You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Brett

Comments

By art?
January 21, 2020 at 04:31
They have no art, they purchase it. Edit: however it’s still real and reflects them.
January 21, 2020 at 04:30
All this is to back up part of my position that art is like the ripples from a stone tossed into a pond.
January 21, 2020 at 04:23
So by that point it was no longer genuine, and in fact may have already been commercialised and made irrelevant in the UK. Generally, I feel, by the t...
January 21, 2020 at 04:20
So would it be fair to say that art is almost an instantaneous artefact of a particular emerging culture, small or large.
January 21, 2020 at 04:17
Yes, and it was very imitative. So it didn’t really have the same roots or legitimacy as the UK or US. So like so much art it wasn’t a genuine reflect...
January 21, 2020 at 04:08
Yes, because there was a vast working class, unemployed, disenfranchised, angry culture that existed, had their own cultural references and felt its r...
January 21, 2020 at 04:05
What I meant was that their artwork is unconsciously formed by the temper of the times, which is cultural. I can’t imagine what else I could call the ...
January 21, 2020 at 04:00
I think there’s something there, because I believe that only humans produce art.
January 21, 2020 at 03:51
Obviously from my posts I don’t go along with that. Artists don’t create culture and culture doesn’t allow itself to be changed by anybody. If art cha...
January 21, 2020 at 03:50
My feeling is that art once held a vital part in man’s perception of the world, possibly beginning with the Lascaux cave drawings. In early tribal com...
January 21, 2020 at 03:44
I think it might be closer to the truth that artists, major game players, smashed definitions but never owned them.
January 21, 2020 at 03:37
I’ll have another go at this.
January 21, 2020 at 03:34
I don’t think that’s really a definition of anything. If you used that to explain art you’d have nothing. When artists talk about art they generally t...
January 21, 2020 at 03:33
That’s not very sporting of you @"Bartricks".
January 21, 2020 at 00:57
Oh, okay. I thought that was in reference to art movements and not art itself. My mistake.
January 21, 2020 at 00:56
And why is that false?
January 21, 2020 at 00:52
I’m interested to hear why it’s false and “ a bit gibberishly”.
January 21, 2020 at 00:51
Definitions are created by owners, not artists.
January 21, 2020 at 00:36
Art.
January 21, 2020 at 00:34
Of course. But they themselves and their ability to project reflect instantaneously their time, which can only be cultural. Post WWll art reflected th...
January 21, 2020 at 00:34
Art is a cultural mirror. Unconsciously or consciously it reflects, absolutely the state of the culture it springs from. When the trains of New York C...
January 21, 2020 at 00:22
@"Zelebg" is right, colour does not exist, only light.
January 19, 2020 at 10:02
Intolerance. The OP is the roots of racism.
January 18, 2020 at 09:33
I’ve had this many times, to the point where I begin to wonder if I’m making any sense at all. I’m never that positive I’m right anyway, but if someon...
January 18, 2020 at 05:03
Well I think you need to first decide what your primary objective might be. Then you decide how to reach it. Opening borders based on a moral position...
January 16, 2020 at 04:29
I think you’re coming from an ideological position here which I cannot challenge.
January 16, 2020 at 04:18
Thank you.
January 16, 2020 at 04:16
And it doesn’t need words to be what it is.
January 16, 2020 at 04:10
Do you mean “man” or “male”?
January 16, 2020 at 04:10
Why?
January 16, 2020 at 04:08
Yes and nature came before language. Words are an effort to categorise, but they’re not the thing. I’m sure there a more efficient argument than that ...
January 16, 2020 at 04:06
I know you think that and I don’t.
January 16, 2020 at 04:01
Best outcomes for South Africa was an end to apartheid. Best outcomes for women was getting the vote. Best outcomes for gays was legal marriage. Very ...
January 16, 2020 at 03:59
That’s because there is and nature has decreed it. However, if you now want to say that mind determines sex, and not nature, then go for it. People ca...
January 16, 2020 at 03:55
With “the right decision” I’m meaning the decision that leads to best outcomes. Is a moral position the best way to make a decision on, for example, o...
January 16, 2020 at 03:49
:up:
January 16, 2020 at 03:08
So if someone lacked them but still felt they were a complete women then doesn’t this suggest that being a woman on that basis is a state of mind. Of ...
January 16, 2020 at 03:06
From what you say though, as it seems to me, boobs and vagina are essential, and if you don’t have them then you’re not a complete woman.
January 16, 2020 at 02:53
I’m guessing you mean you have an idea, a concept, of what a woman should look like, not in terms of beauty, but in terms of physical characteristics ...
January 16, 2020 at 02:47
That’s fine. So you agree that mind now determines sex, not chromosomes or nature.
January 16, 2020 at 02:39
But presumably you have not changed your chromosomes. You have changed your sex if it’s true that nature no longer determines sex but that the mind de...
January 16, 2020 at 02:20
I was thinking about how issues like the vote for women, black votes and gay marriage had been debated for some time before it happened, even if we ma...
January 16, 2020 at 01:52
It’s a pretty obscure idea as it stands.
January 16, 2020 at 01:20
I can’t make sense of that. Nor am I trying to define morality. What I’m trying to work out is whether open borders should be determined by a moral po...
January 16, 2020 at 01:15
Ignoring the possible consequences seems immoral. That’s why I wonder if it’s an idealistic position that cloaks itself in morality. Idealism rushes f...
January 16, 2020 at 00:40
Or is this just idealism driving morality?
January 16, 2020 at 00:01
That seems to be more a matter of ethics to me.
January 15, 2020 at 23:37
My OP is based on those who support open borders and hold a moral position on the subject. So the debate is not over whether morals exist, an interest...
January 15, 2020 at 23:34
In the demand for open borders I’m looking at in terms of being a moral position. So far I haven’t heard any particular objective coming from proponen...
January 15, 2020 at 23:31