You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

unenlightened

Comments

This is much more congenial to my own view, though the abstract language I'm not so familiar with. Let me see If I'm getting it right ... My relation ...
August 02, 2017 at 09:37
No, never. I get dispirited, despairing, discouraged, mightily pissed off, sometimes uncaring for self or other, hatred of self and/or other, as well ...
August 01, 2017 at 13:19
I wish I could be more help, you don't sound to be in a good place. All I can say is that if you do nothing, nothing much will happen. Look for any wa...
August 01, 2017 at 09:57
Yes, I think so. It's bad, but not as bad as what it's coping with, kind of like heroin. And suicide is a great cure for depression as it is for heroi...
July 31, 2017 at 22:31
I don't agree - surprise! I might au contraire suggest that the only significant difference between a cliff and a retaining wall is how it got there. ...
July 31, 2017 at 20:53
I don't think accepting or rejecting makes much difference, and certainly not complacency. It's not like a rucksack you can take off. But understandin...
July 31, 2017 at 20:22
Well I'm not going to try and argue you back there. Congratulations, then. :)
July 31, 2017 at 16:18
In: Frames  — view comment
When I saw, 'frames', I immediately thought of the things that attach to my nose and ears that hold the rose-tinted lenses in place.
July 31, 2017 at 16:12
Amen to that.
July 31, 2017 at 16:08
Well the belief is that blacks should be equal to whites, because the difference is no more than skin deep. But the fact is that it is better to be wh...
July 31, 2017 at 14:20
Really? I'm not seeing any reference to sedimentary rocks or anything else produced by other than lifeforms.Where do you get your definition?
July 31, 2017 at 14:04
Oh, to maximise agreement, principle of charity, because meaning is use. What a fucking idiotic question.
July 31, 2017 at 13:26
To which a perfectly intelligible reply would be, "The university relocated to Inverness during the war, and never came back", or even, "the universit...
July 31, 2017 at 13:11
Well I don't have any problem with that, because a sentence's feelings are not hurt by being called false. And in the same way, I don't have any probl...
July 31, 2017 at 12:08
And therefore Ryle's exemplar of a category error turns out not to be one, by his own criteria, and the distinction between the inanimate construction...
July 31, 2017 at 10:35
I think that simply is how it is generally used, and yes, we ought to use it that way too. It is you that wants to suggest that it ought to mean sedim...
July 31, 2017 at 10:22
You said I was biocentric. As if there were another place to be; another viewpoint to take. I must surely be on the right lines here, as I just had th...
July 31, 2017 at 09:56
Yes, I think it is reasonable to deny non-life a centre, where a centre is a point of view. The distinction between life and non-life I would say is i...
July 31, 2017 at 09:17
If peace of mind were an achievement, it would have to be the achievement of an unpeaceful, striving mind. But it is not an achievement at all, but si...
July 31, 2017 at 08:54
Are you not simply employing your superior grading and reward system of 'moral and immoral'?
July 31, 2017 at 08:29
Some interesting comments there. I'm going to have a go at reformulating in a way that avoids some of the objections about human exceptionalism, and a...
July 31, 2017 at 07:17
I stand corrected. :D
July 29, 2017 at 22:04
Well yes and no. I think I have reached a bit more clarity for my own part on the nature of the distinction between social constructs and - well I sti...
July 29, 2017 at 21:49
Absolutely! They like to call it 'confidence'. Paper money at least is nothing more or less than a promissory note.
July 29, 2017 at 21:18
Yes, that's a useful clarification. So the Declaration of Human rights is a fiction, or a pious hope, until it is practiced, and only to the extent th...
July 29, 2017 at 20:03
Yes, I've no argument with that, really. I'm fumbling for the right language a bit. But then there's this: I find this a bit too broad. What would it ...
July 29, 2017 at 18:21
Never mind, then.
July 29, 2017 at 16:02
No, it's your turn to clarify a bit.
July 29, 2017 at 15:54
Thanks a lot, dude. :(
July 29, 2017 at 15:50
I don't know, maybe I'm too stupid. But the only way I can reconcile them is to conclude that everything is a fabrication and we are forever lost in t...
July 29, 2017 at 15:34
I'm having difficulty putting these together in a way that makes sense.
July 29, 2017 at 15:15
Are they? Human nature is claimed as a construct, but it is one founded on something real that is elaborated. Human rights might have the same foundat...
July 29, 2017 at 14:11
I thought it might be interesting to see how things play out in a particular case, and I have chosen one where it might be possible to see social cons...
July 29, 2017 at 12:57
Yes, it is not simple, and 'found' is simply a placeholder for 'not-constructed', that you are very welcome to replace if there is a better term. Ther...
July 29, 2017 at 08:20
That's why I put property as the example of a social construct. It's universal and unquestionable, and gets treated as 'natural'. Yes, I agree it must...
July 29, 2017 at 07:49
When I say things like: The kettle is boiling. The cup is in the cupboard, There is no third person point of view. I am using the third person form. I...
July 26, 2017 at 08:31
Where is that popular argument made? I have referenced some arguments that have been made that relate somewhat to what you propose. But it is time to ...
July 25, 2017 at 20:58
Is it reasonable to suppose that something not being looked at looks like something?
July 25, 2017 at 12:01
So it ain't a point of view, but an abstraction. I'm not arguing for idealism here, merely against the reification of grammar, I agree shit can be tru...
July 25, 2017 at 10:08
Not my POV, and not yours. If the cup is in the cupboard, then it is true that the cup is in the cupboard, but only God sees it. Is God the third pers...
July 25, 2017 at 08:34
There is no problem as long as you stick firmly to the old-fashioned medical notion of a complaint, rather than disease. Very often, it is a parent or...
July 25, 2017 at 05:44
I'm fine with the grammar, but what is a third person point of view?
July 24, 2017 at 21:30
Sure, it's not a necessary connection, but a contingent, historical one. Existentialism has its right wing as well as its left. I suspect Sartre would...
July 24, 2017 at 20:32
Laing was an avowed Existentialist, and i think there was a connection with Sartre, who was also somewhat critical of the traditional family. I think ...
July 24, 2017 at 20:24
One could start with Civilisation and its Discontents, but the beginning of an overt moral attack, not on monogamy as such, but on the institution of ...
July 24, 2017 at 19:30
I haven't figured it out either, but if it's problematic, it's logic that has a problem, not existence. If existence declares that particles are waves...
July 24, 2017 at 14:21
If I was that someone, I'd believe you, because my facial recognition is not great, but if it was a policeman investigating you as a suspect, they mig...
July 24, 2017 at 12:51
I read your post. Did you post though? If you put logic before the world, then you are in trouble. Amend your logic to follow the world. Perhaps someo...
July 24, 2017 at 09:48
Did you answer my question, but I'm too stupid to understand it? Or was the question not clear enough? Can 'existence is not a predicate' be formalise...
July 23, 2017 at 17:49
How would you formalise the title? There does not exist a predicate (x) in language (S) which has the meaning, 'exists' (?). I don't know, but there i...
July 23, 2017 at 15:01