You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mww

Comments

In: Morality  — view comment
Page 51, towards the bottom, part of his string of posts. Seemed quite apropos.
March 30, 2019 at 19:59
In: Morality  — view comment
Oh. One of those New Age types, huh. Too modern for me. What do you think makes distinguishing necessary from contingent truths important? Like....why...
March 30, 2019 at 17:58
In: Morality  — view comment
On this thread, the original rendering of a rigid designator representing morality, forwarded by creativesoul. I don’t know about rigid designator as ...
March 30, 2019 at 17:47
In: Morality  — view comment
All you gotta do is ask yourself.....how many other worlds have I been to? None....probably....so universality is irrelevant. That leaves necessity. I...
March 30, 2019 at 17:18
In: Morality  — view comment
Because the designator is not universal and necessary with respect to its representation, it isn’t rigid? The world ends if you don’t stop at the stop...
March 30, 2019 at 16:56
In: Morality  — view comment
Yeah, and some stuff of genius can’t be taught.
March 30, 2019 at 15:51
In: Morality  — view comment
I didn’t dumb it down, which means you’re just as smart in understanding it as I am in writing it.
March 30, 2019 at 15:34
In: Morality  — view comment
Nope. Lots of books, lots of RAM.
March 30, 2019 at 15:31
In: Morality  — view comment
There’s a lot of them, that’s for sure. Pick one, run with it.
March 30, 2019 at 15:29
In: Morality  — view comment
Nope, just an interest, from Maxwell to Hawking, mostly. The really old and the really new, not so much.
March 30, 2019 at 15:23
In: Morality  — view comment
If you stopped at the stop sign, the rigidity of the designator is validated. If you didn’t, the designator is no less rigid, but you disregarded it f...
March 30, 2019 at 15:17
In: Morality  — view comment
Hmmm.......with only those two choices, guess which I’d pick. (Grin)
March 30, 2019 at 15:04
In: Morality  — view comment
https://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/kant-the-philosophy-of-law It’s long and drawn out, but the part you’re asking about is at the beginning.
March 30, 2019 at 15:02
In: Morality  — view comment
“...The capacity of experiencing Pleasure or Pain on the occasion of a mental representation, is called ‘Feeling,’ because Pleasure and Pain contain o...
March 30, 2019 at 14:43
In: Morality  — view comment
I’ve lost interest in this. The reductionism necessary to validate my argument is so far down in the weeds it couldn’t possibly pass the wtf test.
March 30, 2019 at 13:46
In: Morality  — view comment
So.....Kant, because your report informs me that his “linguistic framework is utterly incapable of taking proper account of the distinction between th...
March 30, 2019 at 12:29
In: Morality  — view comment
Thanks. Read most of the ten pages. I’m comfortable allowing rigid designator to stand as a distinctive representation of a concept. A stop sign can b...
March 30, 2019 at 11:37
In: Morality  — view comment
Now that I understand your world-view having a Rouseauan flavor, I can see why not. Wouldn’t work at all, would it? I’m willing to meet in the middle,...
March 29, 2019 at 19:44
In: Morality  — view comment
Another good point, and relates to what you said about Hume’s simplistic thinking. Hume was an empiricist, which makes explicit the principle of cause...
March 29, 2019 at 16:29
In: Morality  — view comment
OK, so I should have said any discipline having to do with humans in this world demands something like it.
March 29, 2019 at 15:30
In: Morality  — view comment
Agreed. Good thing about Hume...he wrote in good ol’ English, no translational ambiguities. What he wrote is what you get, and of no great difficulty ...
March 29, 2019 at 15:22
In: Morality  — view comment
That’s fine. I think it worth bearing in mind, nevertheless, that any discipline predicated on non-contradiction demands something like it.
March 29, 2019 at 14:37
In: Morality  — view comment
Interesting. How would you put it, and how does it make morality relative?
March 29, 2019 at 14:14
In: Morality  — view comment
I see what you mean, wherein the realms of anthropology and morality tend to overlap, something like Janus’ civil intentionality. Virtue ethics. That’...
March 29, 2019 at 14:09
In: Morality  — view comment
True enough. Rather Utopian, though, isn’t it? Idealistic? You’re asking for something history has never given, except in small pockets the rest of hu...
March 29, 2019 at 13:53
In: Morality  — view comment
Is this what you were referring me to? Let's say hypothetically that the whole world is sat round a table deciding what 'The Law' should be........ (H...
March 29, 2019 at 13:45
In: Morality  — view comment
If that is true, then it follows necessarily that lacking any evidence whatsoever, what was not so easy becomes impossible.
March 29, 2019 at 13:27
In: Morality  — view comment
....... Last things first. Kant is how all the above even happened. You couldn’t have thought any of that without the machinations in your head. The i...
March 29, 2019 at 13:02
In: Morality  — view comment
It’s a never ending reduction, seems like, doesn’t it? One does his duty when he doesn’t really want to, which is much more morally meritorious becaus...
March 28, 2019 at 22:02
In: Morality  — view comment
I have no truck with moral objectivism; it’s actually an impossible view, simply because humans are fundamentally all the same, but our entire evoluti...
March 28, 2019 at 21:28
In: Morality  — view comment
Yes. On here someplace was presented a scenario of a fully racist culture, with a single member’s instance of avowed non-racism, but without any visua...
March 28, 2019 at 19:10
In: Morality  — view comment
I see it that way, yes. Morality is a fundamental condition of being human. It’s not a thing; it’s the name given to one of the things that makes us h...
March 28, 2019 at 18:25
In: Morality  — view comment
I think that because Kant stipulates that morality is a fundamental human condition, and such morality in human form at least, is claimed to be predic...
March 28, 2019 at 15:02
In: Morality  — view comment
If that is the case, then n as a prerequisite for m contradicts m being an effectively foundational stance. N can’t be both before and after m if m is...
March 28, 2019 at 14:11
In: Morality  — view comment
One ideology in conflict with another doesn’t negate the rationality of the given maxim. It may be irrational to even have a conflict, but that is not...
March 28, 2019 at 13:33
In: Morality  — view comment
I doubt I ever presented my thought “one should not kill” is not rational. Don’t know why I would, especially when it seems perfectly rational to me.
March 28, 2019 at 12:32
In: Morality  — view comment
Yikes!! That’s a tough one, right there. Lemme see if I understand this the way you intended: ......too entrenched.....that’s me, in the writing of th...
March 28, 2019 at 12:10
In: Morality  — view comment
LOL. Oh hell no, I don’t want to be famous. I use authority to make some points, but I grant that what I say of my own accord has no kind of authority...
March 28, 2019 at 11:00
Space and time?
March 28, 2019 at 00:41
In: Morality  — view comment
Where do you see intention in Kantian moral philosophy? Or any brand, for that matter. I never gave it much thought, myself.
March 28, 2019 at 00:18
In: Morality  — view comment
Yeah, The Good Professor took some serious flak for his conditions for maxims on lying. There are several references for the topic, and in typical Kan...
March 27, 2019 at 23:47
In: Morality  — view comment
I’m aware, and I’ve already covered murder. Call it whatever you like, directly or indirectly, but you can bet your ass Tim wasn’t talking about me wh...
March 27, 2019 at 23:08
In: Morality  — view comment
Yeah, I could have, but I was more interested in what she said.
March 27, 2019 at 20:56
In: Morality  — view comment
Anscombe MMP, 1958) The categorical imperative is a misrepresentation. Anscombe actually said “...his rule on universalized maxims is useless without ...
March 27, 2019 at 19:15
In: Morality  — view comment
Cool. Wasn’t aware of that. Thanks.
March 27, 2019 at 15:43
In: Morality  — view comment
Wall of Sound.....as in Phil Specter? And his all-girl groups of the 60’s?
March 27, 2019 at 15:32
In: Morality  — view comment
The question is not absurd *because* it removes the answer from psychology, which is the empirical doctrine of inclinations, and installs it into meta...
March 27, 2019 at 15:05
In: Morality  — view comment
Ironic, isn’t it, that conceptions or ideas or even mere notions, intended to be so all-inclusive the induction principle cannot falsify them, can onl...
March 27, 2019 at 13:34
In: Morality  — view comment
Yes, but there is still the question about a possible instantiation for it. If a society is of a certain moral persuasion, and a fully inculcated memb...
March 27, 2019 at 12:38
In: Morality  — view comment
I gotta say, being an unabashed transcendentalist, if ANYBODY had said he’d said anything about Kant in general and the CI in particular, I would have...
March 26, 2019 at 21:31