You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

unenlightened

Comments

The topic is mental illness diagnosis, if you care to look, and I am fairly confident that that is part of clinical psychology. So kindly do not berat...
May 12, 2017 at 16:42
By focusing on a term that you yourself introduced, you avoid any serious response. By focusing on clinical psychology, everything else is being ignor...
May 12, 2017 at 16:06
They have limits. The whole notion of 'mental phenomena' is rather confused; are your posts physical phenomena or mental phenomena? I'm not sure what ...
May 12, 2017 at 14:01
Science is very successful when directed outwards to the world of objects. But directed inwards at the subject that is (or isn't) scientific, it fails...
May 12, 2017 at 11:50
On a Thursday, some men come to the house and empty my bin. They generally take everything in the bin, and leave nothing. They don't, fortunately, hav...
May 12, 2017 at 10:53
It's not all about you.
May 12, 2017 at 10:26
It's not a very successful science. The scientific basis of medicine in other departments seems to result in cures, ameliorations, a reduction in suff...
May 12, 2017 at 10:22
May 09, 2017 at 21:41
Stick with festering resentment; it's much more fun, and allows you to be a justified arsehole yourself.
May 09, 2017 at 21:26
Nothing wrong with being off-putting, when someone is, well pissing on you, to use your term.
May 09, 2017 at 17:19
Have you tried "I'm so sorry, I know it's all my fault, I'm lucky you haven't left me long ago. I wish I could be more worthy of you."?
May 09, 2017 at 15:03
You can't vote for limited government, it never stands for election. It's only ever a question against whom the strength of government is to be direct...
May 09, 2017 at 13:51
It was about bananas and cucumbers. We vote for strong government because we feel powerless, and stable government because we are desperate for change...
May 09, 2017 at 11:06
Your Rand quote is a piece of propaganda. That it is not even half true is not something that is worth arguing about. Rather, ask why someone would wa...
May 08, 2017 at 14:32
I think this thread is fake pornography.
May 06, 2017 at 18:52
Reason is, what? A step by step one thought after another sort of thing? We cannot reason our way to a cup of tea, one has to get up and put the kettl...
May 06, 2017 at 18:50
One might say, "there is nothing game-like about Russian roulette, someone could get killed," but that would be to misunderstand how the term 'game' i...
May 04, 2017 at 15:30
Truth is one of the rules of some of the games. It's the main rule of "Confession", and an important rule of "Philosophy", "History", and even "Biogra...
May 04, 2017 at 09:08
Castlemaine.
May 03, 2017 at 12:54
Given that nuclear war is madness, and we are not mad, then it is common sense that the least stable personality will dominate. "Don't make me mad, yo...
May 01, 2017 at 20:58
That was my thought, a car ferry - vehicles within vehicles. It just seemed a good example of meaning requiring context, the context 'philosophy' bein...
April 30, 2017 at 22:01
I was just passing Mrs un's computer and the film was paused with the subtitle: "Will driving passengers please go to their vehicles." Any philosopher...
April 30, 2017 at 20:24
I don't know, I'd have to try it, and let you kn... no that wouldn't work, would it? Unless we met in the waiting room for incarnation. Well my best g...
April 30, 2017 at 16:55
I don't have an argument with you. You put your attitude to life into the form of a question, but I don't have that attitude, so the question has no m...
April 30, 2017 at 15:57
Not at all. It's not a serious proposal, really, more of a radical alternative to WW3, that couldn't possibly be worse. It would have been a good idea...
April 30, 2017 at 13:04
Well not really, it's just a convenient way of putting it - rephrase it all in terms of nature if you like. The point is, if crime didn't pay, crimina...
April 29, 2017 at 15:39
1. Is the happiness worth the suffering? It does not compute. It does not add or subtract or multiply. 2. Why should we endevor to give anything to so...
April 28, 2017 at 19:55
I reject the calculus of happiness and suffering entirely as a spurious attempt to rationalise the value of life. I love life, you hate it; there is n...
April 28, 2017 at 15:07
In relation to the 'defence' budget? I think not. People are dying every day from dirty water and starvation. Perhaps in N. Korea it is difficult, but...
April 28, 2017 at 14:40
I think there might be some small space between the two, a middle ground. Perhaps preemptive food parcels, or a task force of electricians and plumber...
April 28, 2017 at 12:58
I agree. It cannot be a reason, because it is unreasonable; it is the passion that reason is and ought to be slave to. There are women that like being...
April 28, 2017 at 09:03
Whatever gives you that idea?
April 27, 2017 at 21:20
Mariner on the old forum explained this rather well in religious terms. If goodness was always rewarded and evil always punished, then it would be mer...
April 27, 2017 at 21:09
I side with Kant on this, that to 'have' children for some reason is immoral, because it is treating them as a means. One is left with having children...
April 27, 2017 at 20:09
Read it; it's shit.
April 27, 2017 at 19:53
It is not a law of the universe that good will prevail. On the contrary, the greedy, the violent, the selfish, generally run rings round the kind, the...
April 27, 2017 at 19:48
Indeed. Being is, whereas nothing happens.
April 25, 2017 at 22:16
A knot of thought is quite a good description of the cogito and indeed the self, but If there is certainty that is not ontological, how can it be anyt...
April 25, 2017 at 21:37
Wow! So you do't have any problem with 'I am a tautology'? The performance can be described as I think, 'I think' and 'therefore I am'. But the implic...
April 25, 2017 at 21:04
I keep reading the title as:- "I think, therefore I am a tautology." Which I will now defend as the only correct understanding. That I think is a fact...
April 25, 2017 at 18:09
We so need a thread on 'dare'. Do you ever dare to do things you daren't do? If I dare say something is nonsense, have I said it? The redundancy theor...
April 24, 2017 at 17:30
I have not the least idea.
April 24, 2017 at 11:48
Agreed. But you can share it with me, because we aren't different in that regard. Or perhaps when we discuss the experience further, we will find we a...
April 24, 2017 at 11:47
No it doesn't. One knows the difference by making a comparison. Making a Comparison denies privacy. We compare our private parts and find out that boy...
April 24, 2017 at 10:12
Indeed. Another example of the aphantasia guy who doesn't have the same experience. And we know that we don't have the same experiences to just that e...
April 24, 2017 at 09:35
But earlier, you were rejecting this 'somewhat' in favour of a radical separation between subjective and objective. This latter is what W is arguing a...
April 23, 2017 at 20:01
It's a problem isn't it? One has to say that they are sharing associations, responses (behaviours) but not the quale. Because that is what the quale i...
April 23, 2017 at 14:51
There is a connection. I intend consequences. So one can judge both the intended consequences and the actual consequences on the same moral basis. But...
April 23, 2017 at 11:54
When you call it an aspect, that seems less troubling; but when it is isolated linguistically as 'the quale of red', it has become a veritable beetle ...
April 23, 2017 at 09:05
Mystifying.
April 23, 2017 at 07:54