 01:13
Quine could generalize the general.
December 13, 2024 at 16:06
If I said “It is the case that it is raining outside”, I do not mention anything about “truth” Would we need to say “what is the case” is a property o...
December 08, 2024 at 19:19
“As against solipsism it is to be said, in the first place, that it is psychologically impossible to believe, and is rejected in fact even by those wh...
December 04, 2024 at 23:05
Nicely put. How about I know this is a hand because I am pointing to it, we both see it, and we both understand what I am talking about.
September 10, 2024 at 21:57
Moore's paper, "Proof of an External World”, is an appeal to common sense. His intuition tells him that a philosophical analysis arriving at a radical...
September 09, 2024 at 04:20
I like to provide a brief defense of Moore's Proof of an External World. I don't claim Moore would agree of my defense, but let's just say I use Moore...
September 06, 2024 at 02:54
I would say something else as well. A human community who has a general consensus in color judgment. Without this general consensus, there is no langu...
August 31, 2024 at 23:02
I find Gellner is more complaining than arguing in this book. Ordinary language philosophers are like the parent telling the child you can’t just do a...
August 31, 2024 at 22:48
Yep, is “color in a perceiver”? Well, sure if you open the skull to see the brain, it may appear grayish. But I suspect they are saying something rath...
August 31, 2024 at 18:44
Science studies stuff like brains, nerves, cells, molecules, etc… Not sensations and mental percepts. But scientists certainly are free to talk about ...
August 31, 2024 at 18:09
Feel free to keep your grammatical fiction, it may serve you well.
August 31, 2024 at 17:19