CaZaNOx

In a sense you are not realy giving a counter to what I said. Im curious. If we assume gods exist and have knowledge of their reality, dreamworld and ...

Let me first clarify. When I speak of Vectorspace I do not mean the stric mathematical definition. Because else I would need to show the mathematical ...

you are diverting and it's irrelevant. To be able to tell if two "realities" are part of one bigger reality or uncombinable but not mutually exclusive...

I am not taking any road. The fact that it's rather easy to combine things on an abstract theoretical level is a basic counterargument to your positio...

I don't know if you are intentionaly missreading me. You asked what the counterargument to a position that you made up yourself is. But you didn't sta...

No thats not what I said. I am not proposing anything, at all. You said: So you asked us to construct a counter argument to a position you made up you...

I'll try to answer your question in a different way the the previous replies. What onthology basically is, is a framework to conceptualize content. In...

I disagree. If we keep the exact same initial conditions A will always produce the same result unlike B that will produce differenig results due to it...

In my understanding you are somehow missing certain points. For quantum events as far as I am informed they are understood to be probabilistic in natu...

I did enjoy writing it. What are you having in mind when you say: ?

Philosophy is the thing outside or on existing borders of "usefull" categories/views. Philosophy tries to enable the expaning of borders or creating o...

I assume so. As you put it (I hope I am not missinterpreting here) the nature of the question is binary. Since it is put as EITHER OR (exclusive or). ...

Why can he just assume incoherence of his reasoning process or axioms or words used. Or why can't we conceptualize the solipsist simply as having expi...

I am struggling with the remarks especially in your first response. Not with the content but with the relevance to the issue at hand. I first want to ...

I don't see why there wouldn't be the same problems with a binary notion of certainty. I further don't see why there should be nothing to doubt or wha...

I disagree despite not being a solipsist. I accept 1). 2) The question here is what is "knowledge". I assumed it to be something along the lines of "t...

I don't know how relevant my point is but maybe it's worth noting. I just don't see a paradox. I think this has been pointed out already to a degree. ...

I don't see to much validity in his general point at all. To preface my point: I am not a mathematician nor a physicist. Therefore I don't doubt the v...

In my view metaphysics is best understood as the basic framework one uses. It therefore is a necessity for any worldview. It doesn't really matter if ...

I would add language to the list. I think this is usually done by power what ever form it takes. However I don't think there's a proper way with the n...

Cardinality is the generalization that allows that the concept of "ammount of elements" can be made to include infinite Sets as well. It basically got...

Just to get it strait. Are you saying that something that repeats (forever without stopping) is not infinite? (Correct me if I misunderstood you) How ...

Agreed on that. Disagree. I gave the example of the natural Numbers a countable infinite set. I am not objecting that finite sets are countable. I am ...

Btw: I forgot to mention that I am actually really interested in your honest opinion about change and infinity and if possible why you have those opin...

Repeating creates infinity if it never stops. The nothing anyone has to worry about is just deflecting that this is the issue that we are discussing h...

I am arguing that change is an infinite property of the universe. I would say it's continuous since the idea of turning off and on change (figurativel...

What about change. The universe is undergoing change so every description is limited and smaller then the universe plus the next instance of change

Idon't think thats the israelis core argument. It rather is a counter argument/response to the palestinian argument. The Israeli main argument was bor...

I am aware that you can classify infinite sets via cardinal numbers. However calling them numbers seems to me a bit of a stretch. Like I would maybe s...

What do you think of this: 1. Assume N+ is infinite. 2. If defined recursivly (with Start n_1=1 and n_x=n_(x-1) + 1), N is expanding. 3. Implying N is...

unfortunatley this seems to be the case for some posts here. But yeah it is how it is. Afterall you don't have to reply.

I don't intend to be mean but what you are doing is inherently wrong and shows a lack of understanding of the concepts of logic. 1) A is not a premis....

She disobeyed the angle, not god. How is changing it later justified, isn't this basically stating that god said it wrong? Did gods word change? Isn't...

What exactly was the sin she committed in your view? Associating? I agree to the first half but not to the second. Anyhow I would agree with the OP th...

What about Sodom and Gomorrah? God specifies the number 10(why 10). If one can find 10 righteous people(I don't know if this only applies to adults/ma...

This should be obvious but just in case you are writing it as assignment for university, the most credible reference would be your Prof. or Assistant....

What form of government are you having in mind? I think it is a spectrum for both terms so it highly depends who you are referring to and the situatio...

How do you understand imagine in this context? Being able to visually represent it? Why does "imagining" it as logical theoretical option not count? W...

I added english to my spell check. Thank you for the tip

Fair point to a certain degree. I interpreted it to be written between the lines but if you say that wasn't the case I am willing to believe you and a...

Is there any missunderstanding left or did the replies answer your questions to a sufficient degree? Btw: I forgot to mention in my last reply that th...

How is this projecting? I described what the function of a strawmen is. (In the part you quotet). I am in no way flawless far from it. So if you spot ...

Oh yes I forgot my point would not be that they are not subdomains and rather that the subdomains should be the determing factors for topics that are ...

So is there anything that doesn't fall into a subdomain of Philosophy? And are all sciences subdomains of philosophy? You don't address the point of y...

Nice strawmen. Are you trolling or what's the matter with you, anyway your response could be added to my list or be understood as not much effort. You...

I mostly feel that the level of discussion is not statisfactory. That people put few effort in, and that it's not really philosophy we are discussing....

I don't know where you are getting the "sound deductive arguments" are "necessarily true" from. As you pointed out soundness uses synthetic propositio...

Ok I think the issue is resolved with the clarification you provided. However I'll try to explain why I used "only" so it gets clear for your aswell w...

I was refering to the difference between deism and theism. I would argue that theism in contrast to deism also requires god to be active after the act...

Fair point to a certain degree. In a "classical" debate regarding correctness I would agree. I still find it stunning that it is so hard to address th...