You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mww

Comments

Ok, fine. The Rock....with or without hair? ———————
November 24, 2020 at 20:34
The c.i. Is not an application to the world; it is a command of reason, that conditions the subjective moral determinations applied because of the wor...
November 24, 2020 at 15:40
Categorical error: seeing a mechanical representation, an altogether empirical enterprise, is very far removed from the a priori originating cause it....
November 24, 2020 at 14:07
I don’t use mind with respect to thinking, mind being merely a logical placeholder having no pure functionality of its own except to arbitrarily termi...
November 23, 2020 at 21:36
And yours, too, re: the argument that the hard problem is defined into being so. Leave it to reason to confuse itself.
November 23, 2020 at 16:58
Yes, we can identify consciousness in the human object by studying how the human behaves. All that is required is acceptance that a human also “behave...
November 23, 2020 at 15:32
The bulbous center of the wheel cover on a ‘52 Chrysler is bigger than the entire hand of a 3yo. Souvenir fabrication, my ass.
November 19, 2020 at 20:41
Which is fine; that which is not primarily empirical has no business being addressed under empirical conditions anyway. Logical speculation remains, a...
November 18, 2020 at 23:10
Yes, but Kantian epistemology is not so concerned. Some renditions of idealism may endorse direct perception because ideas are right there in the mind...
November 18, 2020 at 14:06
Yes, it would, insofar as we have no warrant to stipulate that the human intuitive, representational system is the only possible means to experience. ...
November 17, 2020 at 15:05
Agreed. Quality of redness is not a property; it is the condition of the property of red. We experience the property, we merely think the relative con...
November 17, 2020 at 13:28
Try critical self-analysis, rather than metacognition.
November 16, 2020 at 17:34
I don’t understand this noticing a weasel.
November 16, 2020 at 17:16
While I subscribe to that condition as well, it may be worth remarking that the schematic doesn’t qualify the real object perceived as having any colo...
November 16, 2020 at 13:13
Perhaps in some respects, but the “REMARK ON THE AMPHIBOLY OF THE CONCEPTIONS OF REFLECTION“ , A261/B316, is a 20-page destruction of Liebnitz’s monad...
November 15, 2020 at 20:55
He probably did, perhaps because, in the interest of a complete metaphysical system, and after positing that the understanding is the faculty of thoug...
November 15, 2020 at 14:22
If that is the case, why would an entire chapter be dedicated to distinguishing one from the other? “...That sort of intuition which relates to an obj...
November 15, 2020 at 01:48
No doubt. And that has only to do with his moral philosophy. His speculative epistemology has been professionally superseded....or neglected outright....
November 08, 2020 at 21:16
Ehhhhh.....you know how it is, right? Somebody’s gotta show the post-moderns how they went off the epistemic rails. Kidding. Reading a lot does not ne...
November 08, 2020 at 19:25
“.....Don't our internal discriminative states also have some special "intrinsic" properties, the subjective, private, ineffable, properties that cons...
November 08, 2020 at 15:25
So if I reject the notion of qualia, but insist my senses are generally trustworthy, I’m just deluding myself? Or maybe it’s the other way around........
November 07, 2020 at 20:46
So those who don’t perceive them are the ones who don’t trust their senses?
November 07, 2020 at 13:07
A worthy endeavor. Opening major will be important. Carry on!!
November 06, 2020 at 18:54
Yeah......”raw feels”....”seemings”.....are themselves modes of thought, in as much as a subject can neither ask himself nor tell himself about the “s...
November 06, 2020 at 14:52
Experience is a synthesis, not an aggregate. Experiences cannot be disassembled, they may only be analyzed. Beware misplaced concreteness.
November 05, 2020 at 21:11
Wasn’t trying to. You asked, I answered. Using my understanding. Ok, fine. You’re entitled to that. Still, the infinity of space or time makes perfect...
November 05, 2020 at 11:23
First a duck, then a rabbit are each seemings in themselves, yes. Easily understood. Shaded bars are not illusory seemings, insofar as I do actually i...
November 04, 2020 at 22:51
Ok, but some illusions are actual seemings, re: the bulging part of the checkerboard, and some illusions do not seem so but must be illustrated as suc...
November 04, 2020 at 21:53
So.....qualia advocate, then? What part are they playing in these illusion scenarios, do you say?
November 04, 2020 at 21:23
Interesting. Still, that human sensibility is susceptible to hoodwinking, is hardly contestable. Seen one constructed illusion, seen ‘em all, right?
November 04, 2020 at 19:12
Just sayin’ I don’t hold the same incredulity, that’s all.
November 04, 2020 at 16:29
Ok.
November 04, 2020 at 15:50
I suppose....keyword, notion. An actual infinity would have to be thought as a concept in and of itself, merely to represent that of which the totalit...
November 04, 2020 at 14:49
Is it, really? Where, exactly, is the illusion? Do you see A.)....you are being TOLD there is an illusion, and B.)....you are being COERCED, by means ...
November 04, 2020 at 13:20
I’d say mathematicians might hold with actual completed sets of infinite members, but philosophers tend to hold with the potential of infinitely conti...
November 04, 2020 at 12:21
Agreed, on consciousness, and understood on Dennett. Thanks.
November 03, 2020 at 17:09
It is impossible to know, which makes it irrational to ask how I know.
November 03, 2020 at 17:05
Yes, adequate, with respect to empirical knowledge. Would you agree with me, that human reason is often not satisfied with the merely adequate?
November 03, 2020 at 15:57
What say I? Nothing more than....... ........to keep adding implies infinity hasn't been “gotten”, and infinity “gotten” implies there is no adding, “...
November 03, 2020 at 15:33
Given the conditions under which the conception of infinity is thought by us, the question is irrational with respect to our universe.
November 03, 2020 at 13:04
The problem didn’t need inventing; it occurs immediately from the invention of consciousness itself. Not much doubt the problem has been made difficul...
October 30, 2020 at 15:44
I’ve appreciated methodological parallelism since James, 1890b, v1, and this book since I downloaded it 8 years ago. Good read, interesting informatio...
October 28, 2020 at 23:31
Proof that the grass is shorter now then it was before implies no necessity for the term “lawnmower”. Your ........is out of context.
October 27, 2020 at 14:35
Addendum. I seem to be running amok with them today. How about we ask it to enclose a space? If it cannot, it is a zombie.
October 27, 2020 at 13:40
Gotta be careful here, though. The theoretical construction of p-zombies makes explicit they must be indistinguishable from humans, but it is just as ...
October 27, 2020 at 13:13
I think it sloppy for anyone to use intuition as a psychological term; intuition remains philosophical, as far as my use of it will ever extend. But y...
October 27, 2020 at 12:42
Ridiculous, aye!! Concur, and I would add, it is preposterous to conceive of a thing missing the very attribute (e.g., conscious experience, Kirk, 200...
October 27, 2020 at 00:01
While I agree with that, under a certain set of conditions for the metaphysical conceivability of zombies in the first place, it is at the same time c...
October 26, 2020 at 23:12
True enough, with the proviso that a human object of the query wasn’t ignoring me, or just didn’t hear me. ———— On 1637!!!.....just goes to show: all ...
October 26, 2020 at 22:59