Jeremiah

I never claimed you claimed it was universal. I am pointing out the fact that nothing has meaning because you decided it does not have meaning. You co...

Yet, it is you who decided what is "reliable". If you are going to say nothing has meaning let's be consistent here.

Change your relative scope. It is an absolutely meaningless scope that has no real foundation, no actual purpose and it does not really exist. You pul...

Let just say there is an actual Creator. Who do you think will find it first, science or religion?

You are talking about a mathematical abstract as if it were real, you need to learn the difference. A logical proof will only show it in the abstract,...

So what makes a theologian such an expert? All they do is study human imagination.

You do need to learn how to read, as you have missed my point since the very start, and you still clearly don't get it. I am saying this statement her...

Feel free to actually address it.

I have never seen an infinte number of prime numbers, have you?

It is more rational to realize your limits, accept that of such things you are clueless and conclude nothing.

As far as I can tell nothing I have ever observered has had a start.

Pick a book you wish to read and understand. Start reading that book, when you come across a reference to an unfamiliar work or concept, stop reading ...

I like the disclaimer at the bottom, as it shows that I got to you. It also displays a flare of egotism, since you are worried others might see your s...

Ya, I have heard your lame excuses.

You are dodging. The idea that a few lines in a dictionary is sufficient to cover a vast subject of something like religious faith, is stupid.

And so this is how it goes, on the religious side there is never any evidence, just a bunch of talk, while scientist continue to crank out mountains o...

If someone can't even put their own argument forward then this tells me that they don't even have confidence in their own position.

I have not called you any names. You have accused me of name-calling, but it not actually something I have done; however, I do recall you calling me a...

We are not talking about a word. We are talking a multicultural theological and philosophical concept and if you think a brief colloquial summary in a...

It is a mathematical science, so science is the other half of that. Statisticians are trained in things like experiment design, sampling methods, mode...

There is a reason statistics is employed on such a large scale in the modern world, because, when done correctly, it works. What you should be doing i...

That link does not say statistics contains logical fallacies, it says the misuse of statistics is a statistical fallacy. That makes no sense at all. Y...

Statistics is not just math, that's a common misconception.

Anyone who thinks religion and science don't mix, should study the history on the theory of special creation vs species transmutation, Isaac Newton an...

I think you are making a lot of false assumptions about me. I never said it is all about science and I never said science is without limits. Those are...

I have written on a sheet of paper 100 different versions of a flying pink elephant. Until you address and disprove all 100 version this is proof flyi...

I don't care what you believe. Feel free to think whatever you want; however, that is not going to stop me from expressing what I think about those be...

Well let's see, it has be how many thousands of year? And not a single thread of evidence of god(s)? At some point you just have to let go.

God damn you really need to learn how to read.

Let me sum up this entire thread: An argument on who gets to say what about an imaginary being.

If the standard for not being an authority on God is not being able to disprove God then no one is an authority on God.

Let me make this clear, I think atheist and theist are both equally full of nonsense.

You are absolutely demanding proof of the non-existence. I quoted you doing it right in that post, it has been your entire argument this whole thread....

And yet, despite your claim of an education, you keep demanding proof of this non-existence; showing how little you actually understand the scientific...

It seems you are just chucked full baseless assumptions.

Just lay your argument down and supply your evidence. Stop beating around the bush and just give us your proof, as would be the standard in any other ...

They would have to see it the way I do and then take the leap of faith, never losing that unshakable doubt while holding belife. There is faith and th...

Here is a crazy idea: Could it be that there is no evidence because it is not real? I think there is a very strong possibility of that.

All I am hearing is more talk. Where is the evidence?

When discussing something as philosophically deep as faith, a dictionary definition is going to fall massively short.

A dictionary is no authority in such matters. Talk about not understanding limits.

I have made several valid arguments against your silly position.

I many plenty of arguments, clearly ones you didn't understand.

I got tons of opinions if you want more.

People who need their belief in God to be rational are people who lack faith.

I ripped it off from Soren Kierkegaard.

To be honest, I have only met one person which I think may have had genuine faith, he both recognized the absurdity of the belief and believed at the ...

If one finds theism reasonable then they don't need faith to believe, they have reason. Genuine faith is believing when you know it is unreasonable to...

The only thing believers ever bring is silly word games. There is a very good reason for that, because it is the only thing they have. Cut the BS and ...

That is a nonsense argument. Semantic goalpost shifting.