You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mww

Comments

When Hume suggested a human with otherwise correct vision can install a missing shade of blue, he has already granted that the name of the color doesn...
March 31, 2023 at 13:31
If I may, in conjunction with your quote as it concerns the empirical side, I submit that the only need to make sense of appearances being deceptive, ...
March 31, 2023 at 11:44
Which world is that? Existent worlds depend on human understanding, possibly existent worlds depend on human understanding. Even those cursed damnable...
March 29, 2023 at 12:16
These say very different things. One is more the case than the other.
March 29, 2023 at 09:48
Cool. Guess the sidebar wasn’t that irrelevant after all.
March 28, 2023 at 13:48
Guess you get to blame me if I got it all wrong, then, huh? That’s fine; I’d be blaming me too.
March 27, 2023 at 21:58
Hence my favored position, calling a false dichotomy, insofar as it concerns realism. Direct mediated access (to real things, as sensation), yet indir...
March 27, 2023 at 20:38
HA!!! I’ll see your massive, and raise you a complete!! Pretty silly of ol’ Mother to endow us with a most seriously complex intellectual machinery, t...
March 27, 2023 at 18:44
I like mediated/unmediated over direct/indirect, but should they relate to perception? You’d know better than I, but it seems to me like the same fals...
March 27, 2023 at 16:26
Look again. Still much better?
March 27, 2023 at 12:14
There is a way. Observation for empirical constructs, the assessment from which is experience; logic for rational constructs, the assessment from whic...
March 27, 2023 at 11:35
I like it!!!! Shades of Plato’s Republic: at the point/moment of perception, we know THAT it is, but we don’t know WHAT it is. ———- After the edit, I ...
March 27, 2023 at 10:27
Cool. I was just thinking…..Enlightenment moral philosophy proposed freedom as a causal “what not”, the necessary condition for production of objectiv...
March 27, 2023 at 09:19
Most likely not. But, as I said, from analysis of the concepts themselves, the notion is reducible to mere unmediated objectivity. Right, but the answ...
March 27, 2023 at 00:37
I’m cool with that. I rather think the whole shebang is a false dichotomy anyway, so….
March 26, 2023 at 22:51
So is anything necessary regarding direct naive realism? If we’re already given that which is necessary, with respect to an answer to a question conce...
March 26, 2023 at 22:36
Easy. Accept the intrinsic duality of human intelligence, regardless of the various suppositions for its methods. Direct realism…..merely from analysi...
March 26, 2023 at 22:24
Yikes!! Can’t have that. Point it out for me?
March 26, 2023 at 21:27
Doesn’t make any sense with respect to the central nervous + peripherals system from a physical point of view, nor with respect to some theoretical co...
March 26, 2023 at 20:34
Yeah….something said is the superficial silliness of it all on the one hand, re: the implicit absurdity involved in denying there are real basketballs...
March 26, 2023 at 13:35
I do prefer the other names. Because I can tell you what a real basketball is, but I promise you there’s never been a real basketball in my head.
March 26, 2023 at 00:33
Everyone directly sees the tree. Maybe not, but there are representations necessarily. It is impossible that there are not. Or if not representations,...
March 25, 2023 at 20:44
The guy on the left. Take away the figure in his head, put in the cloud with the figure in it. The cloud indicates the figure is a representation of t...
March 25, 2023 at 19:52
Yes. Otherwise, you’d be forced to admit the two guy’s eyes don’t work the same way, and by association, it is indeterminable who’s eyes will see the ...
March 25, 2023 at 19:43
Why does the indirect guy have that cloudy thing in front of his face?
March 25, 2023 at 19:28
Is there a name you might use, by which this faculty is also known? To say one exists with a nature that fundamentally includes such an objective obli...
March 25, 2023 at 12:41
“…And a rock feels no pain. And an island never cries…”
March 24, 2023 at 13:06
https://www.academia.edu/3843328/Watkins0002 Scroll down, past all the other stuff. No registration, no pay.
March 23, 2023 at 10:04
Categorical error. Existence for humans is immanent, not transcendent. There may be possible transcendent existences, but impossible that they be empi...
March 22, 2023 at 19:13
A423/B451 Thing is, we are only impartial umpires for someone else’s judgements as expressed in his language. For each of us, for whatever our own rea...
March 20, 2023 at 11:12
“…. As impartial umpires, we must lay aside entirely the consideration whether the combatants are fighting for the right or for the wrong side, for th...
March 19, 2023 at 11:39
HA!! I was thinking more Lucy to everybody else’s, except a scant few, Charlie Brown. Destroys the game by yanking the football, then thinks it a win....
March 18, 2023 at 22:35
C’mon, man. Don’t do me like that. The “which case?” is your discussion with , re: , then repeated in kind with , re: You chastised me for not having ...
March 18, 2023 at 11:58
See…this is where guys like me get lost in the modern shuffle. I pointed out the error in the one case, where the initial condition was an idea but yo...
March 18, 2023 at 10:59
Ehhhh….I trusted you not to have any trouble putting the proper words in place of the dots. No one asked for it.
March 18, 2023 at 00:21
And thinking is the tool of the human being…….
March 17, 2023 at 22:50
No problem, examples notwithstanding. That understanding is required nonetheless, in order for the argument following from it to hold. Basically all i...
March 17, 2023 at 10:20
An idea is a “problematic conception”, a singular representation of the understanding, for which the intuition of an object belonging to it is impossi...
March 16, 2023 at 10:58
Yep.
March 13, 2023 at 22:10
Depending on whose terminology is used, such speculations are transcendental, insofar as ALL speculations, whether physical/empirical or transcendenta...
March 13, 2023 at 21:42
No. Reason doesn’t concern itself with the reality of appearances, nor imagining ideals. Reason is a logical function, by which the principles we unde...
March 13, 2023 at 20:09
From the prelude to the exposition of the antinomies…. “…. It may be said that the object of a merely transcendental idea is something of which we hav...
March 13, 2023 at 11:01
Ok. Thanks.
March 11, 2023 at 13:26
You’re overthinking it, perhaps. The context is…..what exemplifies philosophical thought, pursuant to the OP, or elaborations on it. This asks for som...
March 10, 2023 at 23:16
The context is what exemplifies philosophical thought. Real human individuals, in the form of “finite human beings” never are alone sufficient for tha...
March 10, 2023 at 15:12
Knitted my eyebrows right there myself.
March 10, 2023 at 12:00
Yeah, it’s pretty much established, via the historical record in general and this article by Chalmers in particular, that philosophy’s main claim-to-f...
March 09, 2023 at 13:45
Yeah, my mistake. The quote says not plausible, which isn’t the same as implausible.
March 08, 2023 at 17:13
So this must be the joke everybody’s talking about….all positions are implausible but any of them might be true. And if one of them turns out to be tr...
March 08, 2023 at 17:05
Which just says substance monism is no better or worse than any other -ism. So what’s the point of it? How is it not adding another implausibility on ...
March 08, 2023 at 16:50