You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Isaac

Comments

Indeed. Although a (thankfully) small number of researchers I've known have expressed a similar opinion of their statisticians, so researcher's judgem...
January 27, 2020 at 19:09
I'm not seeing the disparity you're drawing between those positions. One says that whether something is a fact or an opinion is a matter of the degree...
January 27, 2020 at 19:04
I see, so this is hinging on what we mean by 'just opinion'? I mentioned my interpretation of that phrase in my earlier posts, but my writing is not a...
January 27, 2020 at 18:10
Interesting post but I'm afraid I'm at a loss to understand how it relates to anything I'm saying. I'm talking about the distinction between knowing t...
January 27, 2020 at 16:22
I think this is largely true. I'm not an art historian so I only have my lay knowledge to go on, but I struggle to think of any art older than 50 year...
January 27, 2020 at 10:42
She's not getting involved in the scientific debate. She's involved in the political debate. She's making political demands and those opposed to her a...
January 27, 2020 at 09:09
The 'point' was you saying that people could not coherently hold a position that philosophy was really hard and yet simultaneously dismiss it as 'all ...
January 27, 2020 at 08:24
Firstly, that only benefits services which are purchasable. In making money individuals and companies make use of public resources which need to be re...
January 27, 2020 at 08:12
People can either buy from Amazon or not. It's not in the least bit hard to not buy stuff from Amazon and if everyone stopped doing so, the Bezos empi...
January 27, 2020 at 07:58
Well, depending on our intent, we may have any easy or a hard time of it, but if we faced difficulties they would be mostly the result of the lack of ...
January 26, 2020 at 19:32
No. What is your opinion about the deeper meaning in the poem 'the jabberwocky'? Don't know, I've never read it. What is your opinion about the contri...
January 26, 2020 at 19:28
Yes they can. One is an opinion about the modalities of the rule set and the other is an opinion about the meta data. Two different areas of knowledge...
January 26, 2020 at 18:54
Right... So that constitutes control and power over the structures doesn't it. That they can vote people into positions of control, based on their int...
January 26, 2020 at 18:35
What barriers are in the way then? Voting in an election couldn't be easier really. Standing for election is slightly harder but still no more so than...
January 26, 2020 at 18:25
Indeed. But that doesn't prevent them from having an informed and valid opinion about the origin or scope of those rules, that's the point. I am not w...
January 26, 2020 at 18:13
Your original cclaim was... ... This is clearly not true because if private citizens wanted to make such a purchase, they would simply elect someone (...
January 26, 2020 at 18:08
Yes, that is the exact point I'm disputing. It is possible to create a set of rules, the inclusion of each member of that set being nothing but opinio...
January 26, 2020 at 17:59
The categorical distinction is beside the point. I'm not denying the it is possible to classify people on the basis of their job, but your categories ...
January 26, 2020 at 17:56
Are you suggesting private citizens are barred from being public officials?
January 26, 2020 at 17:45
The legislature and enforcement bodies are constituted of private citizens and in most modern cases the rule makers are elected by private citizens in...
January 26, 2020 at 17:11
I'll be sure to bear that in mind.
January 26, 2020 at 17:01
Well, I'll just have to take your word for it. I've recently been entreated to trust experts in the field, perhaps this would be a good place to start...
January 26, 2020 at 16:59
I'm afraid I have no idea what you're talking about.
January 26, 2020 at 16:48
Not a definition I'm aware of. Perhaps you could enlighten me.
January 26, 2020 at 16:45
'Morality' is a theory? In what form?
January 26, 2020 at 16:42
No. Because a right move in chess is agreed upon by every single chess player in the world. There is no equivalent agreed upon 'right move' in ethics.
January 26, 2020 at 16:39
So, are you suggesting that, for example, epistemology has a pre-existing set of criteria determining what constitutes the field? That it's not define...
January 26, 2020 at 16:37
The amphiboly is the point. Simply declaring a subject matter does not confer a field of expertise, its just a name. Actual competition of theories de...
January 26, 2020 at 14:27
Yes, but if one of these hypothetical chess experts claims that his expertise on bishops extends to, say, real bishops, we aren't obliged to simply ta...
January 26, 2020 at 13:31
You're thinking too simplistically in terms of buying influence with direct payments. This is only a tiny fraction of the mean by which money can buy ...
January 26, 2020 at 11:58
This is not a dissonating position to hold. Advanced chess is too hard and heady for many, but those expert at it do not "know" anything more about "a...
January 26, 2020 at 11:04
What would "questioning" constitute? I think there's plenty of "questioning" going on, open any newspapers, even the right wing rags, and you'll not r...
January 26, 2020 at 10:28
An oft repeated mantra with startlingly little by way of empirical support.
January 24, 2020 at 14:45
People transform the land simply by taking part in the ecosystem. Your logic here would give indigenous tribes the rights to all the land outside of E...
January 24, 2020 at 13:58
I don't doubt there are limits (to doubt that would lead to idealism), but I doubt we could ever describe those limits, we can only refer to them tang...
January 24, 2020 at 13:47
That's really all it is. It seems to have got blown up into a debate about the qualities of academics in social sciences and philosophy and I don't qu...
December 11, 2019 at 07:24
I think that's very well said. What I was trying (but I think ultimately failing) to come up with was a way of separating out a category of discussion...
December 10, 2019 at 07:32
Firstly, I don't see what's elitist about wanting to have a section where matters are taken a bit more seriously. We have already split off 'the loung...
December 10, 2019 at 07:01
Yes, probably. I'm not lamenting the entire existence of banal one-liners, I'm just explaining how some of them in certain contexts seem out of place ...
December 09, 2019 at 15:46
The truth is massively overrated.
December 09, 2019 at 09:58
Yeah, I'd thought about doing one on Ramsey's 'Truth and Probability' (seemed pertinent to some of the discussion we'd recently had), but the problem ...
December 09, 2019 at 09:53
Yeah, you're probably right, you've more experience with this community than I have. Having the good fortune to be (semi-)retired I've a bit more free...
December 08, 2019 at 21:37
Two things. Firstly, I'm not talking about making anything 'only' about academic papers, I was only suggesting a category dedicated to it. Secondly, I...
December 08, 2019 at 18:45
I don't mean to be overly pessimistic here (it's a known character flaw), but doesn't the second sentence rather just indicate that there's simply no ...
December 08, 2019 at 18:36
Not quite what I had in mind, not so much requests for help with papers, or guidance with reading. I was more thinking about grouping those threads wh...
December 08, 2019 at 12:48
I get what you're both saying. I don't know if my comment came across the way I intended it, but I didn't necessarily mean we should ban a load of peo...
December 08, 2019 at 08:23
As I said, I'm only speculating in the absence of any evidence to the contrary. If you're happy with Massimo's given reasons then I stand corrected. I...
December 07, 2019 at 16:56
I'm hesitant to speculate about another's motives, but as I don't suppose the professor will have any interest in divulging his reasons (nor should he...
December 07, 2019 at 13:55
Nicely put.
November 27, 2019 at 14:42
What 'rights of others' does this work need to avoid the infringement of? I ask because if one of those rights is the right to property, then your arg...
November 27, 2019 at 14:16