You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Fooloso4

Comments

It is often difficult to determine whether it is worth it. Although where someone has entrenched beliefs and views they are not likely to change them,...
October 18, 2023 at 13:59
Oliver Sacks' The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat might be of interest. If this person tried to eat a hat and we asked him why, we would know a mis...
October 18, 2023 at 13:45
I have read Hadot and found it instructive. If I remember correctly, he had an early interest in mysticism but later moved away from Plotinus’ Neoplat...
October 18, 2023 at 13:27
Experience of what? Does reasoning discover the truth of first things? Why doesn't he teach it to us? He does say that the sign of knowledge or ignora...
October 18, 2023 at 13:02
So when of comes to deep causes you disagree with the first premise?
October 17, 2023 at 23:32
What follows from this tautology? We covered that pages ago. I don't know. I would say that that this raises a problem. Wouldn't we say that if someon...
October 17, 2023 at 23:23
I agree but I think we disagree as to how high we can ascend. I think we also agree that is not something we should argue about since neither of us kn...
October 17, 2023 at 23:00
No, not at all. I simply do not make what has become a common assumption, that Aristotle rejects Plato. We should give some thought to the significanc...
October 17, 2023 at 22:48
Is the problem simply that we cannot say it or that we do not know? If as you say there is: then it is not simply the latter but the former. If, along...
October 17, 2023 at 22:15
If you do not understand that Aristotle's art of writing requires an art of reading Aristotle, then we will not get very far. In large part that requi...
October 17, 2023 at 22:04
I think it is rather the case that this goes against your own opinion and what might be regarded as the standard interpretation. The problem of what c...
October 17, 2023 at 20:00
"Faith based" is misdirection. Aristotle certainly did use theological premises. But as I interpret him these are not premises he holds to be true. Fr...
October 17, 2023 at 14:37
If I mistake X for Y my mental image of X is a picture of Y. Yes, but even though it changes, my mental picture of Zeus is still my mental picture of ...
October 17, 2023 at 14:19
There is a difference between God as a denied premise that claims to be a conclusion and a rejection of that premise. For Aristotle not all causes fal...
October 17, 2023 at 13:39
It is not that it does not warrant response but that you choose not to respond. You begin where you hope to convince others to end, that is, with your...
October 16, 2023 at 19:02
According to the time stamp, I read this 4 minutes after you posted it. It should not come as a surprise that he has not already done so.
October 16, 2023 at 16:43
Mincing words. God is a premise that underlies your claim, which is not an argument, that: You can develop an argument which leads to the conclusion t...
October 16, 2023 at 16:39
The sketch or description is not the mental picture. It is a representation of it. The mental picture may or may not stay relatively stable, but there...
October 16, 2023 at 13:01
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-82309-x https://phys.org/news/2021-02-dogs-body-awareness-consequences-actions.html You said: We do. The qu...
October 16, 2023 at 00:25
Again, this means one thing if the laws of nature are prescriptive and another if they are descriptive. A clear definition of self-organization: If th...
October 15, 2023 at 23:07
Non sequitur. Nature does not "apply" its laws. It seems as though you want to hang on Cartesian categories in order to refute them. Material does not...
October 15, 2023 at 17:19
@"Luke":
October 15, 2023 at 13:31
That is your supposition not a fact. It ignores the work being done on self-organization. It is understandable that you want to put it aside. Human be...
October 14, 2023 at 23:30
The development of self-organizing matter gives rise to the development of organisms. No dualism. This is still misleading. What you said was: That ou...
October 14, 2023 at 20:15
Contemporary philosophers of science, or at least the ones I think are worth reading, are much more likely to talk about self-organizing matter and sy...
October 13, 2023 at 21:54
I have said this more than once. The interlocutor uses it as a physical picture. Because he contrasts the mental picture to the picture. We still have...
October 12, 2023 at 23:53
Having recently read Aristotle's Rhetoric I have been persuaded of the importance of rhetoric in service of the truth. You said you did not want to pu...
October 12, 2023 at 17:26
The picture or description is what is imagined. The former, but to answer the question I could draw a picture or describe that content. Suppose I draw...
October 12, 2023 at 14:19
Some interpret it to mean that we can transcend the cave, but others that we remain in it. Some despise Plato because no matter how deep they go they ...
October 11, 2023 at 17:06
A vase remains the same.
October 11, 2023 at 16:48
No. It is the condition under which the story unfolds. No, we are left with an acknowledgement of the irreconcilability of viewpoints. The question th...
October 11, 2023 at 16:31
If, as you say: how can that image be the same a physical picture which remains relatively unchanged?
October 11, 2023 at 16:08
As I understand it, there is a gap between competing rational arguments, neither of which can resolve the issue, and what motivates an individual to c...
October 11, 2023 at 15:49
I am reminded of the following: I agree that in general if wish to be understood we we should strive for transparency, but things are not always as cl...
October 11, 2023 at 13:40
I don't see any inconsistency. This shows how a picture hanging on the wall differs from a mental picture. How do you reconcile this with PI 389? They...
October 11, 2023 at 13:37
Be careful what you wish for! In response to your comment: I gave an example where an object that exists the environment need not play a role. The ima...
October 11, 2023 at 12:50
It seemed wrong that what is first and primary should be some proposition or rule. What is first is being and beings not something someone, even someo...
October 11, 2023 at 12:21
Something has always bothered me ever since I first read Metaphysics. The term translated as principle. In his recent translation of Metaphysics, Joe ...
October 10, 2023 at 21:48
Suppose neuroscientists were able to give you access to my mental picture and render a public physical picture so that everyone can see what the conte...
October 10, 2023 at 17:48
Not necessarily. As I imagine something can change. One is physical and can be made public, the other cannot. One remains relatively stable and unchan...
October 10, 2023 at 13:42
Paine. Thanks for quoting this: What says you @"Luke"?
October 09, 2023 at 23:38
An important point! Despite what Wittgenstein says about the ordinary it is often an overlooked aspect of his philosophy. All the focus remains on the...
October 09, 2023 at 23:24
The content of the experience of imagining is what is imagined. The experience itself is a picture or description that occurs in the mind. In order to...
October 09, 2023 at 16:30
There are several things at issue here. The opinions we hold about the wise man (982a) refers, on the one hand, to those who desire to be wise and on ...
October 09, 2023 at 14:16
I wish to inquire what he may be up to. I take it that if he doesn't he has good reason why he doesn't. I don't think that not wanting to artificially...
October 08, 2023 at 21:16
If Aristotle is wise then why artificially stipulate a definition of wisdom? If knowledge differs from opinion then why not start by telling us what t...
October 08, 2023 at 13:41
I should have noted earlier that '10' is from part 2 of PI, or in the 4th edition "Philosophy of Psychology A Fragment". How else could the question b...
October 07, 2023 at 20:12
At PI 10 he says: Right, we cannot appeal to a mental image of red. This is discussed at PI 50 and the use of samples and paradigms. At PI 388 he asks...
October 07, 2023 at 15:20
Does the ordinary user make this claim about aliens and Trump? There is nothing ordinary about that claim.
October 06, 2023 at 16:01
When the interlocutor says at the start of 2: "For ..." the claim is that because a picture may be a picture of something else, the mental image is mo...
October 06, 2023 at 15:59