You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mww

Comments

Reason certainly can be used to ascertain something further about these things, these things being noumena. But upon discovery of this something new, ...
February 05, 2019 at 14:54
May I offer a nice Tuscan Chianti and perhaps a Hoyo de Monterrey to accompany, so to celebrate the good man’s martyrdom? My treat, of course.
February 04, 2019 at 21:02
Ahhh....excellent. You are quite correct. The whole reach of this kind of metaphysics has to do with the relational nature of human reason, to which e...
February 04, 2019 at 18:13
Perhaps by the terms of the dilemma, but the dilemma itself is merely an occassion for the exploration of the predicates of moral behavior. With respe...
February 04, 2019 at 16:56
“.... What you’re missing....if anything, really....is, it depends on how one uses the term. Science, including the Enlightenment era science of Kant’...
February 04, 2019 at 16:42
Under the assumption that preservation of life is the primary marker for moral agency: Being intelligent enough to be a law enforcement officer, and t...
February 04, 2019 at 13:42
I grant some conceptions may exist hardwired in the mind, as a product of the kind of rational being we are, re: necessity, correlation, existence. Th...
February 03, 2019 at 21:34
Then how do we know them? How can they be thought?
February 03, 2019 at 18:02
Ideas on the subject. Or, more accurately, opinions. Or, more more accurately, a possibly inaccurate understanding of an EXCRUCIATINGLY complex specul...
February 03, 2019 at 15:30
OK. Agreed. I’m in no position to hold with the things I learned here today, even while appreciating the exposure to them. I think I’m going to stick ...
February 02, 2019 at 20:03
Holy crap on a cracker.....I never even knew there was any of that stuff. Now I see where you’re coming from. I looked up some of the things you broug...
February 02, 2019 at 18:48
Wha....wait. A finite set is has size zero? So an unpopulated empty set is the same size as a set of countable numbers? In other words, the set is wha...
February 02, 2019 at 18:10
Don’t we have to construct our mathematical and logical forms a priori? Then go about proving their truths in the world?
February 02, 2019 at 17:58
Ahhh....that’s what you meant before by involving sets or elements of sets. OK, fine. I can dig chopping off sets of zero size; that’s just an empty s...
February 02, 2019 at 17:31
The OP stipulates a infinitely divisible quantity. Number lines do not exist in Nature, but one can be imagined a priori, consisting of an arbitrary, ...
February 02, 2019 at 16:04
I’m trying to picture a guy, standing there chopping off sections of a number line of x units, each part having zero size. I understand doing so is th...
February 02, 2019 at 15:14
So the conclusion is, there is no NOW? NOW is impossible because getting to it is impossible? So the real reason people’s sense of reality is threaten...
February 02, 2019 at 14:49
So your opinion is, because a quantity divided infinitely would have parts with zero size, no quantity can be infinitely divided? Not being a math guy...
February 02, 2019 at 13:20
I can live with that. If I were to modify it to fit me better, I’d say, may have imperfect knowledge of it. This because we only have one means of acc...
February 01, 2019 at 20:49
Interesting read. Thanks for giving me something to think about. I wonder...is it possible to be one at the exclusion of the other? If not, how far do...
February 01, 2019 at 15:16
Different perspectives are always good, so.....thanks. “...preoccupation with questions about methods tends to distract us from prosecuting the method...
February 01, 2019 at 12:32
(Charlie Chaplin shuffle, stage left)
February 01, 2019 at 00:25
Yeah, well, some thought experiments were intentionally constructed to exemplify a theoretically impossible situation. And, if I’m putting my knowledg...
January 31, 2019 at 22:06
If I’m dead, and THEN the lockers are presented to me......all my knowledge is junk. The implication is I understand what a locker is, what it’s for a...
January 31, 2019 at 18:15
If I see a syllogism manufactured with a false major premise, I have a tendency to disregard the conclusion. Sorry.....just the way Mama tol’ me. On t...
January 31, 2019 at 16:24
I didn’t say, and certainly had no intention of implying, we all respect the law. What makes you think the government dictates, or wants to dictate, t...
January 30, 2019 at 22:52
If respect is to ground something as important as morality, it should be given a meaning undiluted by variables. Respect for this, respect for that, r...
January 30, 2019 at 15:11
From where I sit, three of four of the fundamental tenets of Objectivist philosophy don’t correlate to basic human nature. Simple as that.
January 30, 2019 at 13:42
I grant your general thesis with respect to propositional truths, but the OP designates “logical fictions”, one of which is “a truth is propositional ...
January 30, 2019 at 12:51
Oh, I didn’t mean to imply anything of the sort directly at anybody, just generally editorializing. That being said, and if I was forced to think abou...
January 30, 2019 at 00:07
I’ll take your word for it. Obviously, they treat transcendental differently.
January 29, 2019 at 22:22
Correct, in principle, according to the rules of logic. Correct, within the same reference frame. While in the Universe, it can be said there was noth...
January 29, 2019 at 21:38
Ok, I’ll give it a shot. If I fall out of a tree, it is not true I will hit the ground, if I don’t tell anybody I just fell out of a tree? If I fall o...
January 29, 2019 at 14:16
These, along with belief, are just judgements with degrees of certainty. An opinion has no sufficient certainty at all, as in “I think this party will...
January 29, 2019 at 13:51
The use of “consciousness” here is a misnomer; it should be “reason”. For Kant, transcendent means beyond the possibility of any and all experience, b...
January 28, 2019 at 13:16
Now this makes sense to me. These “machinic assemblages”, as “important parts of subjectivity” already have names, their job descriptions are already ...
January 27, 2019 at 23:36
So is that what this is...Josh’s “dynamical systems models to convey the reflexive self-transformative quality of experience”? OK, sure. There’s no “i...
January 27, 2019 at 23:17
Being conscious while multitasking, yes. These are the multiplicity of occasions for, and the multiplicity of forms of, empirical data given to percep...
January 27, 2019 at 20:19
I don’t think the average human being does that. It is only when I stop to theorize about what’s going on between my ears do I have to distinguish bet...
January 27, 2019 at 17:03
A philosophy cannot be proven wrong; its empirical tenets can only be shown to be in conflict with practical experience, and its logical tenets shown ...
January 27, 2019 at 15:32
In the interest of graduating from the outdated....OK, in principle. Yep....”nature of” just so conceived, “states of” just so identified, got the mol...
January 27, 2019 at 13:31
LOL. I don’t have to worry about keeping my job. Or keeping my publisher off my back. Plus the best part....everybody can say I’m hopelessly outdated,...
January 26, 2019 at 23:15
Yeah, probably. Simple case of I don’t know any better.
January 26, 2019 at 22:38
As do I. “I” is the pure representation of the unity of consciousness, such that it becomes possible to think all contents of consciousness, whatever ...
January 26, 2019 at 22:24
Agreed. The traditional apprehension with respect to the conception of consciousness is that it is a singular faculty, or functionality, or rational e...
January 26, 2019 at 17:35
Not being all that familiar with James, does he say what he thinks consciousness to be? Without that, how can it said whether or not it is discontinuo...
January 26, 2019 at 15:48
The salesman is nothing but a particular member in the general set of traders. Galt, and therefore Rand, defines trader as this moral symbol of respec...
January 25, 2019 at 16:51
And you are so bold as to say I haven’t read and don’t understand Rand, when you don't know I haven’t and I don’t? Because we disagree means I’m wrong...
January 24, 2019 at 22:36
If this, , is what Rand was trying to say, how can I be blamed for missing it when neither it nor anything resembling it, was included or hinted in th...
January 24, 2019 at 21:22
“....The symbol of all relationships among such men, the moral symbol of respect for human beings, is the trader. We, who live by values, not by loot,...
January 24, 2019 at 19:57