You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Streetlight

Comments

But the measure of psi is still not 'intrinsic' to the notion of pressure gradient; it still a digital model of the analog; this has nothing to do wit...
September 03, 2016 at 04:51
As usual, we stand imperceptibly close on some issues, and unbridgeably far on others. While I agree with the thrust of your post, you continue to hol...
September 03, 2016 at 03:12
Actually, the issues around the question of boundary setting are quite important and worth pursuing in some detail. Recall that to institute any digit...
September 02, 2016 at 13:52
A delicate project indeed. Part of the motivation for this thread was to wonder if, within formal logic, there are resources by which to deal with the...
September 02, 2016 at 06:31
But there's no 'dark art' here: in order to digitize an analog continuum, you simply draw a boundary - and then you treat it as such. The cut is a sem...
September 02, 2016 at 02:17
Yeah, exactly. I said elsewhere in the thread that got this train of thought going that what I'm kind of after is something like a "critique of pure f...
September 01, 2016 at 17:56
Yeah, I was admittedly a little naughty in naming the thread. It was originally something like 'negation and the analog/digital distinction' but that ...
September 01, 2016 at 14:47
So you think degrees on a temperature scale are ordinal then?
September 01, 2016 at 11:33
Oh come on, you were talking about numbers in the context of a metric, numerical scale which is what I was responding to. Talk about shifting goalpost...
September 01, 2016 at 11:23
And what exactly do you think ordinal numbers indicate? Distinctions between discrete elements in a set? Not at all. What they mark are relationships,...
September 01, 2016 at 11:13
As I said above, the analog is not at all anything like a 'thing-in-itself'. It is eminently knowable in the most trivial of ways; it's just that unli...
September 01, 2016 at 11:06
If you can make a distinction between discrete elements in a system, then you're dealing with a digital system. If you can't, you're dealing with an a...
September 01, 2016 at 10:32
Um, I don't know what to say other than you're simply wrong. That one can find a number between any two numbers still means you're effecting a distinc...
September 01, 2016 at 10:17
But that is not perfectly analog at all. If you've got a numerical scale, you're already operating digitally. The only way to speak of differences in ...
September 01, 2016 at 09:18
How could it? Again, the paradigm is the mercury in the thermometer - what even would negative mercury mean? To speak as such already implies a digiti...
September 01, 2016 at 09:00
DNA as a brute molecule is neither analog nor digital - it is a not a system or a process - but the process of genetic expression (DNA to protein) is ...
September 01, 2016 at 02:21
Part of my argument here is that what you refer to as material identity is a kind of hypostatization or transcendental illusion in which 'numerical' (...
September 01, 2016 at 01:58
http://www.hxchector.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/senpai-noticed-me2.jpg
September 01, 2016 at 00:15
I dunno; on first brush I'd say the Sorites Paradox is a kind of symptom of what happens when you try to completely model an analog system in a digita...
September 01, 2016 at 00:10
Sounds relatively OK to me. I'd definitely affirm that language is a digital system (although not all digital systems are linguistic, and if I were to...
September 01, 2016 at 00:02
Nah, I wouldn't say that the digital is 'artificial'. Wilden himself will provide a few examples of digital systems in nature (he spends alot of time ...
August 31, 2016 at 16:56
No, the the digital is a subset of the analog, they are not in opposition or in a relation of exclusion. The relation is not a?d (XOR), rather, d?a. W...
August 31, 2016 at 16:27
Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari - What Is Philosophy? Jeffrey A. Bell - Deleuze and Guattari's What is Philosophy?: A Critical Introduction and Guid...
August 31, 2016 at 14:51
This is a spin-off of a discussion I was having in the Dennett thread; there was too much I wanted to pack in a post, so I figured I'd give it a threa...
August 31, 2016 at 14:44
(1) People don't say a thing is identical to itself in ordinary speech . (2) To say that a thing is identical to itself is nonsensical.
August 31, 2016 at 10:28
Ugh, I missed the qualification of 'probably' that I had meant to attach to that (I did the second time I mentioned in it my post!). Not that it matte...
August 31, 2016 at 09:36
Fair point. I should have said something to learn identity is to at least learn a fact about linguistic use, etc. In any case, the point is to resolve...
August 31, 2016 at 09:30
But you don't 'just' mean that 'they are the same guy'; you 'also mean' that they will respond to the same name, that Mr. Jones is responsible for the...
August 31, 2016 at 09:20
(I take) Wittgenstein's comment to apply to statements of identity that do not refer to an identity parameter. And it is the case the those sorts of c...
August 31, 2016 at 08:47
I don't know, give me a context of use. These things can't be talked about in abstraction - which is the point. This simply strikes me as a kind of tr...
August 31, 2016 at 08:35
No, no, it's not that people don't assert identity. Of course they do, they do so all the time. But the question isn't about assertion it's about onto...
August 31, 2016 at 08:17
Hmm, I don't think that saying Mr. Jones is Adam is the same as saying 'x is identical to itself'. It's the difference between x=x and x=y. One might ...
August 31, 2016 at 07:57
Perhaps one thing to recognize is that the term 'image of thought' in Deleuze is not just an arbitrary poetic term, but a technical one; In Difference...
August 31, 2016 at 06:41
Heh, the irony of course is that Deleuze's work is so absurdly technical that you kinda need a decent grasp of exactly that history to really understa...
August 31, 2016 at 05:53
I'll have to do some extended reading on this to give a proper reply; what I'm getting from this is that I need to focus on the notion of truth at pla...
August 31, 2016 at 05:48
Basically anything that abides by the law of identity ("a thing is equal to itself"). To be absolutely clear, to deny the law of identity isn't - for ...
August 30, 2016 at 12:54
No, you're right, I need to explain my reservations better. Basically I've always wondered this: how does formal logic deal with individuation? I woul...
August 29, 2016 at 13:49
I tend to find what little I read of analytic metaphysics more or less incomprehensible to me. I don't say this as a value judgement on my part, I jus...
August 29, 2016 at 11:41
Check out Vox's article on the movement, which is pretty comprehensive: http://www.vox.com/2016/4/18/11434098/alt-right-explained. "The label blends t...
August 29, 2016 at 05:06
I see what you did thar
August 28, 2016 at 05:40
"The first principle of philosophy is that Universals explain nothing but must themselves be explained" - Deleuze and Guattari, What Is Philosophy?
August 28, 2016 at 03:38
You mistake me - I didn't say that 'the world is unintelligible'; I said that it may well be the case that something as abstract as 'the world' doesn'...
August 25, 2016 at 13:18
There are two ways to look at the question of the world's intelligibility. The first is to ask about 'the world', how it works, its structure, etc, et...
August 25, 2016 at 02:54
Karen Barad - Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning (rereading) Vicki Kirby - Quantum Anthropologie...
August 23, 2016 at 17:32
Bahaha, douchebag. But you're wrong to boot: I still take the inferential constraints required by modelling to be particularizations of a more general...
August 19, 2016 at 06:40
We self-move; as biological creatures, we self-relate; we not only sustain ourselves metabolically, we seek ways to sustain that metabolism; movement ...
August 19, 2016 at 02:46
Again, you keep charging me with 'opposing' this, that or the other; 'naked aeshtetics' vs, 'social construction', 'inwardness' and 'outwordness'; the...
August 19, 2016 at 01:38
We can try this on for size: sensation is the qualitiy of/for a certain kind of existence. Part of what motivates many of the criteria I stipulate is ...
August 19, 2016 at 01:21
I think the point is more that on can imagine, at least in principle, explaining say, algebra to a disembodied being (assuming which we could get roun...
August 18, 2016 at 15:11
Not at all; I listed some quite specific conditions that need to be met for anything of the kind to occur: spatio-temporal and bodily differentiation,...
August 18, 2016 at 14:30