On statistics and appeal to authority fallacy in debate
Statistics is commonly use as a tool in debate. It could be use to attack other argument or to defend an argument.
There are some contradictory quote about statistics itself:
Quoting Noah Mengisteab & Barry Corcoran
Quoting BBC Editorial Guidelines
So, I try to make my own conclusion about whether a statistics is entirely pure from logical fallacy or not when someone use statistics in debate and produced this:
Even after I produced that conclusion, some question still arise:
Is appeal to authority fallacy in debate itself arise from standardization of science by scientific method? Or could it arise from public ethical concern toward authority? Or could it arise from Machiavellianism?
There are some contradictory quote about statistics itself:
Quoting Noah Mengisteab & Barry Corcoran
Data is a product of research. It’s not a random number that falls from the debate gods for you to use to win a round.
Quoting BBC Editorial Guidelines
The UK Statistics Authority has the statutory role to safeguard and promote the production and publication of Official Statistics.
So, I try to make my own conclusion about whether a statistics is entirely pure from logical fallacy or not when someone use statistics in debate and produced this:
Statistics sometimes contain logical fallacy. It is exist due to widespread of scientific method usage which exist as an indirect form of appeal to authority fallacy.
Even after I produced that conclusion, some question still arise:
Is appeal to authority fallacy in debate itself arise from standardization of science by scientific method? Or could it arise from public ethical concern toward authority? Or could it arise from Machiavellianism?
Comments (6)
Statistics is not just math, that's a common misconception.
That link does not say statistics contains logical fallacies, it says the misuse of statistics is a statistical fallacy.
That makes no sense at all. You have to explain everything in science and back up everything with evidence. So how could it have an appeal to authority fallacy?
The fallacies you listed are things people do, they are not inherit in the methods.