You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Streetlight

Comments

I don't think those sorts of objections are worth much. They arise from a lack of understanding, and a failure to appreciate the conceptual work that ...
September 27, 2017 at 02:15
To be clear again, what I'm speaking of is multiple ways of talking about multiple things which just so happened to be named 'being'. Not according to...
September 26, 2017 at 13:01
Depends what you mean by pluralism of course! Perhaps I can put it this way: different conceptions of 'existence/being/etc' ought to shed light on dif...
September 26, 2017 at 08:39
Heh, this is the $64 million (trillion?) dollar question isn't it? As far as I know, there's no real consensus on this, but I'm very partial to the vi...
September 26, 2017 at 07:38
But the truth of what, exactly? If two differing conceptions of existence are talking about two different things, then there's no real incommensuribil...
September 26, 2017 at 07:15
I think it's best not to approach these terms with any pre-set meaning, as it were. Generally, their significance changes depending on what one is try...
September 26, 2017 at 06:08
My Fox Keller books haven't arrived yet : ( So, before those - Catherine Malabou - Before Tomorrow: Epigenesis and Rationality Catherine Malabou - Cha...
September 26, 2017 at 05:43
Perhaps one way to approach this - and this is my inclination anyway - is to give up on thinking of legitimacy in absolute terms. I'd suggest in fact ...
September 25, 2017 at 08:51
To be clear, if I focus on economic considerations it's because it's just so happened to be that the changes I'm trying to track (Re: risk, time, and ...
September 25, 2017 at 07:34
Ahh, yes, I do now: It's that you're unfamiliar with the grade school rhetorical trope of topic sentences. Here is a guide from grammar girl that will...
September 25, 2017 at 07:17
Health insurance is an interesting site of analysis because while it definitely contributes to the intensification of the individual, as you put it, i...
September 25, 2017 at 06:40
You didn't answer my question. You were talking about spiritual purpose before, now you're talking about creativity in nature. I didn't ask you about ...
September 24, 2017 at 14:29
When Mr. Apo - "symmetry" "constraint" "triadic" - Krisis accuses you of jargon mongering. You couldn't make this up if you tried.
September 24, 2017 at 12:54
Except the GFC was caused precisely by investment into assets that were not revenue generating (housing), and speculative finance - derivative trading...
September 24, 2017 at 12:07
Yep, I wrote that in a paragraph about the changing temporal relations of risk, and how that legitimises legislation like that. But sure, yeah, read t...
September 24, 2017 at 11:12
Except at no point did I suggest anything about 'fostering a sense of crisis'. So just one example of how you're a bit slow on the dot connecting fron...
September 24, 2017 at 09:57
A bit late of a reply, but I actually have very little problem with that kind of spiritual understanding of life. Power to you if you want to believe ...
September 24, 2017 at 05:29
You should actually check out the video that @"cavacava" posted above by Reiner Forst. Forst has written extensively about questions of legitimacy and...
September 24, 2017 at 04:49
But the argument is not so much that life itself becomes a commodity but that it has been co-opted into circuits of speculative finance. It's the form...
September 24, 2017 at 03:29
Nothing.
September 24, 2017 at 03:18
It isn't.
September 24, 2017 at 02:19
George Williams and Daniel Reynolds - A Charter of Rights For Australia Evelyn Fox Keller - Making Sense of Life: Explaining Biological Development wi...
September 23, 2017 at 01:01
Regardless of the specifics, the point was simply to mark a line of bifurcation or divergence between Plato on the one hand, and Thucydides, Pericles,...
September 22, 2017 at 11:39
Also, re: Machiavelli and Thrasymachus: one thing that is often forgotten is that Machiavelli was not, himself, 'Machiavellian' in the sense of simply...
September 22, 2017 at 07:24
Ahhh you're in for a treat : D. And I know Kymlicka's text - it's an undergrad standard - and you'd definitely come away with the impression that you ...
September 22, 2017 at 07:00
The most basic source, now that I think about it, would be Machiavelli, who wisely counseled that one of the principal lessons the Prince ought to lea...
September 21, 2017 at 12:04
Heh, you're not alone in this concern. Raymond Geuss, among other others, has basically made his career out of criticizing what he calls 'ethics first...
September 21, 2017 at 11:23
I appreciate your reply, but will note that the quotations are only part of larger readings which make their cases in more detail. I quoted them simpl...
September 21, 2017 at 10:10
You misunderstand: it's not so much that this this is a 'central issue' so much as that it marks the crossing of a threshold that was previously uncro...
September 21, 2017 at 08:11
I'm super, super hesitant to concede that there is anything like a singular 'common sense' to begin with that Heidegger's views would align with. In f...
September 21, 2017 at 07:40
On middle class income growth: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/us-middle-class-incomes-reached-highest-ever-level-in-2016-census-burea...
September 21, 2017 at 06:24
Yeah, this is very true: debt isn't in and of itself a problem, but it matters when placed in the context of a whole host of other developments. Speci...
September 21, 2017 at 05:56
Here is a ditty I wrote on Heidegger a while back in response to a question (about the difference between the ontic and the ontological in Heidegger),...
September 21, 2017 at 04:47
Heh, I think you've misdiagnosed Wayfarer here: the problem is not one of accepting or not accepting one or another variety of cause - its to do with ...
September 21, 2017 at 03:08
If you're interested, there was a recently published collection - Reading Heidegger's Black Notebooks 1931–1941 - prompted by the recent publication o...
September 21, 2017 at 01:35
Just wanted to pick back up on this comment as well. I agree that this much of what is described here is not necessarily new - one thinks of Marx's co...
September 21, 2017 at 01:21
Not only do emotions influence your decision making, but you are incapable of making decisions in the absence of emotions. Check out the work of Anton...
September 20, 2017 at 17:20
Man, if we could answer this...; in truth I have no idea. Again, I'm very much in 'diagnosis' mode right now, trying to tease out the effects these de...
September 20, 2017 at 16:53
But this is exactly where indistinction matters: because health is no longer conceived in a purely negative sense - the absence of disease, or as "the...
September 20, 2017 at 16:45
Part of what's at stake in my post is the attempt to move away from 'psycologizing' explanations: things like saying 'ah, if only people would change ...
September 20, 2017 at 15:38
Will reply in full in a bit - I'm on a bus - but yes, this entire line of thought is massively influenced by the state of exception arguments. The spe...
September 20, 2017 at 12:47
The problem is not inequality per se, but the differences in growth. In the US case, numbers released the other day show that between 2008 and 2016, g...
September 20, 2017 at 11:35
Nope. If you study the sociology of the changes, they are most certainly not a 'function of human nature'. they are the result of very specific policy...
September 20, 2017 at 11:26
Fair question, I was a pretty brisk there. Basically I mean that there's been a change such that health is less and less understood in terms of the bi...
September 20, 2017 at 11:23
Not at all. Which is not to say I'm ruling 'slow' action out. I'm just not ruling radical action out either. One imagines it depends on the situation ...
September 20, 2017 at 09:54
No idea. I'm still in 'mapping' mode as it were, trying to make sense of where we stand. There's alot here that needs to be filled in, corroborated, a...
September 20, 2017 at 09:22
It means you've brought a particular post to the attention of the mod/admin team for review. No biggie.
September 18, 2017 at 04:35
There's nothing to discuss with anyone who consistently puts into question not what I say, but the (apparent, projected) reasons for my saying things ...
September 17, 2017 at 17:41
Aug, I'd suggest you'd not mistake my general indifference to your posts as 'begrudging acceptance'. Some arguments and people are simply beneath enga...
September 17, 2017 at 12:33
Short answer: no. We deleted a thread just the other day for doing just that. Even a question can be elaborated upon: the stakes upon which it turns, ...
September 16, 2017 at 18:23